Cargando…

Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment

BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dason, E. Shirin, Drost, Leah, Greenblatt, Ellen M., Scheer, Adena, Han, Jinglan, Doshi, Tanya, Jones, Claire A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z
_version_ 1785146865858117632
author Dason, E. Shirin
Drost, Leah
Greenblatt, Ellen M.
Scheer, Adena
Han, Jinglan
Doshi, Tanya
Jones, Claire A.
author_facet Dason, E. Shirin
Drost, Leah
Greenblatt, Ellen M.
Scheer, Adena
Han, Jinglan
Doshi, Tanya
Jones, Claire A.
author_sort Dason, E. Shirin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10641979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106419792023-11-14 Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment Dason, E. Shirin Drost, Leah Greenblatt, Ellen M. Scheer, Adena Han, Jinglan Doshi, Tanya Jones, Claire A. BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that patients have difficulty with the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing (EF). This study aimed to investigate the decisional difficulties and possible decisional support mechanisms for patients considering EF, and for their providers. METHODS: This qualitative study involved a needs assessment via individual interviews. Participants included patients considering EF at one academic fertility clinic and providers from across Canada who counsel patients considering EF. 25 participants were included (13 providers and 12 patients). The interview guide was developed according to the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Interviews were transcribed, and transcripts analyzed for themes and concepts using NVIVO 12. FINDINGS: Multiple factors contributing to decisional difficulty were identified, including: (1) multiple reproductive options available with differing views from patients/providers regarding their importance; (2) a decision typically made under the pressure of reproductive aging; (3) uncertainty surrounding the technology/inadequate outcome data; (4) the financial burden of EF; (5) inherent uncertainty relating to potential decision regret; and (6) differing perceptions between patients/providers regarding the role providers should play in the decision. Additionally, potential sources of decisional support were identified, including provision of basic information before and/or during initial consultation, followed by an opportunity during or after initial consultation for clarifying information and helping with value judgements. Individualized counselling based on patient values, adequate follow-up, psychosocial counselling, and peer support were also emphasized. CONCLUSIONS: More decisional support for women considering EF is needed. Suggestions include a patient decision aid in conjunction with modified healthcare provider counselling, support and follow up. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z. BioMed Central 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10641979/ /pubmed/37953253 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dason, E. Shirin
Drost, Leah
Greenblatt, Ellen M.
Scheer, Adena
Han, Jinglan
Doshi, Tanya
Jones, Claire A.
Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title_full Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title_fullStr Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title_short Patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
title_sort patients’ and providers’ perspectives on the decision to undergo non-urgent egg freezing: a needs assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953253
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02743-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dasoneshirin patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT drostleah patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT greenblattellenm patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT scheeradena patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT hanjinglan patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT doshitanya patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment
AT jonesclairea patientsandprovidersperspectivesonthedecisiontoundergononurgenteggfreezinganeedsassessment