Cargando…

Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy

Background and study aims Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has proven to be effective compared with colonoscopy alone in an average-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of GI GENIUS, the first marketed real-time AI system in an Italian high-risk population. Methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hassan, Cesare, Povero, Massimiliano, Pradelli, Lorenzo, Spadaccini, Marco, Repici, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2136-3428
_version_ 1785133487645261824
author Hassan, Cesare
Povero, Massimiliano
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Spadaccini, Marco
Repici, Alessandro
author_facet Hassan, Cesare
Povero, Massimiliano
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Spadaccini, Marco
Repici, Alessandro
author_sort Hassan, Cesare
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has proven to be effective compared with colonoscopy alone in an average-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of GI GENIUS, the first marketed real-time AI system in an Italian high-risk population. Methods A 1-year cycle cohort Markov model was developed to simulate the disease evolution of a cohort of Italian individuals positive on fecal immunochemical test (FIT), aged 50 years, undergoing colonoscopy with or without the AI system. Adenoma or colorectal cancer (CRC) were identified according to detection rates specific for each technique. Costs were estimated from the Italian National Health Service perspective. Results Colonoscopy+AI system was dominant with respect to standard colonoscopy. The GI GENIUS system prevented 155 CRC cases (–2.7%), 77 CRC-related deaths (–2.8%), and improved quality of life (+0.027 QALY) with respect to colonoscopy alone. The increase in screening cost (+€10.50) and care for adenoma (+€3.53) was offset by the savings in cost of care for CRC (–€28.37), leading to a total savings of €14.34 per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the cost-efficacy of the AI system (almost 80% probability). Conclusions The implementation of AI detection tools in colonoscopy after patients test FIT-positive seems to be a cost-saving strategy for preventing CRC incidence and mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10637858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106378582023-11-11 Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy Hassan, Cesare Povero, Massimiliano Pradelli, Lorenzo Spadaccini, Marco Repici, Alessandro Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy has proven to be effective compared with colonoscopy alone in an average-risk population. We aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of GI GENIUS, the first marketed real-time AI system in an Italian high-risk population. Methods A 1-year cycle cohort Markov model was developed to simulate the disease evolution of a cohort of Italian individuals positive on fecal immunochemical test (FIT), aged 50 years, undergoing colonoscopy with or without the AI system. Adenoma or colorectal cancer (CRC) were identified according to detection rates specific for each technique. Costs were estimated from the Italian National Health Service perspective. Results Colonoscopy+AI system was dominant with respect to standard colonoscopy. The GI GENIUS system prevented 155 CRC cases (–2.7%), 77 CRC-related deaths (–2.8%), and improved quality of life (+0.027 QALY) with respect to colonoscopy alone. The increase in screening cost (+€10.50) and care for adenoma (+€3.53) was offset by the savings in cost of care for CRC (–€28.37), leading to a total savings of €14.34 per patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the cost-efficacy of the AI system (almost 80% probability). Conclusions The implementation of AI detection tools in colonoscopy after patients test FIT-positive seems to be a cost-saving strategy for preventing CRC incidence and mortality. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10637858/ /pubmed/37954109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2136-3428 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hassan, Cesare
Povero, Massimiliano
Pradelli, Lorenzo
Spadaccini, Marco
Repici, Alessandro
Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title_full Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title_short Cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in Italy
title_sort cost-utility analysis of real-time artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in italy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2136-3428
work_keys_str_mv AT hassancesare costutilityanalysisofrealtimeartificialintelligenceassistedcolonoscopyinitaly
AT poveromassimiliano costutilityanalysisofrealtimeartificialintelligenceassistedcolonoscopyinitaly
AT pradellilorenzo costutilityanalysisofrealtimeartificialintelligenceassistedcolonoscopyinitaly
AT spadaccinimarco costutilityanalysisofrealtimeartificialintelligenceassistedcolonoscopyinitaly
AT repicialessandro costutilityanalysisofrealtimeartificialintelligenceassistedcolonoscopyinitaly