Cargando…

Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support

INTRODUCTION: Failure to restore spontaneous circulation remains a major cause of death for cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has emerged as a feasible and efficacious rescue strategy for selected refractor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Cindy H., Trummer, George, Belohlavek, Jan, Yannopoulos, Demetris, Bartos, Jason A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100493
_version_ 1785146814012325888
author Hsu, Cindy H.
Trummer, George
Belohlavek, Jan
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Bartos, Jason A.
author_facet Hsu, Cindy H.
Trummer, George
Belohlavek, Jan
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Bartos, Jason A.
author_sort Hsu, Cindy H.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Failure to restore spontaneous circulation remains a major cause of death for cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has emerged as a feasible and efficacious rescue strategy for selected refractory CA patients. METHODS: Mechanical Circulatory Support was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14–17, 2023 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of CA resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category. RESULTS: Top 5 knowledge gaps included optimal patient selection, pre-ECPR treatments, logistical and programmatic characteristics of ECPR programs, generalizability and effectiveness of ECPR, and prevention of reperfusion injury. Top 5 barriers to translation included cost/resource limitations, technical challenges, collaboration across multiple disciplines, limited patient population, and early identification of eligible patients. Top 5 research priorities focused on comparing the outcomes of prehospital/rapid transport strategies vs in-hospital ECPR initiation, implementation of high-performing ECPR system vs standard care, rapid patient identification tools vs standard clinical judgment, post-cardiac arrest bundled care vs no bundled care, and standardized ECPR clinical protocol vs routine care. CONCLUSION: This overview can serve as an innovative guide to transform the care and outcome of patients with refractory CA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106417022023-11-14 Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support Hsu, Cindy H. Trummer, George Belohlavek, Jan Yannopoulos, Demetris Bartos, Jason A. Resusc Plus Review INTRODUCTION: Failure to restore spontaneous circulation remains a major cause of death for cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Mechanical circulatory support, specifically extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), has emerged as a feasible and efficacious rescue strategy for selected refractory CA patients. METHODS: Mechanical Circulatory Support was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14–17, 2023 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of CA resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category. RESULTS: Top 5 knowledge gaps included optimal patient selection, pre-ECPR treatments, logistical and programmatic characteristics of ECPR programs, generalizability and effectiveness of ECPR, and prevention of reperfusion injury. Top 5 barriers to translation included cost/resource limitations, technical challenges, collaboration across multiple disciplines, limited patient population, and early identification of eligible patients. Top 5 research priorities focused on comparing the outcomes of prehospital/rapid transport strategies vs in-hospital ECPR initiation, implementation of high-performing ECPR system vs standard care, rapid patient identification tools vs standard clinical judgment, post-cardiac arrest bundled care vs no bundled care, and standardized ECPR clinical protocol vs routine care. CONCLUSION: This overview can serve as an innovative guide to transform the care and outcome of patients with refractory CA. Elsevier 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10641702/ /pubmed/37965244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100493 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Hsu, Cindy H.
Trummer, George
Belohlavek, Jan
Yannopoulos, Demetris
Bartos, Jason A.
Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title_full Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title_fullStr Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title_full_unstemmed Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title_short Wolf Creek XVII Part 7: Mechanical circulatory support
title_sort wolf creek xvii part 7: mechanical circulatory support
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100493
work_keys_str_mv AT hsucindyh wolfcreekxviipart7mechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT trummergeorge wolfcreekxviipart7mechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT belohlavekjan wolfcreekxviipart7mechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT yannopoulosdemetris wolfcreekxviipart7mechanicalcirculatorysupport
AT bartosjasona wolfcreekxviipart7mechanicalcirculatorysupport