Cargando…
An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemoth...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3 |
_version_ | 1785146569044000768 |
---|---|
author | Jessen, Bart A. Cornwell, Paul Redmond, Sean Visalli, Thomas Lemper, Marie Bunch, Todd Hart, Timothy |
author_facet | Jessen, Bart A. Cornwell, Paul Redmond, Sean Visalli, Thomas Lemper, Marie Bunch, Todd Hart, Timothy |
author_sort | Jessen, Bart A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents using the rodent STD(10) or non-rodent HNSTD and an appropriate safety factor. With the increase in molecularly targeted chemotherapeutics, it is prudent to re-evaluate how the FIP dose is derived to ensure that the appropriate balance between risk and therapeutic benefit to the patient is achieved. Blinded data on 92 small molecule oncology compounds from 12 pharmaceutical companies who are members of the IQ DruSafe consortium were gathered to investigate if a NOAEL-based starting dose without a safety factor would have been tolerated in the FIP trial and if so, estimating how many dose escalation cohorts could have been reduced. Our analysis suggests that the NOAEL-based alternative starting dose would have been tolerated in most cases evaluated, with an anticipated mean reduction of 2.3 cohorts. Of the 12 cases where the alternative approach resulted in a starting dose that would have exceeded the MTD/RP2D, none of the nonclinical toxicities in these cases were considered irreversible and would be monitorable in all but one instance. Most non-tolerated cases were within two–threefold of the MTD/RP2D, with the clinical AEs considered manageable and mitigated by dose de-escalation. No one method of FIP dose calculation will likely be appropriate for all oncology small molecules and starting dose selection should be performed using a case-by-case approach. However, the NOAEL-based method that does not utilize a safety factor should be considered when appropriate to minimize the number of patients exposed to sub-therapeutic doses of an investigational oncology agent and accelerating development to RP2D. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10638197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106381972023-11-14 An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose Jessen, Bart A. Cornwell, Paul Redmond, Sean Visalli, Thomas Lemper, Marie Bunch, Todd Hart, Timothy Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents using the rodent STD(10) or non-rodent HNSTD and an appropriate safety factor. With the increase in molecularly targeted chemotherapeutics, it is prudent to re-evaluate how the FIP dose is derived to ensure that the appropriate balance between risk and therapeutic benefit to the patient is achieved. Blinded data on 92 small molecule oncology compounds from 12 pharmaceutical companies who are members of the IQ DruSafe consortium were gathered to investigate if a NOAEL-based starting dose without a safety factor would have been tolerated in the FIP trial and if so, estimating how many dose escalation cohorts could have been reduced. Our analysis suggests that the NOAEL-based alternative starting dose would have been tolerated in most cases evaluated, with an anticipated mean reduction of 2.3 cohorts. Of the 12 cases where the alternative approach resulted in a starting dose that would have exceeded the MTD/RP2D, none of the nonclinical toxicities in these cases were considered irreversible and would be monitorable in all but one instance. Most non-tolerated cases were within two–threefold of the MTD/RP2D, with the clinical AEs considered manageable and mitigated by dose de-escalation. No one method of FIP dose calculation will likely be appropriate for all oncology small molecules and starting dose selection should be performed using a case-by-case approach. However, the NOAEL-based method that does not utilize a safety factor should be considered when appropriate to minimize the number of patients exposed to sub-therapeutic doses of an investigational oncology agent and accelerating development to RP2D. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10638197/ /pubmed/37505272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jessen, Bart A. Cornwell, Paul Redmond, Sean Visalli, Thomas Lemper, Marie Bunch, Todd Hart, Timothy An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title | An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title_full | An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title_fullStr | An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title_full_unstemmed | An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title_short | An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
title_sort | iq consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative noael-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jessenbarta aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT cornwellpaul aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT redmondsean aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT visallithomas aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT lempermarie aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT bunchtodd aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT harttimothy aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT jessenbarta iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT cornwellpaul iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT redmondsean iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT visallithomas iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT lempermarie iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT bunchtodd iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose AT harttimothy iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose |