Cargando…
Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of panoramic ultrasound (US) imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing the average lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area between the lumbar vertebral bodies L3–L5 (i.e., LMF ACSA(L3–L5)). US and MRI...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37949957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46987-z |
_version_ | 1785133567459721216 |
---|---|
author | Fitze, Daniel P. Franchi, Martino V. Peterhans, Loris Frey, Walter O. Spörri, Jörg |
author_facet | Fitze, Daniel P. Franchi, Martino V. Peterhans, Loris Frey, Walter O. Spörri, Jörg |
author_sort | Fitze, Daniel P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of panoramic ultrasound (US) imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing the average lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area between the lumbar vertebral bodies L3–L5 (i.e., LMF ACSA(L3–L5)). US and MRI scans of 20 male youth competitive alpine skiers were collected. To test the intra- and interrater reliability of US, transversal panoramic scans were analyzed on two different days by the same rater and the analysis of the first day was compared with the analysis of a second rater. To examine the agreement between US and MRI, Bland–Altman analysis was performed. Intrarater reliability was excellent, and interrater reliability was weak to good for both sides. The bias between MRI and US was − 0.19 ± 0.90 cm(2) (2.68 ± 12.30%) for the left side and − 0.04 ± 0.98 cm(2) (− 1.11 ± 12.93%) for the right side (i.e., for both sides US slightly overestimated LMF ACSA(L3–L5) on average). The limits of agreement were − 1.95 to 1.57 cm(2) (− 26.70 to 21.30%) for the left side and − 1.95 to 1.88 cm(2) (− 26.46 to 24.24%) for the right side. Panoramic US imaging may be considered a method with excellent intrarater and weak to good interrater reliability for assessing LMF ACSA(L3–L5). Comparison with MRI showed large individual differences in some cases, but an acceptable bias between the two imaging modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10638285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106382852023-11-11 Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area Fitze, Daniel P. Franchi, Martino V. Peterhans, Loris Frey, Walter O. Spörri, Jörg Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of panoramic ultrasound (US) imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing the average lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area between the lumbar vertebral bodies L3–L5 (i.e., LMF ACSA(L3–L5)). US and MRI scans of 20 male youth competitive alpine skiers were collected. To test the intra- and interrater reliability of US, transversal panoramic scans were analyzed on two different days by the same rater and the analysis of the first day was compared with the analysis of a second rater. To examine the agreement between US and MRI, Bland–Altman analysis was performed. Intrarater reliability was excellent, and interrater reliability was weak to good for both sides. The bias between MRI and US was − 0.19 ± 0.90 cm(2) (2.68 ± 12.30%) for the left side and − 0.04 ± 0.98 cm(2) (− 1.11 ± 12.93%) for the right side (i.e., for both sides US slightly overestimated LMF ACSA(L3–L5) on average). The limits of agreement were − 1.95 to 1.57 cm(2) (− 26.70 to 21.30%) for the left side and − 1.95 to 1.88 cm(2) (− 26.46 to 24.24%) for the right side. Panoramic US imaging may be considered a method with excellent intrarater and weak to good interrater reliability for assessing LMF ACSA(L3–L5). Comparison with MRI showed large individual differences in some cases, but an acceptable bias between the two imaging modalities. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10638285/ /pubmed/37949957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46987-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Fitze, Daniel P. Franchi, Martino V. Peterhans, Loris Frey, Walter O. Spörri, Jörg Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title | Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title_full | Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title_fullStr | Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title_short | Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
title_sort | reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging and agreement with magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of lumbar multifidus anatomical cross-sectional area |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37949957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46987-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzedanielp reliabilityofpanoramicultrasoundimagingandagreementwithmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentoflumbarmultifidusanatomicalcrosssectionalarea AT franchimartinov reliabilityofpanoramicultrasoundimagingandagreementwithmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentoflumbarmultifidusanatomicalcrosssectionalarea AT peterhansloris reliabilityofpanoramicultrasoundimagingandagreementwithmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentoflumbarmultifidusanatomicalcrosssectionalarea AT freywaltero reliabilityofpanoramicultrasoundimagingandagreementwithmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentoflumbarmultifidusanatomicalcrosssectionalarea AT sporrijorg reliabilityofpanoramicultrasoundimagingandagreementwithmagneticresonanceimagingfortheassessmentoflumbarmultifidusanatomicalcrosssectionalarea |