Cargando…
Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most widely performed bariatric surgery and has been associated with excellent outcomes and a significant reduction in obesity-related morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, this surgery is performed using five to seven trocars. However, LSG performed th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022298 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46956 |
_version_ | 1785133813593014272 |
---|---|
author | Ataya, Karim Bsat, Ayman M Aljaafreh, Almoutuz Al Ayoubi, Amir Rabih Al Tannir, Abdul Hafiz |
author_facet | Ataya, Karim Bsat, Ayman M Aljaafreh, Almoutuz Al Ayoubi, Amir Rabih Al Tannir, Abdul Hafiz |
author_sort | Ataya, Karim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most widely performed bariatric surgery and has been associated with excellent outcomes and a significant reduction in obesity-related morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, this surgery is performed using five to seven trocars. However, LSG performed through a single trocar is emerging as a less invasive method of performing this surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the outcomes and complication rates of single-port versus multi-port LSG. We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from 2008 to 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data on variables such as operative time, excess weight loss, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative leak, and incisional hernia rates were collected and analyzed using a random-effects model. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found between the single-port LSG (SILSG) and conventional LSG (CLSG) groups in terms of operative time, rate, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and excess weight loss (EWL). Furthermore, single incision sleeve gastrectomy showed better satisfaction with the cosmetic score. SILSG is a viable alternative procedure, showing comparable outcomes to multiport conventional sleeve gastrectomy, in addition, to a better cosmetic satisfaction score. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10640720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106407202023-10-13 Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Ataya, Karim Bsat, Ayman M Aljaafreh, Almoutuz Al Ayoubi, Amir Rabih Al Tannir, Abdul Hafiz Cureus Gastroenterology Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most widely performed bariatric surgery and has been associated with excellent outcomes and a significant reduction in obesity-related morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, this surgery is performed using five to seven trocars. However, LSG performed through a single trocar is emerging as a less invasive method of performing this surgery. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the outcomes and complication rates of single-port versus multi-port LSG. We searched PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for articles published from 2008 to 2023, in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data on variables such as operative time, excess weight loss, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative leak, and incisional hernia rates were collected and analyzed using a random-effects model. Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found between the single-port LSG (SILSG) and conventional LSG (CLSG) groups in terms of operative time, rate, intraoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and excess weight loss (EWL). Furthermore, single incision sleeve gastrectomy showed better satisfaction with the cosmetic score. SILSG is a viable alternative procedure, showing comparable outcomes to multiport conventional sleeve gastrectomy, in addition, to a better cosmetic satisfaction score. Cureus 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10640720/ /pubmed/38022298 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46956 Text en Copyright © 2023, Ataya et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology Ataya, Karim Bsat, Ayman M Aljaafreh, Almoutuz Al Ayoubi, Amir Rabih Al Tannir, Abdul Hafiz Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title | Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full | Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_short | Single Incision Versus Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review |
title_sort | single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: meta-analysis and systematic review |
topic | Gastroenterology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10640720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022298 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46956 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atayakarim singleincisionversusconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomymetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT bsataymanm singleincisionversusconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomymetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT aljaafrehalmoutuz singleincisionversusconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomymetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT alayoubiamirrabih singleincisionversusconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomymetaanalysisandsystematicreview AT altannirabdulhafiz singleincisionversusconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsleevegastrectomymetaanalysisandsystematicreview |