Cargando…

Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Leigh, White, Paul, Jeevan, Ranjeet, Browne, John, Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel, O’Donoghue, Joe, Mohiuddin, Syed, Hollingworth, William, Fairbrother, Patricia, MacKenzie, Mairead, Holcombe, Chris, Potter, Shelley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad276
_version_ 1785146580818460672
author Johnson, Leigh
White, Paul
Jeevan, Ranjeet
Browne, John
Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel
O’Donoghue, Joe
Mohiuddin, Syed
Hollingworth, William
Fairbrother, Patricia
MacKenzie, Mairead
Holcombe, Chris
Potter, Shelley
author_facet Johnson, Leigh
White, Paul
Jeevan, Ranjeet
Browne, John
Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel
O’Donoghue, Joe
Mohiuddin, Syed
Hollingworth, William
Fairbrother, Patricia
MacKenzie, Mairead
Holcombe, Chris
Potter, Shelley
author_sort Johnson, Leigh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Women who underwent mastectomy with IBR for breast cancer in England between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Surviving women were invited to complete the BREAST-Q, EQ-5D-5L™, and ICECAP-A at least 12 years after the index procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to developers’ instructions and compared by IBR type. RESULTS: Some 1236 women underwent IBR; 343 (27.8 per cent) had 2-stage expander/implant, 630 (51.0 per cent) latissimus dorsi, and 263 (21.3 per cent) abdominal flap reconstructions, with a mean(s.d.) follow-up of 13.3(0.5) years. Women who underwent abdominal flap reconstruction reported higher scores in all BREAST-Q domains than those who had other procedures. These differences remained statistically significant and clinically meaningful after adjusting for age, ethnicity, geographical region, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, and complications. The greatest difference was seen in scores for satisfaction with breasts; women who had abdominal flap reconstructions reported scores that were 13.17 (95 per cent c.i. 9.48 to 16.87) points; P < 0.001) higher than those among women who had two-stage expander/implant procedures. Women who underwent latissimus dorsi reconstruction reported significantly more pain/discomfort on the EQ-5D-5L™, but no other differences between procedures were seen. CONCLUSION: Long-term patient-reported outcomes are significantly better following abdominal flap reconstruction than other traditional procedure types. These findings should be shared with women considering IBR to help them make informed decisions about their surgical options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638530
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106385302023-11-15 Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study Johnson, Leigh White, Paul Jeevan, Ranjeet Browne, John Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel O’Donoghue, Joe Mohiuddin, Syed Hollingworth, William Fairbrother, Patricia MacKenzie, Mairead Holcombe, Chris Potter, Shelley Br J Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a population-based cohort. METHODS: Women who underwent mastectomy with IBR for breast cancer in England between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Surviving women were invited to complete the BREAST-Q, EQ-5D-5L™, and ICECAP-A at least 12 years after the index procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to developers’ instructions and compared by IBR type. RESULTS: Some 1236 women underwent IBR; 343 (27.8 per cent) had 2-stage expander/implant, 630 (51.0 per cent) latissimus dorsi, and 263 (21.3 per cent) abdominal flap reconstructions, with a mean(s.d.) follow-up of 13.3(0.5) years. Women who underwent abdominal flap reconstruction reported higher scores in all BREAST-Q domains than those who had other procedures. These differences remained statistically significant and clinically meaningful after adjusting for age, ethnicity, geographical region, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, and complications. The greatest difference was seen in scores for satisfaction with breasts; women who had abdominal flap reconstructions reported scores that were 13.17 (95 per cent c.i. 9.48 to 16.87) points; P < 0.001) higher than those among women who had two-stage expander/implant procedures. Women who underwent latissimus dorsi reconstruction reported significantly more pain/discomfort on the EQ-5D-5L™, but no other differences between procedures were seen. CONCLUSION: Long-term patient-reported outcomes are significantly better following abdominal flap reconstruction than other traditional procedure types. These findings should be shared with women considering IBR to help them make informed decisions about their surgical options. Oxford University Press 2023-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10638530/ /pubmed/37766501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad276 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Johnson, Leigh
White, Paul
Jeevan, Ranjeet
Browne, John
Gulliver-Clarke, Carmel
O’Donoghue, Joe
Mohiuddin, Syed
Hollingworth, William
Fairbrother, Patricia
MacKenzie, Mairead
Holcombe, Chris
Potter, Shelley
Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title_full Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title_fullStr Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title_short Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
title_sort long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638530/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37766501
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad276
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonleigh longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT whitepaul longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT jeevanranjeet longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT brownejohn longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT gulliverclarkecarmel longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT odonoghuejoe longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT mohiuddinsyed longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT hollingworthwilliam longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT fairbrotherpatricia longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT mackenziemairead longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT holcombechris longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy
AT pottershelley longtermpatientreportedoutcomesofimmediatebreastreconstructionaftermastectomyforbreastcancerpopulationbasedcohortstudy