Cargando…

An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose

The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemoth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessen, Bart A., Cornwell, Paul, Redmond, Sean, Visalli, Thomas, Lemper, Marie, Bunch, Todd, Hart, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3
_version_ 1785146569044000768
author Jessen, Bart A.
Cornwell, Paul
Redmond, Sean
Visalli, Thomas
Lemper, Marie
Bunch, Todd
Hart, Timothy
author_facet Jessen, Bart A.
Cornwell, Paul
Redmond, Sean
Visalli, Thomas
Lemper, Marie
Bunch, Todd
Hart, Timothy
author_sort Jessen, Bart A.
collection PubMed
description The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents using the rodent STD(10) or non-rodent HNSTD and an appropriate safety factor. With the increase in molecularly targeted chemotherapeutics, it is prudent to re-evaluate how the FIP dose is derived to ensure that the appropriate balance between risk and therapeutic benefit to the patient is achieved. Blinded data on 92 small molecule oncology compounds from 12 pharmaceutical companies who are members of the IQ DruSafe consortium were gathered to investigate if a NOAEL-based starting dose without a safety factor would have been tolerated in the FIP trial and if so, estimating how many dose escalation cohorts could have been reduced. Our analysis suggests that the NOAEL-based alternative starting dose would have been tolerated in most cases evaluated, with an anticipated mean reduction of 2.3 cohorts. Of the 12 cases where the alternative approach resulted in a starting dose that would have exceeded the MTD/RP2D, none of the nonclinical toxicities in these cases were considered irreversible and would be monitorable in all but one instance. Most non-tolerated cases were within two–threefold of the MTD/RP2D, with the clinical AEs considered manageable and mitigated by dose de-escalation. No one method of FIP dose calculation will likely be appropriate for all oncology small molecules and starting dose selection should be performed using a case-by-case approach. However, the NOAEL-based method that does not utilize a safety factor should be considered when appropriate to minimize the number of patients exposed to sub-therapeutic doses of an investigational oncology agent and accelerating development to RP2D. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106381972023-11-14 An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose Jessen, Bart A. Cornwell, Paul Redmond, Sean Visalli, Thomas Lemper, Marie Bunch, Todd Hart, Timothy Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Original Article The first-in-patient (FIP) starting dose for oncology agents should be reasonably safe and provide potential therapeutic benefit to the patient. For late-stage oncology patients, this dose is often based on the ICH S9 guidance, which was developed primarily based on experience with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents using the rodent STD(10) or non-rodent HNSTD and an appropriate safety factor. With the increase in molecularly targeted chemotherapeutics, it is prudent to re-evaluate how the FIP dose is derived to ensure that the appropriate balance between risk and therapeutic benefit to the patient is achieved. Blinded data on 92 small molecule oncology compounds from 12 pharmaceutical companies who are members of the IQ DruSafe consortium were gathered to investigate if a NOAEL-based starting dose without a safety factor would have been tolerated in the FIP trial and if so, estimating how many dose escalation cohorts could have been reduced. Our analysis suggests that the NOAEL-based alternative starting dose would have been tolerated in most cases evaluated, with an anticipated mean reduction of 2.3 cohorts. Of the 12 cases where the alternative approach resulted in a starting dose that would have exceeded the MTD/RP2D, none of the nonclinical toxicities in these cases were considered irreversible and would be monitorable in all but one instance. Most non-tolerated cases were within two–threefold of the MTD/RP2D, with the clinical AEs considered manageable and mitigated by dose de-escalation. No one method of FIP dose calculation will likely be appropriate for all oncology small molecules and starting dose selection should be performed using a case-by-case approach. However, the NOAEL-based method that does not utilize a safety factor should be considered when appropriate to minimize the number of patients exposed to sub-therapeutic doses of an investigational oncology agent and accelerating development to RP2D. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10638197/ /pubmed/37505272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Jessen, Bart A.
Cornwell, Paul
Redmond, Sean
Visalli, Thomas
Lemper, Marie
Bunch, Todd
Hart, Timothy
An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title_full An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title_fullStr An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title_full_unstemmed An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title_short An IQ consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative NOAEL-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
title_sort iq consortium analysis of starting dose selection for oncology small molecule first-in-patient trials suggests an alternative noael-based method can be safe while reducing time to the recommended phase 2 dose
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37505272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04570-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jessenbarta aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT cornwellpaul aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT redmondsean aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT visallithomas aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT lempermarie aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT bunchtodd aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT harttimothy aniqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT jessenbarta iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT cornwellpaul iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT redmondsean iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT visallithomas iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT lempermarie iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT bunchtodd iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose
AT harttimothy iqconsortiumanalysisofstartingdoseselectionforoncologysmallmoleculefirstinpatienttrialssuggestsanalternativenoaelbasedmethodcanbesafewhilereducingtimetotherecommendedphase2dose