Cargando…

Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections

BACKGROUND: To successfully treat a periprosthetic infection, successful bacteria eradication and successful wound closure are mandatory. Despite adequate surgical débridement in the deep, persistence of wound drainage and subsequent persistence of periprosthetic infection may occur, especially in p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grubhofer, Florian, O’Donnell, Evan, Ernstbrunner, Lukas, Uçkay, Ilker, Wieser, Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.007
_version_ 1785146596655104000
author Grubhofer, Florian
O’Donnell, Evan
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Uçkay, Ilker
Wieser, Karl
author_facet Grubhofer, Florian
O’Donnell, Evan
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Uçkay, Ilker
Wieser, Karl
author_sort Grubhofer, Florian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To successfully treat a periprosthetic infection, successful bacteria eradication and successful wound closure are mandatory. Despite adequate surgical débridement in the deep, persistence of wound drainage and subsequent persistence of periprosthetic infection may occur, especially in patients with compromised soft tissue conditions. This study presents a transcutaneous compression suture technique with iodine gauze that was used in patients with persistent wound secretion in therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections in order to achieve successful infection control and wound healing. METHODS: All patients with persistent periprosthetic or implant-associated shoulder joint infections despite correct previous surgical and antibiotic therapy attempts were included in the study. In all patients, in addition to repeat deep surgical débridement, a transcutaneous “iodine-gauze-compression-suture” was performed with postoperative antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was infection control; the secondary endpoint was wound healing rate; and the third endpoint was complication rate after index surgery. RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients with a mean age of 74 (±7.6) years and a mean follow-up of 14 (±2) months were included. All ten patients showed infection control and successful wound healing, with no need for further revision surgery. In 8 out of 10 patients, the wound healing was fast and completely uncomplicated. Two out of 10 patients showed delayed wound healing with fibrin coatings for 3 and 4 weeks, respectively. No additional intervention was necessary in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous iodine gauze compression sutures were used to achieve successful infection control without additional revision surgery in 10 out of 10 patients who previously underwent surgery with failed infection control. This wound closure technique is a reliable adjunctive therapy method in the treatment of implant-associated infections of the shoulder in patients with fragile wound conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10638609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106386092023-11-15 Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections Grubhofer, Florian O’Donnell, Evan Ernstbrunner, Lukas Uçkay, Ilker Wieser, Karl JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: To successfully treat a periprosthetic infection, successful bacteria eradication and successful wound closure are mandatory. Despite adequate surgical débridement in the deep, persistence of wound drainage and subsequent persistence of periprosthetic infection may occur, especially in patients with compromised soft tissue conditions. This study presents a transcutaneous compression suture technique with iodine gauze that was used in patients with persistent wound secretion in therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections in order to achieve successful infection control and wound healing. METHODS: All patients with persistent periprosthetic or implant-associated shoulder joint infections despite correct previous surgical and antibiotic therapy attempts were included in the study. In all patients, in addition to repeat deep surgical débridement, a transcutaneous “iodine-gauze-compression-suture” was performed with postoperative antibiotic therapy. The primary endpoint was infection control; the secondary endpoint was wound healing rate; and the third endpoint was complication rate after index surgery. RESULTS: Ten consecutive patients with a mean age of 74 (±7.6) years and a mean follow-up of 14 (±2) months were included. All ten patients showed infection control and successful wound healing, with no need for further revision surgery. In 8 out of 10 patients, the wound healing was fast and completely uncomplicated. Two out of 10 patients showed delayed wound healing with fibrin coatings for 3 and 4 weeks, respectively. No additional intervention was necessary in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: Transcutaneous iodine gauze compression sutures were used to achieve successful infection control without additional revision surgery in 10 out of 10 patients who previously underwent surgery with failed infection control. This wound closure technique is a reliable adjunctive therapy method in the treatment of implant-associated infections of the shoulder in patients with fragile wound conditions. Elsevier 2023-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10638609/ /pubmed/37969515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.007 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Grubhofer, Florian
O’Donnell, Evan
Ernstbrunner, Lukas
Uçkay, Ilker
Wieser, Karl
Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title_full Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title_fullStr Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title_short Transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
title_sort transcutaneous compression suture with iodine gauze for wound closure in revision surgery for therapy-resistant periprosthetic shoulder infections
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10638609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT grubhoferflorian transcutaneouscompressionsuturewithiodinegauzeforwoundclosureinrevisionsurgeryfortherapyresistantperiprostheticshoulderinfections
AT odonnellevan transcutaneouscompressionsuturewithiodinegauzeforwoundclosureinrevisionsurgeryfortherapyresistantperiprostheticshoulderinfections
AT ernstbrunnerlukas transcutaneouscompressionsuturewithiodinegauzeforwoundclosureinrevisionsurgeryfortherapyresistantperiprostheticshoulderinfections
AT uckayilker transcutaneouscompressionsuturewithiodinegauzeforwoundclosureinrevisionsurgeryfortherapyresistantperiprostheticshoulderinfections
AT wieserkarl transcutaneouscompressionsuturewithiodinegauzeforwoundclosureinrevisionsurgeryfortherapyresistantperiprostheticshoulderinfections