Cargando…
Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails
BACKGROUND: Endobronchial forceps are commonly used for complex IVC filter removal and after initial attempts at IVC filter retrieval with a snare have failed. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help distinguish cases where primary removal should be attempted with standard snare technique o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37950835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00392-9 |
_version_ | 1785133780520927232 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Richard D. Schuchardt, Philip Charles, Jonathan Kumar, Premsai Drews, Elena Kazi, Stephanie DePalma, Andres Fang, Adam Raymond, Aislynn Davis, Cliff Massis, Kamal Hoots, Glenn Mhaskar, Rahul Nezami, Nariman Shaikh, Jamil |
author_facet | Kang, Richard D. Schuchardt, Philip Charles, Jonathan Kumar, Premsai Drews, Elena Kazi, Stephanie DePalma, Andres Fang, Adam Raymond, Aislynn Davis, Cliff Massis, Kamal Hoots, Glenn Mhaskar, Rahul Nezami, Nariman Shaikh, Jamil |
author_sort | Kang, Richard D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Endobronchial forceps are commonly used for complex IVC filter removal and after initial attempts at IVC filter retrieval with a snare have failed. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help distinguish cases where primary removal should be attempted with standard snare technique or whether attempts at removal should directly be started with forceps. This study is aimed to identify clinical and imaging predictors of snare failure which necessitate conversion to endobronchial forceps. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 543 patients who underwent IVC filter retrievals were performed at three large quaternary care centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2022. Patient demographics and IVC filter characteristics on cross-sectional images (degree of tilt, hook embedment, and strut penetration, etc.) were reviewed. Binary multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IVC filter retrieval where snare retrieval would fail. RESULTS: Thirty seven percent of the patients (n = 203) necessitated utilization of endobronchial forceps. IVC filter hook embedment (OR:4.55; 95%CI: 1.74–11.87; p = 0.002) and strut penetration (OR: 56.46; 95% CI 20.2–157.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of snare failure. In contrast, total dwell time, BMI, and degree of filter tilt were not associated with snare failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps was significantly associated with increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure times (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVC filter hook embedment and strut penetration were predictors of snare retrieval failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure time. When either hook embedment or strut penetration is present on pre-procedural cross-sectional images, IVC filter retrieval should be initiated using endobronchial forceps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, large multicenter retrospective cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10640549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106405492023-11-11 Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails Kang, Richard D. Schuchardt, Philip Charles, Jonathan Kumar, Premsai Drews, Elena Kazi, Stephanie DePalma, Andres Fang, Adam Raymond, Aislynn Davis, Cliff Massis, Kamal Hoots, Glenn Mhaskar, Rahul Nezami, Nariman Shaikh, Jamil CVIR Endovasc Original Article BACKGROUND: Endobronchial forceps are commonly used for complex IVC filter removal and after initial attempts at IVC filter retrieval with a snare have failed. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help distinguish cases where primary removal should be attempted with standard snare technique or whether attempts at removal should directly be started with forceps. This study is aimed to identify clinical and imaging predictors of snare failure which necessitate conversion to endobronchial forceps. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 543 patients who underwent IVC filter retrievals were performed at three large quaternary care centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2022. Patient demographics and IVC filter characteristics on cross-sectional images (degree of tilt, hook embedment, and strut penetration, etc.) were reviewed. Binary multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of IVC filter retrieval where snare retrieval would fail. RESULTS: Thirty seven percent of the patients (n = 203) necessitated utilization of endobronchial forceps. IVC filter hook embedment (OR:4.55; 95%CI: 1.74–11.87; p = 0.002) and strut penetration (OR: 56.46; 95% CI 20.2–157.7; p = 0.001) were predictors of snare failure. In contrast, total dwell time, BMI, and degree of filter tilt were not associated with snare failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps was significantly associated with increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure times (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IVC filter hook embedment and strut penetration were predictors of snare retrieval failure. Intraprocedural conversion from snare to endobronchial forceps increased contrast volume, radiation dose, and total procedure time. When either hook embedment or strut penetration is present on pre-procedural cross-sectional images, IVC filter retrieval should be initiated using endobronchial forceps. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, large multicenter retrospective cohort. Springer International Publishing 2023-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10640549/ /pubmed/37950835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00392-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kang, Richard D. Schuchardt, Philip Charles, Jonathan Kumar, Premsai Drews, Elena Kazi, Stephanie DePalma, Andres Fang, Adam Raymond, Aislynn Davis, Cliff Massis, Kamal Hoots, Glenn Mhaskar, Rahul Nezami, Nariman Shaikh, Jamil Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title | Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title_full | Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title_fullStr | Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title_short | Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
title_sort | predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37950835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42155-023-00392-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangrichardd predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT schuchardtphilip predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT charlesjonathan predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT kumarpremsai predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT drewselena predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT kazistephanie predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT depalmaandres predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT fangadam predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT raymondaislynn predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT daviscliff predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT massiskamal predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT hootsglenn predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT mhaskarrahul predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT nezaminariman predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails AT shaikhjamil predictorsofendobronchialforcepsutilizationforinferiorvenacavafilterretrievalwhensnareretrievalfails |