Cargando…
SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Data of patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Nature Singapore
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-023-01431-z |
_version_ | 1785146623196659712 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Xingmao Fang, Jingquan Huang, Ling Chen, Hang Chen, Han Chai, Tengjiao Ye, Zeyao Chen, Hanguang Xu, Qi Du, Yian Yu, Pengfei |
author_facet | Huang, Xingmao Fang, Jingquan Huang, Ling Chen, Hang Chen, Han Chai, Tengjiao Ye, Zeyao Chen, Hanguang Xu, Qi Du, Yian Yu, Pengfei |
author_sort | Huang, Xingmao |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Data of patients with clinical stage T3–4aN0–3M0 (IIb–III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein–Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-023-01431-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10640399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Nature Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106403992023-11-14 SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis Huang, Xingmao Fang, Jingquan Huang, Ling Chen, Hang Chen, Han Chai, Tengjiao Ye, Zeyao Chen, Hanguang Xu, Qi Du, Yian Yu, Pengfei Gastric Cancer Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of SOX combined with a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor compared with SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer and to explore biomarkers that may predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: Data of patients with clinical stage T3–4aN0–3M0 (IIb–III) gastric cancer were reviewed to create a primary database. Patients treated with perioperative SOX combined with sintilimab were included in Group A, while those treated with SOX alone were included in Group B. After one-to-one propensity score matching, pathological response and short-term survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. In addition, potential efficacy-related biomarkers were analyzed. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2022, a total of 150 patients were included in the analysis, with 75 patients in each group. The rates of pathological complete response (21.3% vs. 4.0%; P = 0.001) and major pathological response (45.3% vs. 22.7%; P = 0.003) in Group A were statistically higher than those in Group B. There was no significant difference in 1-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 92.0%; P = 0.392) and disease-free survival (88.9% vs. 88.0%; P = 0.357) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of Group A showed that the pathological complete response (40.6% vs. 8.6%; P = 0.002) and major pathological response (65.6% vs. 28.6%; P = 0.002) rates were significantly higher in programmed death ligand-1-positive patients with a combined positive score of ≥ 5. A pathological complete response was achieved in 42.9% patients (3/7) with mismatch repair deficiency. For the two patients confirmed as Epstein-Barr virus-positive, one patient achieved a pathological complete response and the other achieved a major pathological response. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of SOX combined with a PD-1 inhibitor may improve the pathological response rate of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, especially those with programmed death ligand-1 combined positive score ≥ 5, Epstein–Barr virus-positivity and mismatch repair deficiency. However, further prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the long-term survival benefit. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10120-023-01431-z. Springer Nature Singapore 2023-09-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10640399/ /pubmed/37768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-023-01431-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Huang, Xingmao Fang, Jingquan Huang, Ling Chen, Hang Chen, Han Chai, Tengjiao Ye, Zeyao Chen, Hanguang Xu, Qi Du, Yian Yu, Pengfei SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title | SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title_full | SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title_fullStr | SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title_short | SOX combined with sintilimab versus SOX alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
title_sort | sox combined with sintilimab versus sox alone in the perioperative management of locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37768447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-023-01431-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangxingmao soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT fangjingquan soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT huangling soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT chenhang soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT chenhan soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT chaitengjiao soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT yezeyao soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT chenhanguang soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT xuqi soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT duyian soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis AT yupengfei soxcombinedwithsintilimabversussoxaloneintheperioperativemanagementoflocallyadvancedgastriccancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis |