Cargando…

Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Despite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yinan, Li, Jieni, Li, Mai, Aparasu, Rajender R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1
_version_ 1785146863971729408
author Huang, Yinan
Li, Jieni
Li, Mai
Aparasu, Rajender R.
author_facet Huang, Yinan
Li, Jieni
Li, Mai
Aparasu, Rajender R.
author_sort Huang, Yinan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare. METHODS: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6–0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%). CONCLUSIONS: The ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106419712023-11-14 Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review Huang, Yinan Li, Jieni Li, Mai Aparasu, Rajender R. BMC Med Res Methodol Research BACKGROUND: Despite the interest in machine learning (ML) algorithms for analyzing real-world data (RWD) in healthcare, the use of ML in predicting time-to-event data, a common scenario in clinical practice, is less explored. ML models are capable of algorithmically learning from large, complex datasets and can offer advantages in predicting time-to-event data. We reviewed the recent applications of ML for survival analysis using RWD in healthcare. METHODS: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched from database inception through March 2023 to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies of ML models for predicting time-to-event outcomes using the RWD. Two reviewers extracted information on the data source, patient population, survival outcome, ML algorithms, and the Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 257 citations, 28 publications were included. Random survival forests (N = 16, 57%) and neural networks (N = 11, 39%) were the most popular ML algorithms. There was variability across AUC for these ML models (median 0.789, range 0.6–0.950). ML algorithms were predominately considered for predicting overall survival in oncology (N = 12, 43%). ML survival models were often used to predict disease prognosis or clinical events (N = 27, 96%) in the oncology, while less were used for treatment outcomes (N = 1, 4%). CONCLUSIONS: The ML algorithms, random survival forests and neural networks, are mainly used for RWD to predict survival outcomes such as disease prognosis or clinical events in the oncology. This review shows that more opportunities remain to apply these ML algorithms to inform treatment decision-making in clinical practice. More methodological work is also needed to ensure the utility and applicability of ML models in survival outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641971/ /pubmed/37957593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Yinan
Li, Jieni
Li, Mai
Aparasu, Rajender R.
Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title_full Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title_fullStr Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title_short Application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
title_sort application of machine learning in predicting survival outcomes involving real-world data: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-023-02078-1
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyinan applicationofmachinelearninginpredictingsurvivaloutcomesinvolvingrealworlddataascopingreview
AT lijieni applicationofmachinelearninginpredictingsurvivaloutcomesinvolvingrealworlddataascopingreview
AT limai applicationofmachinelearninginpredictingsurvivaloutcomesinvolvingrealworlddataascopingreview
AT aparasurajenderr applicationofmachinelearninginpredictingsurvivaloutcomesinvolvingrealworlddataascopingreview