Cargando…
Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z |
_version_ | 1785146865858117632 |
---|---|
author | Dason, E. Shirin Drost, Leah Greenblatt, Ellen M. Scheer, Adena Han, Jinglan Doshi, Tanya Jones, Claire A. |
author_facet | Dason, E. Shirin Drost, Leah Greenblatt, Ellen M. Scheer, Adena Han, Jinglan Doshi, Tanya Jones, Claire A. |
author_sort | Dason, E. Shirin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10641979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106419792023-11-14 Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment Dason, E. Shirin Drost, Leah Greenblatt, Ellen M. Scheer, Adena Han, Jinglan Doshi, Tanya Jones, Claire A. BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641979/ /pubmed/37953253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Dason, E. Shirin Drost, Leah Greenblatt, Ellen M. Scheer, Adena Han, Jinglan Doshi, Tanya Jones, Claire A. Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title | Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title_full | Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title_fullStr | Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title_short | Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
title_sort | patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasoneshirin patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT drostleah patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT greenblattellenm patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT scheeradena patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT hanjinglan patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT doshitanya patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment AT jonesclairea patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment |