Cargando…

Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review

AIM: This review aims to assess complication rates, soft tissue gain, and bone gain associated with the use of self-inflating osmotic hydrogel tissue expanders (SOHTEs) for soft tissue expansion (STE). METHODS: A comprehensive search on Pubmed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellesøe, Adam Gade, Shado, Rawand, Pereira, Ines Novo, Madruga, David, Hassan, Haidar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00175-3
_version_ 1785133785590792192
author Ellesøe, Adam Gade
Shado, Rawand
Pereira, Ines Novo
Madruga, David
Hassan, Haidar
author_facet Ellesøe, Adam Gade
Shado, Rawand
Pereira, Ines Novo
Madruga, David
Hassan, Haidar
author_sort Ellesøe, Adam Gade
collection PubMed
description AIM: This review aims to assess complication rates, soft tissue gain, and bone gain associated with the use of self-inflating osmotic hydrogel tissue expanders (SOHTEs) for soft tissue expansion (STE). METHODS: A comprehensive search on Pubmed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify human studies using SOHTEs for STE; last searched in March 2023. Expansion phase details and expander variables were documented. Complication rates, soft tissue gain, and bone gain reported in each study were also recorded. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies ranging from evidence levels II–IV (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence), without specific date limits. For assessing bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a Risk of Bias tool was employed. The synthesised results were presented through tables, sunburst plots, and bar charts. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were identified, comprising 4 RCTs, 1 cohort study, and 8 case-series. Employment of SOHTEs yielded an overall complication rate of 17% (24/140 sites), with expander perforation accounting for 9.3% (13/140) of the sites. Specific complication rates included dehiscence (1.4%, 2/140 sites), paraesthesia (1.4%, 2/140 sites), and infection (1.4%, 2/140 sites). All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were categorised at Level II. The remaining investigations primarily consisted of Level IV case-series lacking controls. All studies demonstrated some concerns towards bias. CONCLUSION: STE studies using SOHTEs exhibit a reduction in complications associated with bone augmentation in scenarios of inadequate soft tissue coverage. Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits even in cases with sufficient soft tissue. Adherence to procedural precautions may reduce the risk of expander perforations, further diminishing complications. Subsequent studies should incorporate individual patient and expander variables in their reports to explore the impact of expansion phases on complication rates, as well as bone and soft tissue augmentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10640575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106405752023-11-11 Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review Ellesøe, Adam Gade Shado, Rawand Pereira, Ines Novo Madruga, David Hassan, Haidar BDJ Open Review Article AIM: This review aims to assess complication rates, soft tissue gain, and bone gain associated with the use of self-inflating osmotic hydrogel tissue expanders (SOHTEs) for soft tissue expansion (STE). METHODS: A comprehensive search on Pubmed and Google Scholar databases was conducted to identify human studies using SOHTEs for STE; last searched in March 2023. Expansion phase details and expander variables were documented. Complication rates, soft tissue gain, and bone gain reported in each study were also recorded. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies ranging from evidence levels II–IV (Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence), without specific date limits. For assessing bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a Risk of Bias tool was employed. The synthesised results were presented through tables, sunburst plots, and bar charts. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were identified, comprising 4 RCTs, 1 cohort study, and 8 case-series. Employment of SOHTEs yielded an overall complication rate of 17% (24/140 sites), with expander perforation accounting for 9.3% (13/140) of the sites. Specific complication rates included dehiscence (1.4%, 2/140 sites), paraesthesia (1.4%, 2/140 sites), and infection (1.4%, 2/140 sites). All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were categorised at Level II. The remaining investigations primarily consisted of Level IV case-series lacking controls. All studies demonstrated some concerns towards bias. CONCLUSION: STE studies using SOHTEs exhibit a reduction in complications associated with bone augmentation in scenarios of inadequate soft tissue coverage. Preliminary evidence suggests potential benefits even in cases with sufficient soft tissue. Adherence to procedural precautions may reduce the risk of expander perforations, further diminishing complications. Subsequent studies should incorporate individual patient and expander variables in their reports to explore the impact of expansion phases on complication rates, as well as bone and soft tissue augmentation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10640575/ /pubmed/37952027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00175-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Ellesøe, Adam Gade
Shado, Rawand
Pereira, Ines Novo
Madruga, David
Hassan, Haidar
Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title_full Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title_fullStr Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title_full_unstemmed Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title_short Soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. Evidence-based review
title_sort soft tissue expansion using self-inflating osmotic hydrogel expanders prior to bone augmentation: healing and complications. evidence-based review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37952027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-023-00175-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ellesøeadamgade softtissueexpansionusingselfinflatingosmotichydrogelexpanderspriortoboneaugmentationhealingandcomplicationsevidencebasedreview
AT shadorawand softtissueexpansionusingselfinflatingosmotichydrogelexpanderspriortoboneaugmentationhealingandcomplicationsevidencebasedreview
AT pereirainesnovo softtissueexpansionusingselfinflatingosmotichydrogelexpanderspriortoboneaugmentationhealingandcomplicationsevidencebasedreview
AT madrugadavid softtissueexpansionusingselfinflatingosmotichydrogelexpanderspriortoboneaugmentationhealingandcomplicationsevidencebasedreview
AT hassanhaidar softtissueexpansionusingselfinflatingosmotichydrogelexpanderspriortoboneaugmentationhealingandcomplicationsevidencebasedreview