Cargando…

No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes and complications after a two- vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from our institutional database on 960 patients treated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alben, Matthew G., Gambhir, Neil, Kingery, Matthew T., Halpern, Robert, Papalia, Aidan G., Kwon, Young W., Zuckerman, Joseph D., Virk, Mandeep S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.015
_version_ 1785146594349285376
author Alben, Matthew G.
Gambhir, Neil
Kingery, Matthew T.
Halpern, Robert
Papalia, Aidan G.
Kwon, Young W.
Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Virk, Mandeep S.
author_facet Alben, Matthew G.
Gambhir, Neil
Kingery, Matthew T.
Halpern, Robert
Papalia, Aidan G.
Kwon, Young W.
Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Virk, Mandeep S.
author_sort Alben, Matthew G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes and complications after a two- vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from our institutional database on 960 patients treated by primary rTSA between 2011 and 2021. Patients were separated into two cohorts of postoperative sling immobilization (a two-week and six-week group). Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate what factors were associated with patients experiencing either a postoperative complication or requiring reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were instructed to keep their operative arm in a sling for six weeks postoperatively, and 684 patients discontinued use at two weeks. There was no difference in postoperative complication rate (15.0% vs. 12.0%, P = .21), dislocation rate (P = .79), acromion stress fractures (P = .06), implant loosening (P = .15), and periprosthetic joint infections (P = .48) between the six- and two-week sling cohorts. In the immediate 90-day postoperative time period, no difference was seen in the reoperation rates (P = .73). DISCUSSION: Shorter duration of sling immobilization (two weeks) does not incur additional risk of complications compared to standard duration (six weeks) of sling immobilization following rTSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106385912023-11-15 No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty Alben, Matthew G. Gambhir, Neil Kingery, Matthew T. Halpern, Robert Papalia, Aidan G. Kwon, Young W. Zuckerman, Joseph D. Virk, Mandeep S. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes and complications after a two- vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from our institutional database on 960 patients treated by primary rTSA between 2011 and 2021. Patients were separated into two cohorts of postoperative sling immobilization (a two-week and six-week group). Multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate what factors were associated with patients experiencing either a postoperative complication or requiring reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were instructed to keep their operative arm in a sling for six weeks postoperatively, and 684 patients discontinued use at two weeks. There was no difference in postoperative complication rate (15.0% vs. 12.0%, P = .21), dislocation rate (P = .79), acromion stress fractures (P = .06), implant loosening (P = .15), and periprosthetic joint infections (P = .48) between the six- and two-week sling cohorts. In the immediate 90-day postoperative time period, no difference was seen in the reoperation rates (P = .73). DISCUSSION: Shorter duration of sling immobilization (two weeks) does not incur additional risk of complications compared to standard duration (six weeks) of sling immobilization following rTSA. Elsevier 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10638591/ /pubmed/37969500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.015 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Alben, Matthew G.
Gambhir, Neil
Kingery, Matthew T.
Halpern, Robert
Papalia, Aidan G.
Kwon, Young W.
Zuckerman, Joseph D.
Virk, Mandeep S.
No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_short No difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort no difference in complications between two-week vs. six-week duration of sling immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.015
work_keys_str_mv AT albenmatthewg nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT gambhirneil nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT kingerymatthewt nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT halpernrobert nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT papaliaaidang nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT kwonyoungw nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT zuckermanjosephd nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty
AT virkmandeeps nodifferenceincomplicationsbetweentwoweekvssixweekdurationofslingimmobilizationafterreversetotalshoulderarthroplasty