Cargando…
The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in neuroscience and clinical settings to modulate human cortical activity. The effects of TMS on neural activity depend on the excitability of specific neural populations at the time of stimulation. Accordingly, the brain state at the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954875 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222 |
_version_ | 1785133383883423744 |
---|---|
author | Goldenkoff, Elana R. Deluisi, Joseph A. Destiny, Danielle P. Lee, Taraz G. Michon, Katherine J. Brissenden, James A. Taylor, Stephan F. Polk, Thad A. Vesia, Michael |
author_facet | Goldenkoff, Elana R. Deluisi, Joseph A. Destiny, Danielle P. Lee, Taraz G. Michon, Katherine J. Brissenden, James A. Taylor, Stephan F. Polk, Thad A. Vesia, Michael |
author_sort | Goldenkoff, Elana R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in neuroscience and clinical settings to modulate human cortical activity. The effects of TMS on neural activity depend on the excitability of specific neural populations at the time of stimulation. Accordingly, the brain state at the time of stimulation may influence the persistent effects of repetitive TMS on distal brain activity and associated behaviors. We applied intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to a region in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) associated with grasp control to evaluate the interaction between stimulation and brain state. Across two experiments, we demonstrate the immediate responses of motor cortex activity and motor performance to state-dependent parietal stimulation. We randomly assigned 72 healthy adult participants to one of three TMS intervention groups, followed by electrophysiological measures with TMS and behavioral measures. Participants in the first group received iTBS to PPC while performing a grasping task concurrently. Participants in the second group received iTBS to PPC while in a task-free, resting state. A third group of participants received iTBS to a parietal region outside the cortical grasping network while performing a grasping task concurrently. We compared changes in motor cortical excitability and motor performance in the three stimulation groups within an hour of each intervention. We found that parietal stimulation during a behavioral manipulation that activates the cortical grasping network increased downstream motor cortical excitability and improved motor performance relative to stimulation during rest. We conclude that constraining the brain state with a behavioral task during brain stimulation has the potential to optimize plasticity induction in cortical circuit mechanisms that mediate movement processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10637360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106373602023-11-11 The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest Goldenkoff, Elana R. Deluisi, Joseph A. Destiny, Danielle P. Lee, Taraz G. Michon, Katherine J. Brissenden, James A. Taylor, Stephan F. Polk, Thad A. Vesia, Michael Front Neurosci Neuroscience Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in neuroscience and clinical settings to modulate human cortical activity. The effects of TMS on neural activity depend on the excitability of specific neural populations at the time of stimulation. Accordingly, the brain state at the time of stimulation may influence the persistent effects of repetitive TMS on distal brain activity and associated behaviors. We applied intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to a region in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) associated with grasp control to evaluate the interaction between stimulation and brain state. Across two experiments, we demonstrate the immediate responses of motor cortex activity and motor performance to state-dependent parietal stimulation. We randomly assigned 72 healthy adult participants to one of three TMS intervention groups, followed by electrophysiological measures with TMS and behavioral measures. Participants in the first group received iTBS to PPC while performing a grasping task concurrently. Participants in the second group received iTBS to PPC while in a task-free, resting state. A third group of participants received iTBS to a parietal region outside the cortical grasping network while performing a grasping task concurrently. We compared changes in motor cortical excitability and motor performance in the three stimulation groups within an hour of each intervention. We found that parietal stimulation during a behavioral manipulation that activates the cortical grasping network increased downstream motor cortical excitability and improved motor performance relative to stimulation during rest. We conclude that constraining the brain state with a behavioral task during brain stimulation has the potential to optimize plasticity induction in cortical circuit mechanisms that mediate movement processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10637360/ /pubmed/37954875 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222 Text en Copyright © 2023 Goldenkoff, Deluisi, Destiny, Lee, Michon, Brissenden, Taylor, Polk and Vesia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Goldenkoff, Elana R. Deluisi, Joseph A. Destiny, Danielle P. Lee, Taraz G. Michon, Katherine J. Brissenden, James A. Taylor, Stephan F. Polk, Thad A. Vesia, Michael The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title | The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title_full | The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title_fullStr | The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title_full_unstemmed | The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title_short | The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
title_sort | behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954875 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goldenkoffelanar thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT deluisijosepha thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT destinydaniellep thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT leetarazg thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT michonkatherinej thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT brissendenjamesa thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT taylorstephanf thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT polkthada thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT vesiamichael thebehavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT goldenkoffelanar behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT deluisijosepha behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT destinydaniellep behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT leetarazg behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT michonkatherinej behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT brissendenjamesa behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT taylorstephanf behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT polkthada behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest AT vesiamichael behavioralandneuraleffectsofparietalthetaburststimulationonthegraspnetworkarestrongerduringagraspingtaskthanatrest |