Cargando…

Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: “Do it yourself” (DIY) food-based fortification involves adding fortificants into everyday foods. It is a flexible solution that allows older people with reduced appetite to meet their nutritional needs. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the systematic review are (a) to describe DIY fortified reci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Geny, Alexia, Petitjean, Maité, Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie, Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1232502
_version_ 1785146818692120576
author Geny, Alexia
Petitjean, Maité
Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
author_facet Geny, Alexia
Petitjean, Maité
Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
author_sort Geny, Alexia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: “Do it yourself” (DIY) food-based fortification involves adding fortificants into everyday foods. It is a flexible solution that allows older people with reduced appetite to meet their nutritional needs. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the systematic review are (a) to describe DIY fortified recipes, (b) to evaluate their acceptability, and (c) to evaluate whether they are effective levers to improve nutritional outcomes in older people. METHODS: A systematic search of 3 databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, last searched on January 2022) was undertaken. Main eligibility criteria include older adults aged ≥60 years living at home, in an institution or in hospital. Studies carried out for a specific medical condition or targeting only micronutrient fortification were excluded. After reviewing all titles/abstracts then full-text papers, key data were extracted and synthesized narratively. The quality of included studies was assessed using Kmet et al. RESULTS: Of 21,493 papers extracted, 44 original studies were included (3,384 participants), with 31 reporting nutritional outcomes, 3 reporting acceptability outcomes and 10 reporting both nutritional and acceptability outcomes. The review highlighted a wide variety of DIY fortified recipes, with additional energy ranging from 23 to 850 kcal/d (M = 403; SE = 62) and/or protein ranging from 4 to 40 g/d (M = 19; SE = 2). Compared to a standard diet, DIY fortification seems to be a valuable strategy for increasing energy and protein intake in older people. However, no strong evidence was observed on the nutritional status. IMPLICATION FOR FUTURE: Further acceptability studies are crucial to ensure that DIY fortified foods are palatable and thus have a significant impact on the nutritional status. In addition, it would be useful for studies to better describe DIY recipes. This information would result in a better understanding of the factors that maximize the impact of DIY fortification on nutritional outcomes. Study registration: PROSPERO no. CRD42021244689. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021244689.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106417312023-11-14 Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review Geny, Alexia Petitjean, Maité Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie Sulmont-Rossé, Claire Front Nutr Nutrition BACKGROUND: “Do it yourself” (DIY) food-based fortification involves adding fortificants into everyday foods. It is a flexible solution that allows older people with reduced appetite to meet their nutritional needs. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the systematic review are (a) to describe DIY fortified recipes, (b) to evaluate their acceptability, and (c) to evaluate whether they are effective levers to improve nutritional outcomes in older people. METHODS: A systematic search of 3 databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, last searched on January 2022) was undertaken. Main eligibility criteria include older adults aged ≥60 years living at home, in an institution or in hospital. Studies carried out for a specific medical condition or targeting only micronutrient fortification were excluded. After reviewing all titles/abstracts then full-text papers, key data were extracted and synthesized narratively. The quality of included studies was assessed using Kmet et al. RESULTS: Of 21,493 papers extracted, 44 original studies were included (3,384 participants), with 31 reporting nutritional outcomes, 3 reporting acceptability outcomes and 10 reporting both nutritional and acceptability outcomes. The review highlighted a wide variety of DIY fortified recipes, with additional energy ranging from 23 to 850 kcal/d (M = 403; SE = 62) and/or protein ranging from 4 to 40 g/d (M = 19; SE = 2). Compared to a standard diet, DIY fortification seems to be a valuable strategy for increasing energy and protein intake in older people. However, no strong evidence was observed on the nutritional status. IMPLICATION FOR FUTURE: Further acceptability studies are crucial to ensure that DIY fortified foods are palatable and thus have a significant impact on the nutritional status. In addition, it would be useful for studies to better describe DIY recipes. This information would result in a better understanding of the factors that maximize the impact of DIY fortification on nutritional outcomes. Study registration: PROSPERO no. CRD42021244689. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021244689. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10641731/ /pubmed/37964932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1232502 Text en Copyright © 2023 Geny, Petitjean, Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy and Sulmont-Rossé. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Geny, Alexia
Petitjean, Maité
Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Virginie
Sulmont-Rossé, Claire
Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title_full Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title_fullStr Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title_short Impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
title_sort impact of food-based fortification on nutritional outcomes and acceptability in older adults: systematic literature review
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1232502
work_keys_str_mv AT genyalexia impactoffoodbasedfortificationonnutritionaloutcomesandacceptabilityinolderadultssystematicliteraturereview
AT petitjeanmaite impactoffoodbasedfortificationonnutritionaloutcomesandacceptabilityinolderadultssystematicliteraturereview
AT vanwymelbekedelannoyvirginie impactoffoodbasedfortificationonnutritionaloutcomesandacceptabilityinolderadultssystematicliteraturereview
AT sulmontrosseclaire impactoffoodbasedfortificationonnutritionaloutcomesandacceptabilityinolderadultssystematicliteraturereview