Cargando…
Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study
BACKGROUND: Clarifying the effectiveness of co-teaching in medicine and nursing (CMN) is important as it is crucial in clinical practice to improve the quality of patient care and prognosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of CMN in nurse anesthetist training. METHOD: The study com...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8 |
_version_ | 1785146870032498688 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Xiaobei Duan, Yi Ma, Yanli Gao, Zhifeng Zhang, Huan |
author_facet | Ma, Xiaobei Duan, Yi Ma, Yanli Gao, Zhifeng Zhang, Huan |
author_sort | Ma, Xiaobei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clarifying the effectiveness of co-teaching in medicine and nursing (CMN) is important as it is crucial in clinical practice to improve the quality of patient care and prognosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of CMN in nurse anesthetist training. METHOD: The study comprised a 6-month training session and a before-and-after controlled study. In total, 59 nurses were recruited. The first 30 nurses were enrolled in the conventional single-teaching in nursing (SN) group and only took nursing-related courses. The next 29 students were enrolled in the CMN group and received both general medical and nursing-specific curricula. Before and after training, medical and nursing collaboration competency scores and knowledge scores were compared between the two groups. At the end of the study, qualitative comments on teaching satisfaction and clinical reasoning skills improvement were queried, and content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Participants in the CMN group outperformed those in the SN group in tests of medical and nursing collaboration abilities as well as knowledge. The CMN group outperformed the SN group in terms of teaching satisfaction evaluation, particularly in terms of fostering learning in the anesthetist specialty, improving clinical practice, fostering motivation, and influencing how people think about challenges at work. Furthermore, participants in the CMN group felt that their clinical reasoning abilities had improved. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the SN group, the CMN group had enhanced outcomes of patient care, medical and nursing collaboration, and clinical reasoning skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10641995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106419952023-11-14 Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study Ma, Xiaobei Duan, Yi Ma, Yanli Gao, Zhifeng Zhang, Huan BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Clarifying the effectiveness of co-teaching in medicine and nursing (CMN) is important as it is crucial in clinical practice to improve the quality of patient care and prognosis. In this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of CMN in nurse anesthetist training. METHOD: The study comprised a 6-month training session and a before-and-after controlled study. In total, 59 nurses were recruited. The first 30 nurses were enrolled in the conventional single-teaching in nursing (SN) group and only took nursing-related courses. The next 29 students were enrolled in the CMN group and received both general medical and nursing-specific curricula. Before and after training, medical and nursing collaboration competency scores and knowledge scores were compared between the two groups. At the end of the study, qualitative comments on teaching satisfaction and clinical reasoning skills improvement were queried, and content analysis was performed. RESULTS: Participants in the CMN group outperformed those in the SN group in tests of medical and nursing collaboration abilities as well as knowledge. The CMN group outperformed the SN group in terms of teaching satisfaction evaluation, particularly in terms of fostering learning in the anesthetist specialty, improving clinical practice, fostering motivation, and influencing how people think about challenges at work. Furthermore, participants in the CMN group felt that their clinical reasoning abilities had improved. CONCLUSION: In comparison to the SN group, the CMN group had enhanced outcomes of patient care, medical and nursing collaboration, and clinical reasoning skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8. BioMed Central 2023-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10641995/ /pubmed/37953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ma, Xiaobei Duan, Yi Ma, Yanli Gao, Zhifeng Zhang, Huan Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title | Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title_full | Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title_fullStr | Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title_short | Co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
title_sort | co-teaching in medicine and nursing in training nurse anesthetists: a before-and-after controlled study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04827-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maxiaobei coteachinginmedicineandnursingintrainingnurseanesthetistsabeforeandaftercontrolledstudy AT duanyi coteachinginmedicineandnursingintrainingnurseanesthetistsabeforeandaftercontrolledstudy AT mayanli coteachinginmedicineandnursingintrainingnurseanesthetistsabeforeandaftercontrolledstudy AT gaozhifeng coteachinginmedicineandnursingintrainingnurseanesthetistsabeforeandaftercontrolledstudy AT zhanghuan coteachinginmedicineandnursingintrainingnurseanesthetistsabeforeandaftercontrolledstudy |