Cargando…
Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers
BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight mar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11607-6 |
_version_ | 1785146860853264384 |
---|---|
author | Chung, Yousun Nam, Soo Kyung Chang, Ho Eun Lee, Cheol Kang, Gyeong Hoon Lee, Hye Seung Park, Kyoung Un |
author_facet | Chung, Yousun Nam, Soo Kyung Chang, Ho Eun Lee, Cheol Kang, Gyeong Hoon Lee, Hye Seung Park, Kyoung Un |
author_sort | Chung, Yousun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers for detection of MSI. METHODS: The eight marker-panel was comprised of five conventional markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27) and three LMR markers (BAT-52, BAT-59 and BAT-62). MSI testing was performed against 300 specimens of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers through PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis length analysis. RESULTS: The MSI testing with eight marker-panel showed 99.3% (295/297) concordance with IHC analysis excluding 3 MMR-focal deficient cases. The sensitivity of BAT-59 and BAT-62 was higher than or comparable to that of conventional markers in gastric and endometrial cancer. The mean shift size was larger in LMR markers compared to conventional markers for gastric and endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The MSI testing with eight maker-panel showed comparable performance with IHC analysis. The LMR markers, especially BAT-59 and BAT-62, showed high sensitivity and large shifts which can contribute to increased confidence in MSI classification, especially in gastric and endometrial cancers. Further study is needed with large number of samples for the validation of these LMR markers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11607-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10641958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106419582023-11-14 Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers Chung, Yousun Nam, Soo Kyung Chang, Ho Eun Lee, Cheol Kang, Gyeong Hoon Lee, Hye Seung Park, Kyoung Un BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of microsatellite instability (MSI) status is critical for optimal treatment in cancer patients. Conventional MSI markers can sometimes display subtle shifts that are difficult to interpret, especially in non-colorectal cases. We evaluated an experimental eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat (LMR) markers for detection of MSI. METHODS: The eight marker-panel was comprised of five conventional markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, NR-21, NR-24, and NR-27) and three LMR markers (BAT-52, BAT-59 and BAT-62). MSI testing was performed against 300 specimens of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers through PCR followed by capillary electrophoresis length analysis. RESULTS: The MSI testing with eight marker-panel showed 99.3% (295/297) concordance with IHC analysis excluding 3 MMR-focal deficient cases. The sensitivity of BAT-59 and BAT-62 was higher than or comparable to that of conventional markers in gastric and endometrial cancer. The mean shift size was larger in LMR markers compared to conventional markers for gastric and endometrial cancers. CONCLUSIONS: The MSI testing with eight maker-panel showed comparable performance with IHC analysis. The LMR markers, especially BAT-59 and BAT-62, showed high sensitivity and large shifts which can contribute to increased confidence in MSI classification, especially in gastric and endometrial cancers. Further study is needed with large number of samples for the validation of these LMR markers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-11607-6. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641958/ /pubmed/37953261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11607-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chung, Yousun Nam, Soo Kyung Chang, Ho Eun Lee, Cheol Kang, Gyeong Hoon Lee, Hye Seung Park, Kyoung Un Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title | Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title_full | Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title_short | Evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
title_sort | evaluation of an eight marker-panel including long mononucleotide repeat markers to detect microsatellite instability in colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11607-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chungyousun evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT namsookyung evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT changhoeun evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT leecheol evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT kanggyeonghoon evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT leehyeseung evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers AT parkkyoungun evaluationofaneightmarkerpanelincludinglongmononucleotiderepeatmarkerstodetectmicrosatelliteinstabilityincolorectalgastricandendometrialcancers |