Cargando…
Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis
PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w |
_version_ | 1785146564946165760 |
---|---|
author | Sun, G. Zang, Y. Ding, H. Chen, Y. Groothof, D. Gong, H. Lou, Z. Meng, R. Chen, Z. Furnee, E. Xiang, J. Zhang, W. |
author_facet | Sun, G. Zang, Y. Ding, H. Chen, Y. Groothof, D. Gong, H. Lou, Z. Meng, R. Chen, Z. Furnee, E. Xiang, J. Zhang, W. |
author_sort | Sun, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This study aimed to compare the postoperative anal function and quality of life between the CSPO and ISR. METHOD: Patients with low rectal cancer undergoing CSPO (n = 117) and ISR (n = 66) were included from Changhai and Huashan Hospital, respectively, between 2011 and 2020. A visual analog scale (range 0–10) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction with anal function and quality of life. The anal function was evaluated with Wexner scores and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. RESULTS: The CSPO group had more male patients (65.8% vs. 50%, p = 0.042), more preoperative chemoradiotherapy (33.3% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001), lower tumor position (3.45 ± 1.13 vs. 4.24 ± 0.86 cm, p < 0.001), and more postoperative chemotherapy (65% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001) compared to the ISR group. In addition, CSPO patients had shorter postoperative stay (6.63 ± 2.53 vs. 7.85 ± 4.73 days, p = 0.003) and comparable stoma reversal rates within 1 year after surgery (92.16% vs. 96.97%, p = 0.318). Multivariable analysis showed that CSPO significantly contributed to higher satisfaction with anal function (beta = 1.752, 95% CI 0.776–2.728) and with quality of life (beta = 1.219, 95% CI 0.374–2.064), but not to Wexner, LARS score, or EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. CONCLUSION: CSPO improved the satisfaction with anal function and quality of life but utilized more preoperative chemoradiotherapy. CSPO may be an alternative choice for patients with very low rectal cancers in better physical health and with higher requirements for anal function and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10638180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106381802023-11-14 Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis Sun, G. Zang, Y. Ding, H. Chen, Y. Groothof, D. Gong, H. Lou, Z. Meng, R. Chen, Z. Furnee, E. Xiang, J. Zhang, W. Tech Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: Conformal sphincter preservation operation (CSPO) is a sphincter preservation operation for very low rectal cancers. Compared to intersphincteric resection (ISR), CSPO retains more dentate line and distal rectal wall, and also avoids damaging the nerves in the intersphincteric space. This study aimed to compare the postoperative anal function and quality of life between the CSPO and ISR. METHOD: Patients with low rectal cancer undergoing CSPO (n = 117) and ISR (n = 66) were included from Changhai and Huashan Hospital, respectively, between 2011 and 2020. A visual analog scale (range 0–10) was utilized to evaluate satisfaction with anal function and quality of life. The anal function was evaluated with Wexner scores and low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. Quality of life was evaluated with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. RESULTS: The CSPO group had more male patients (65.8% vs. 50%, p = 0.042), more preoperative chemoradiotherapy (33.3% vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001), lower tumor position (3.45 ± 1.13 vs. 4.24 ± 0.86 cm, p < 0.001), and more postoperative chemotherapy (65% vs. 13.6%, p < 0.001) compared to the ISR group. In addition, CSPO patients had shorter postoperative stay (6.63 ± 2.53 vs. 7.85 ± 4.73 days, p = 0.003) and comparable stoma reversal rates within 1 year after surgery (92.16% vs. 96.97%, p = 0.318). Multivariable analysis showed that CSPO significantly contributed to higher satisfaction with anal function (beta = 1.752, 95% CI 0.776–2.728) and with quality of life (beta = 1.219, 95% CI 0.374–2.064), but not to Wexner, LARS score, or EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38. CONCLUSION: CSPO improved the satisfaction with anal function and quality of life but utilized more preoperative chemoradiotherapy. CSPO may be an alternative choice for patients with very low rectal cancers in better physical health and with higher requirements for anal function and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10638180/ /pubmed/37248369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sun, G. Zang, Y. Ding, H. Chen, Y. Groothof, D. Gong, H. Lou, Z. Meng, R. Chen, Z. Furnee, E. Xiang, J. Zhang, W. Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title | Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title_full | Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title_short | Comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
title_sort | comparison of anal function and quality of life after conformal sphincter preservation operation and intersphincteric resection of very low rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective, case–control analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-023-02819-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sung comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT zangy comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT dingh comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT cheny comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT groothofd comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT gongh comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT louz comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT mengr comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT chenz comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT furneee comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT xiangj comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis AT zhangw comparisonofanalfunctionandqualityoflifeafterconformalsphincterpreservationoperationandintersphinctericresectionofverylowrectalcanceramulticenterretrospectivecasecontrolanalysis |