Cargando…

Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis

Waste management is a complex research domain. While the domain is challenging in terms of content, it is also a diverse and cross-disciplinary research subject. One of its important components includes efficient decision-making at various levels and stages. Therefore, Multi-criteria decision-making...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sohail, Shahab Saquib, Javed, Ziya, Nadeem, Mohammad, Anwer, Faisal, Farhat, Faiza, Hussain, Amir, Himeur, Yassine, Madsen, Dag Øivind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21261
_version_ 1785133506787016704
author Sohail, Shahab Saquib
Javed, Ziya
Nadeem, Mohammad
Anwer, Faisal
Farhat, Faiza
Hussain, Amir
Himeur, Yassine
Madsen, Dag Øivind
author_facet Sohail, Shahab Saquib
Javed, Ziya
Nadeem, Mohammad
Anwer, Faisal
Farhat, Faiza
Hussain, Amir
Himeur, Yassine
Madsen, Dag Øivind
author_sort Sohail, Shahab Saquib
collection PubMed
description Waste management is a complex research domain. While the domain is challenging in terms of content, it is also a diverse and cross-disciplinary research subject. One of its important components includes efficient decision-making at various levels and stages. Therefore, Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques have found decent applications in this domain. The field of MCDM techniques-based waste management has been examined using bibliometric analysis in this paper in order to report a systematic overview of the trends and advancements in this area of study. The Scopus database provided 216 publications on the aforementioned subject written between 1992 and 2022. The 216 articles include 56 countries, 158 institutions, and 160 authors. Furthermore, Asian countries, including India, Iran, and China, dominate this field of study. The geographical disparity in the output of publications is visible. Journal of cleaner production, Waste Management and Waste Management and Research are the major journals publishing on MCDM techniques-based waste management research. Given that majority of the articles include multiple authors, it can be said that there is a lot of collaborative research in this area. Overall, the current study provides a thorough analysis of the development in the domain of waste management using MCDM techniques. The trend suggests that it will continue to be a focus of research for academicians, environmentalists and policymakers in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10637942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106379422023-11-11 Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis Sohail, Shahab Saquib Javed, Ziya Nadeem, Mohammad Anwer, Faisal Farhat, Faiza Hussain, Amir Himeur, Yassine Madsen, Dag Øivind Heliyon Review Article Waste management is a complex research domain. While the domain is challenging in terms of content, it is also a diverse and cross-disciplinary research subject. One of its important components includes efficient decision-making at various levels and stages. Therefore, Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques have found decent applications in this domain. The field of MCDM techniques-based waste management has been examined using bibliometric analysis in this paper in order to report a systematic overview of the trends and advancements in this area of study. The Scopus database provided 216 publications on the aforementioned subject written between 1992 and 2022. The 216 articles include 56 countries, 158 institutions, and 160 authors. Furthermore, Asian countries, including India, Iran, and China, dominate this field of study. The geographical disparity in the output of publications is visible. Journal of cleaner production, Waste Management and Waste Management and Research are the major journals publishing on MCDM techniques-based waste management research. Given that majority of the articles include multiple authors, it can be said that there is a lot of collaborative research in this area. Overall, the current study provides a thorough analysis of the development in the domain of waste management using MCDM techniques. The trend suggests that it will continue to be a focus of research for academicians, environmentalists and policymakers in the future. Elsevier 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10637942/ /pubmed/37954357 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21261 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Sohail, Shahab Saquib
Javed, Ziya
Nadeem, Mohammad
Anwer, Faisal
Farhat, Faiza
Hussain, Amir
Himeur, Yassine
Madsen, Dag Øivind
Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title_full Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title_short Multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: A bibliometric analysis
title_sort multi-criteria decision making-based waste management: a bibliometric analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10637942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954357
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21261
work_keys_str_mv AT sohailshahabsaquib multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT javedziya multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT nadeemmohammad multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT anwerfaisal multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT farhatfaiza multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT hussainamir multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT himeuryassine multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis
AT madsendagøivind multicriteriadecisionmakingbasedwastemanagementabibliometricanalysis