Cargando…

Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes

OBJECTIVE: To analyze content validity evidence and response processes of a bank of items for measuring vulnerability to physical inactivity in adults. METHOD: Methodological study, with 13 specialists and 46 representatives of the target population. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and binomial tes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Déborah Santana, Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio, Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa, Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642005/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0563
_version_ 1785146872366628864
author Pereira, Déborah Santana
Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio
Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa
Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães
author_facet Pereira, Déborah Santana
Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio
Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa
Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães
author_sort Pereira, Déborah Santana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze content validity evidence and response processes of a bank of items for measuring vulnerability to physical inactivity in adults. METHOD: Methodological study, with 13 specialists and 46 representatives of the target population. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and binomial test were calculated; data obtained through validity based on response processes were collected through interviews. RESULTS: Of the 105 constructed items, 16 were excluded (CVI<0.78); 89 items showed agreement <80% in the psychometric criteria, being modified. Of the 101 items that remained (CVI>0.78), 34 were changed and 4 were deleted after evaluating the evidence of response processes. In the end, 97 items remained, with a global CVI of 0.92, organized into two dimensions: Subject (CVI=0.91) and Social (CVI=0.94). CONCLUSION: The items presented adequate parameters and evidence of validity; and can subsidize the construction of instruments that consider the subject’s and social vulnerability in understanding physical inactivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106420052023-11-14 Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes Pereira, Déborah Santana Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães Rev Bras Enferm Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze content validity evidence and response processes of a bank of items for measuring vulnerability to physical inactivity in adults. METHOD: Methodological study, with 13 specialists and 46 representatives of the target population. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and binomial test were calculated; data obtained through validity based on response processes were collected through interviews. RESULTS: Of the 105 constructed items, 16 were excluded (CVI<0.78); 89 items showed agreement <80% in the psychometric criteria, being modified. Of the 101 items that remained (CVI>0.78), 34 were changed and 4 were deleted after evaluating the evidence of response processes. In the end, 97 items remained, with a global CVI of 0.92, organized into two dimensions: Subject (CVI=0.91) and Social (CVI=0.94). CONCLUSION: The items presented adequate parameters and evidence of validity; and can subsidize the construction of instruments that consider the subject’s and social vulnerability in understanding physical inactivity. Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642005/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0563 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Pereira, Déborah Santana
Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio
Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa
Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães
Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title_full Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title_fullStr Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title_full_unstemmed Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title_short Vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
title_sort vulnerability to physical inactivity: evidence of content validity and response processes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642005/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2022-0563
work_keys_str_mv AT pereiradeborahsantana vulnerabilitytophysicalinactivityevidenceofcontentvalidityandresponseprocesses
AT florencioraquelsampaio vulnerabilitytophysicalinactivityevidenceofcontentvalidityandresponseprocesses
AT cestarivirnaribeirofeitosa vulnerabilitytophysicalinactivityevidenceofcontentvalidityandresponseprocesses
AT moreiratherezamariamagalhaes vulnerabilitytophysicalinactivityevidenceofcontentvalidityandresponseprocesses