Cargando…

Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis

PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, G., Zang, Y., Ding, H., Chen, Y., Groothof, D., Gong, H., Lou, Z., Meng, R., Chen, Z., Furnee, E., Xiang, J., Zhang, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w
_version_ 1785146564946165760
author Sun, G.
Zang, Y.
Ding, H.
Chen, Y.
Groothof, D.
Gong, H.
Lou, Z.
Meng, R.
Chen, Z.
Furnee, E.
Xiang, J.
Zhang, W.
author_facet Sun, G.
Zang, Y.
Ding, H.
Chen, Y.
Groothof, D.
Gong, H.
Lou, Z.
Meng, R.
Chen, Z.
Furnee, E.
Xiang, J.
Zhang, W.
author_sort Sun, G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This study aimed to compare the postoperative anal function and quality of life between the CSPO and ISR. METHOD: Patients with low rectal cancer undergoing CSPO (n = 117) and ISR (n = 66) were included from Changhai and Huashan Hospital, respectively, between 2011 and 2020. A visual analog scale (range 0–10) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction with anal function and quality of life. The anal function was evaluated with Wexner scores and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. RESULTS: The CSPO group had more male patients (65.8% vs. 50%, p = 0.042), more preoperative chemoradiotherapy (33.3% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001), lower tumor position (3.45 ± 1.13 vs. 4.24 ± 0.86 cm, p < 0.001), and more postoperative chemotherapy (65% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001) compared to the ISR group. In addition, CSPO patients had shorter postoperative stay (6.63 ± 2.53 vs. 7.85 ± 4.73 days, p = 0.003) and comparable stoma reversal rates within 1 year after surgery (92.16% vs. 96.97%, p = 0.318). Multivariable analysis showed that CSPO significantly contributed to higher satisfaction with anal function (beta = 1.752, 95% CI 0.776–2.728) and with quality of life (beta = 1.219, 95% CI 0.374–2.064), but not to Wexner, LARS score, or EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. CONCLUSION: CSPO improved the satisfaction with anal function and quality of life but utilized more preoperative chemoradiotherapy. CSPO may be an alternative choice for patients with very low rectal cancers in better physical health and with higher requirements for anal function and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106381802023-11-14 Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis Sun, G. Zang, Y. Ding, H. Chen, Y. Groothof, D. Gong, H. Lou, Z. Meng, R. Chen, Z. Furnee, E. Xiang, J. Zhang, W. Tech Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This study aimed to compare the postoperative anal function and quality of life between the CSPO and ISR. METHOD: Patients with low rectal cancer undergoing CSPO (n = 117) and ISR (n = 66) were included from Changhai and Huashan Hospital, respectively, between 2011 and 2020. A visual analog scale (range 0–10) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction with anal function and quality of life. The anal function was evaluated with Wexner scores and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. RESULTS: The CSPO group had more male patients (65.8% vs. 50%, p = 0.042), more preoperative chemoradiotherapy (33.3% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001), lower tumor position (3.45 ± 1.13 vs. 4.24 ± 0.86 cm, p < 0.001), and more postoperative chemotherapy (65% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001) compared to the ISR group. In addition, CSPO patients had shorter postoperative stay (6.63 ± 2.53 vs. 7.85 ± 4.73 days, p = 0.003) and comparable stoma reversal rates within 1 year after surgery (92.16% vs. 96.97%, p = 0.318). Multivariable analysis showed that CSPO significantly contributed to higher satisfaction with anal function (beta = 1.752, 95% CI 0.776–2.728) and with quality of life (beta = 1.219, 95% CI 0.374–2.064), but not to Wexner, LARS score, or EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. CONCLUSION: CSPO improved the satisfaction with anal function and quality of life but utilized more preoperative chemoradiotherapy. CSPO may be an alternative choice for patients with very low rectal cancers in better physical health and with higher requirements for anal function and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10638180/ /pubmed/37248369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Sun, G.
Zang, Y.
Ding, H.
Chen, Y.
Groothof, D.
Gong, H.
Lou, Z.
Meng, R.
Chen, Z.
Furnee, E.
Xiang, J.
Zhang, W.
Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title_full Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title_short Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
title_sort comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w
work_keys_str_mv AT sung comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT zangy comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT dingh comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT cheny comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT groothofd comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT gongh comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT louz comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT mengr comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT chenz comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT furneee comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT xiangj comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis
AT zhangw comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis