Cargando…

Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests

Background Predicting a difficult airway is one of the necessities in anesthesiology practice. Recognition of an obviously difficult airway leads to a series of communication and preparations to assist, as well as the establishment and maintenance of the airway. In this study, we compared various pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trambadia, Dhwani N, Yadav, Payal, A, Sargunaraj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954823
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46868
_version_ 1785133539162849280
author Trambadia, Dhwani N
Yadav, Payal
A, Sargunaraj
author_facet Trambadia, Dhwani N
Yadav, Payal
A, Sargunaraj
author_sort Trambadia, Dhwani N
collection PubMed
description Background Predicting a difficult airway is one of the necessities in anesthesiology practice. Recognition of an obviously difficult airway leads to a series of communication and preparations to assist, as well as the establishment and maintenance of the airway. In this study, we compared various predictors of difficult laryngoscopy/intubation to determine the best possible difficult airway predictors. The present study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the following airway assessment tests to predict difficult airway: (1) Modified Mallamapati test; (2) thyromental distance; (3) inter-incisor gap; (4) upper lip bite test; (5) LEMON airway assessment test; and (6) atlantooccipital movement. Methodology A total of 300 patients who presented for different operative procedures were selected. Screening tests were done in the preoperative examination room. The tests included the Modified Mallamapati test, thyromental distance, upper lip bite test, inter-incisor gap, LEMON airway assessment, and atlantooccipital movement. Laryngoscopy was done in the operation theater and the view was classified according to Cormack-Lehane’s scale. Using this clinical data, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of each test in predicting difficult airways were calculated. Results The thyromental distance test had the highest sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and PPV. LEMON airway assessment test had the lowest specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy. Thyromental distance had the highest accuracy followed by the Modified Mallampati test. Inter-incisor gap had low sensitivity and PPV, and the atlantooccipital extension test had low sensitivity. Conclusions The currently available screening tests for difficult intubation have only poor-to-moderate discriminative power when used alone. No single airway test can provide a high index of sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of difficult airways. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and the thyromental distance test had the highest NPV. Every anesthesiologist must be trained and equipped to deal with now much less common, unexpected failure to intubate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106381072023-11-11 Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests Trambadia, Dhwani N Yadav, Payal A, Sargunaraj Cureus Anesthesiology Background Predicting a difficult airway is one of the necessities in anesthesiology practice. Recognition of an obviously difficult airway leads to a series of communication and preparations to assist, as well as the establishment and maintenance of the airway. In this study, we compared various predictors of difficult laryngoscopy/intubation to determine the best possible difficult airway predictors. The present study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of the following airway assessment tests to predict difficult airway: (1) Modified Mallamapati test; (2) thyromental distance; (3) inter-incisor gap; (4) upper lip bite test; (5) LEMON airway assessment test; and (6) atlantooccipital movement. Methodology A total of 300 patients who presented for different operative procedures were selected. Screening tests were done in the preoperative examination room. The tests included the Modified Mallamapati test, thyromental distance, upper lip bite test, inter-incisor gap, LEMON airway assessment, and atlantooccipital movement. Laryngoscopy was done in the operation theater and the view was classified according to Cormack-Lehane’s scale. Using this clinical data, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of each test in predicting difficult airways were calculated. Results The thyromental distance test had the highest sensitivity, NPV, and accuracy. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and PPV. LEMON airway assessment test had the lowest specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy. Thyromental distance had the highest accuracy followed by the Modified Mallampati test. Inter-incisor gap had low sensitivity and PPV, and the atlantooccipital extension test had low sensitivity. Conclusions The currently available screening tests for difficult intubation have only poor-to-moderate discriminative power when used alone. No single airway test can provide a high index of sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of difficult airways. The upper lip bite test had the highest specificity and the thyromental distance test had the highest NPV. Every anesthesiologist must be trained and equipped to deal with now much less common, unexpected failure to intubate. Cureus 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10638107/ /pubmed/37954823 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46868 Text en Copyright © 2023, Trambadia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Trambadia, Dhwani N
Yadav, Payal
A, Sargunaraj
Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title_full Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title_fullStr Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title_short Preoperative Assessment to Predict Difficult Airway Using Multiple Screening Tests
title_sort preoperative assessment to predict difficult airway using multiple screening tests
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37954823
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46868
work_keys_str_mv AT trambadiadhwanin preoperativeassessmenttopredictdifficultairwayusingmultiplescreeningtests
AT yadavpayal preoperativeassessmenttopredictdifficultairwayusingmultiplescreeningtests
AT asargunaraj preoperativeassessmenttopredictdifficultairwayusingmultiplescreeningtests