Cargando…

A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke

BACKGROUND: Treatment for stroke is time-dependent, and ambulance services play a vital role in the early recognition, assessment and transportation of stroke patients. Innovations which begin in ambulance services to expedite delivery of treatments for stroke are developing. However, research deliv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dixon, Mark, Appleton, Jason P., Siriwardena, A. Niroshan, Williams, Julia, Bath, Philip M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06910-w
_version_ 1785146693463834624
author Dixon, Mark
Appleton, Jason P.
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
Williams, Julia
Bath, Philip M.
author_facet Dixon, Mark
Appleton, Jason P.
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
Williams, Julia
Bath, Philip M.
author_sort Dixon, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment for stroke is time-dependent, and ambulance services play a vital role in the early recognition, assessment and transportation of stroke patients. Innovations which begin in ambulance services to expedite delivery of treatments for stroke are developing. However, research delivery in ambulance services is novel, developing and not fully understood. AIMS: To synthesise literature encompassing ambulance service-based randomised controlled interventions for acute stroke with consideration to the characteristics of the type of intervention, consent modality, time intervals and issues unique to research delivery in ambulance services. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Online searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and WHO IRCTP databases and hand searches identified 15 eligible studies from 538. Articles were heterogeneous in nature and meta-analysis was partially available as 13 studies reported key time intervals, but terminology varied. Randomised interventions were evident across all points of contact with ambulance services: identification of stroke during the call for help, higher dispatch priority assigned to stroke, on-scene assessment and clinical interventions, direct referral to comprehensive stroke centres and definitive care delivery at scene. Consent methods ranged between informed patient, waiver and proxy modalities with country-specific variation. Challenges unique to the prehospital setting comprise the geographical distribution of ambulance resources, low recruitment rates, prolonged recruitment phases, management of investigational medicinal product and incomplete datasets. CONCLUSION: Research opportunities exist across all points of contact between stroke patients and ambulance services, but randomisation and consent remain novel. Early collaboration and engagement between trialists and ambulance services will alleviate some of the complexities reported. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2018CRD42018075803 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-023-06910-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641071
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106410712023-11-14 A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke Dixon, Mark Appleton, Jason P. Siriwardena, A. Niroshan Williams, Julia Bath, Philip M. Neurol Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Treatment for stroke is time-dependent, and ambulance services play a vital role in the early recognition, assessment and transportation of stroke patients. Innovations which begin in ambulance services to expedite delivery of treatments for stroke are developing. However, research delivery in ambulance services is novel, developing and not fully understood. AIMS: To synthesise literature encompassing ambulance service-based randomised controlled interventions for acute stroke with consideration to the characteristics of the type of intervention, consent modality, time intervals and issues unique to research delivery in ambulance services. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Online searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and WHO IRCTP databases and hand searches identified 15 eligible studies from 538. Articles were heterogeneous in nature and meta-analysis was partially available as 13 studies reported key time intervals, but terminology varied. Randomised interventions were evident across all points of contact with ambulance services: identification of stroke during the call for help, higher dispatch priority assigned to stroke, on-scene assessment and clinical interventions, direct referral to comprehensive stroke centres and definitive care delivery at scene. Consent methods ranged between informed patient, waiver and proxy modalities with country-specific variation. Challenges unique to the prehospital setting comprise the geographical distribution of ambulance resources, low recruitment rates, prolonged recruitment phases, management of investigational medicinal product and incomplete datasets. CONCLUSION: Research opportunities exist across all points of contact between stroke patients and ambulance services, but randomisation and consent remain novel. Early collaboration and engagement between trialists and ambulance services will alleviate some of the complexities reported. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 2018CRD42018075803 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-023-06910-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-07-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10641071/ /pubmed/37405524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06910-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Dixon, Mark
Appleton, Jason P.
Siriwardena, A. Niroshan
Williams, Julia
Bath, Philip M.
A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title_full A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title_fullStr A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title_short A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
title_sort systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641071/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37405524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06910-w
work_keys_str_mv AT dixonmark asystematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT appletonjasonp asystematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT siriwardenaaniroshan asystematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT williamsjulia asystematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT bathphilipm asystematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT dixonmark systematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT appletonjasonp systematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT siriwardenaaniroshan systematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT williamsjulia systematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke
AT bathphilipm systematicreviewofambulanceservicebasedrandomisedcontrolledtrialsinstroke