Cargando…
A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs
Cathodic protection as a complementary method is one of the most effective ways to prevent corrosion, along with coating and choosing the suitable material. There are different ways to protect the storage tank bottom. Due to the presence of the geo membrane layer and its effective and pivotal role,...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37949897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44759-3 |
_version_ | 1785133588767834112 |
---|---|
author | Shirshahi, Mohammad Javad Chini, Seyed Farshid Taheri, Peyman Mansouri, Abraham |
author_facet | Shirshahi, Mohammad Javad Chini, Seyed Farshid Taheri, Peyman Mansouri, Abraham |
author_sort | Shirshahi, Mohammad Javad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cathodic protection as a complementary method is one of the most effective ways to prevent corrosion, along with coating and choosing the suitable material. There are different ways to protect the storage tank bottom. Due to the presence of the geo membrane layer and its effective and pivotal role, the use of mixed metal oxide (MMO) anodes is highly recommended. In the current study, the protection process of the above-ground storage tank bottom is simulated using MMO backfilled wire (concentric rings) and ribbon anodes (mesh grid system). In this regard, several parameters must be considered in reaching the protection criteria. The simulation results show that the effect of the limiting oxygen current density, soil resistivity and the anodic current have the greatest role. Anode depth and the spacing between the anodes are also critical factors if they have large values. Due to the importance of the number of conductor bars and feeding cables, two configurations have been presented for ribbon anodes. These configurations have a direct impact on grid resistance, rectifier size, and related costs. Finally, an economic comparison has been made regarding the use of sacrificial and MMO anodes in the form of ribbon next to wire anodes. The results show that, in the use of ribbon anodes, MMO anodes have better performance than magnesium and zinc sacrificial anodes, and the cost required for MMO linear anodes is far lower than the method of sacrificial ribbon anodes. In the present study, the cost of the MMO linear anode system is approximately 20% of zinc and magnesium sacrificial ribbon anode system cost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10638400 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106384002023-11-11 A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs Shirshahi, Mohammad Javad Chini, Seyed Farshid Taheri, Peyman Mansouri, Abraham Sci Rep Article Cathodic protection as a complementary method is one of the most effective ways to prevent corrosion, along with coating and choosing the suitable material. There are different ways to protect the storage tank bottom. Due to the presence of the geo membrane layer and its effective and pivotal role, the use of mixed metal oxide (MMO) anodes is highly recommended. In the current study, the protection process of the above-ground storage tank bottom is simulated using MMO backfilled wire (concentric rings) and ribbon anodes (mesh grid system). In this regard, several parameters must be considered in reaching the protection criteria. The simulation results show that the effect of the limiting oxygen current density, soil resistivity and the anodic current have the greatest role. Anode depth and the spacing between the anodes are also critical factors if they have large values. Due to the importance of the number of conductor bars and feeding cables, two configurations have been presented for ribbon anodes. These configurations have a direct impact on grid resistance, rectifier size, and related costs. Finally, an economic comparison has been made regarding the use of sacrificial and MMO anodes in the form of ribbon next to wire anodes. The results show that, in the use of ribbon anodes, MMO anodes have better performance than magnesium and zinc sacrificial anodes, and the cost required for MMO linear anodes is far lower than the method of sacrificial ribbon anodes. In the present study, the cost of the MMO linear anode system is approximately 20% of zinc and magnesium sacrificial ribbon anode system cost. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10638400/ /pubmed/37949897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44759-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Shirshahi, Mohammad Javad Chini, Seyed Farshid Taheri, Peyman Mansouri, Abraham A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title | A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title_full | A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title_fullStr | A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title_short | A comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
title_sort | comparative numerical evaluation of linear anode arrangements for enhancing above ground storage tank cathodic protection via mesh grid and concentric ring designs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638400/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37949897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44759-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirshahimohammadjavad acomparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT chiniseyedfarshid acomparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT taheripeyman acomparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT mansouriabraham acomparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT shirshahimohammadjavad comparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT chiniseyedfarshid comparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT taheripeyman comparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns AT mansouriabraham comparativenumericalevaluationoflinearanodearrangementsforenhancingabovegroundstoragetankcathodicprotectionviameshgridandconcentricringdesigns |