Supercharged End-to-Side Nerve Transfer for Ulnar Neuropathy: Redefining Nomenclature and Recommendations for Standardisation of Surgical Technique Description

Supercharged end-to-side (SETS) nerve transfers have been described as a treatment option for ulnar neuropathy, however, there is inconsistency in the nomenclature used to describe the microsurgical technique. The purpose of this article is to systematically review the available literature on the SETS nerve transfer technique and to provide an overview of the technical variations to facilitate standardisation of surgical method. A literature review was performed through PubMed, MEDLINE, and Ovid databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that reported surgical technique of anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar nerve SETS transfer were included. Studies were excluded when not referencing SETS/reverse end-to-side (RETS) nerve transfers, studies referencing nerve transfers other than AIN to motor fascicle bundle of the ulnar nerve (MUN), animal studies, and studies not reporting technique. Of the 168 studies found, 14 articles were included. In five articles, distal visualisation of the MUN in Guyon’s canal was specifically cited. In the four studies that commented on donor preparation, sharp neurectomy proximal to the AIN branching point was undertaken. Recipient preparation was commented on in seven of the included studies. Two studies referred to an epineurial window only while five specifically recommended a perineurial window. Coaptation site was specified in four studies and all studies used sutures for coaptation, with four articles stipulating that 9-0 nylon was used. Additionally, fibrin glue was used in conjunction with suture technique in four studies. Consistency in nomenclature used to describe SETS microsurgical technique is needed before case series measuring outcome can be reliably interpreted. This review allowed for the development of suggestions for standardisation of nomenclature and minimal reporting requirements when describing SETS technique. Standardisation of technique will allow for reproducibility and facilitate future evaluations of outcome in prospective randomised control trials.