Cargando…

Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments

BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major (PM) tears have been shown to occur most frequently at the tendinous humeral insertion. However, no substantial updates on tear location have been published in 20 years or are based on relatively small sample sizes. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate PM te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlos, Noel Bien T., Drain, Nicholas P., Fatora, Gabrielle C., Nazzal, Ehab M., Herman, Zachary J., Hughes, Jonathan D., Rodosky, Mark W., Lin, Albert, Lesniak, Bryson P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.019
_version_ 1785146589306683392
author Carlos, Noel Bien T.
Drain, Nicholas P.
Fatora, Gabrielle C.
Nazzal, Ehab M.
Herman, Zachary J.
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Rodosky, Mark W.
Lin, Albert
Lesniak, Bryson P.
author_facet Carlos, Noel Bien T.
Drain, Nicholas P.
Fatora, Gabrielle C.
Nazzal, Ehab M.
Herman, Zachary J.
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Rodosky, Mark W.
Lin, Albert
Lesniak, Bryson P.
author_sort Carlos, Noel Bien T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major (PM) tears have been shown to occur most frequently at the tendinous humeral insertion. However, no substantial updates on tear location have been published in 20 years or are based on relatively small sample sizes. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate PM tear location based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A secondary purpose was to evaluate agreement between MRI and intraoperative assessments of tear characteristics. We hypothesized that PM tears at the myotendinous junction (MTJ) occur at a higher rate than previously reported and that intraoperative and MRI assessments would demonstrate agreement in at least 80% of cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study of consecutive patients evaluated for a PM tear at a single institution between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. Patient demographics as well as MRI and intraoperative assessments of tear location, extent of tear, and muscle head involvement were collected from the electronic medical record. Agreement was calculated by comparing radiographic and intraoperative assessments per variable and reported as percentages. Data and statistical analysis were performed with SPSS software with a significance level set to P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included for analysis. Mean age was 35.8 ± 10.5 years and mean body mass index was 29.4 ± 4.8 kg/m(2). 60.4% of the study population had tears of the MTJ, 34.9% of the tendinous humeral insertion, and 4.7% within the muscle belly, as determined intraoperatively. Complete tears had significantly higher agreement between MRI and intraoperative assessments relative to partial tears (83.9% and 62.5%, respectively; P ≤ .01). DISCUSSION: The majority of PM tears occurred at the MTJ. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative assessments agreed in 80% of cases, a value that was significantly higher for complete over partial tears. These findings demonstrate that tears of the MTJ are increasingly more common and support the use of MRI in preoperative planning for complete PM tears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106385702023-11-15 Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments Carlos, Noel Bien T. Drain, Nicholas P. Fatora, Gabrielle C. Nazzal, Ehab M. Herman, Zachary J. Hughes, Jonathan D. Rodosky, Mark W. Lin, Albert Lesniak, Bryson P. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Pectoralis major (PM) tears have been shown to occur most frequently at the tendinous humeral insertion. However, no substantial updates on tear location have been published in 20 years or are based on relatively small sample sizes. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate PM tear location based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A secondary purpose was to evaluate agreement between MRI and intraoperative assessments of tear characteristics. We hypothesized that PM tears at the myotendinous junction (MTJ) occur at a higher rate than previously reported and that intraoperative and MRI assessments would demonstrate agreement in at least 80% of cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational study of consecutive patients evaluated for a PM tear at a single institution between 2010 and 2022 was conducted. Patient demographics as well as MRI and intraoperative assessments of tear location, extent of tear, and muscle head involvement were collected from the electronic medical record. Agreement was calculated by comparing radiographic and intraoperative assessments per variable and reported as percentages. Data and statistical analysis were performed with SPSS software with a significance level set to P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included for analysis. Mean age was 35.8 ± 10.5 years and mean body mass index was 29.4 ± 4.8 kg/m(2). 60.4% of the study population had tears of the MTJ, 34.9% of the tendinous humeral insertion, and 4.7% within the muscle belly, as determined intraoperatively. Complete tears had significantly higher agreement between MRI and intraoperative assessments relative to partial tears (83.9% and 62.5%, respectively; P ≤ .01). DISCUSSION: The majority of PM tears occurred at the MTJ. Preoperative MRI and intraoperative assessments agreed in 80% of cases, a value that was significantly higher for complete over partial tears. These findings demonstrate that tears of the MTJ are increasingly more common and support the use of MRI in preoperative planning for complete PM tears. Elsevier 2023-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10638570/ /pubmed/37969514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.019 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Carlos, Noel Bien T.
Drain, Nicholas P.
Fatora, Gabrielle C.
Nazzal, Ehab M.
Herman, Zachary J.
Hughes, Jonathan D.
Rodosky, Mark W.
Lin, Albert
Lesniak, Bryson P.
Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title_full Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title_fullStr Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title_full_unstemmed Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title_short Myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
title_sort myotendinous junction tears of the pectoralis major are occurring more frequently and discrepancies exist between intraoperative and radiographic assessments
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.019
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosnoelbient myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT drainnicholasp myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT fatoragabriellec myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT nazzalehabm myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT hermanzacharyj myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT hughesjonathand myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT rodoskymarkw myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT linalbert myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments
AT lesniakbrysonp myotendinousjunctiontearsofthepectoralismajorareoccurringmorefrequentlyanddiscrepanciesexistbetweenintraoperativeandradiographicassessments