Cargando…
Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175 |
_version_ | 1785146935494049792 |
---|---|
author | Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto Bernabeu García, Andrea Suñol Sala, Jordi Guerrero Villena, Jaime Albero Amorós, Sonia Llacer, Joaquin Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio Ortiz, José A. Pitas, Anna Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael |
author_facet | Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto Bernabeu García, Andrea Suñol Sala, Jordi Guerrero Villena, Jaime Albero Amorós, Sonia Llacer, Joaquin Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio Ortiz, José A. Pitas, Anna Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael |
author_sort | Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5–19) vs. 14 [11–21] and 9 (4–13) vs. 12 (9–17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-001343-44/results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10642283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106422832023-11-14 Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto Bernabeu García, Andrea Suñol Sala, Jordi Guerrero Villena, Jaime Albero Amorós, Sonia Llacer, Joaquin Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio Ortiz, José A. Pitas, Anna Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael Front Reprod Health Reproductive Health The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5–19) vs. 14 [11–21] and 9 (4–13) vs. 12 (9–17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-001343-44/results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10642283/ /pubmed/37965590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175 Text en © 2023 Alvarado Franco, Bernabeu García, Suñol Sala, Guerrero Villena, Albero Amorós, Llacer, Delgado Navas, Ortiz, Pitas, Castillo Farfan and Bernabeu Pérez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Reproductive Health Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto Bernabeu García, Andrea Suñol Sala, Jordi Guerrero Villena, Jaime Albero Amorós, Sonia Llacer, Joaquin Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio Ortiz, José A. Pitas, Anna Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title | Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title_full | Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title_fullStr | Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title_short | Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial |
title_sort | conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. tail trial |
topic | Reproductive Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvaradofrancocarlosalberto conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT bernabeugarciaandrea conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT sunolsalajordi conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT guerrerovillenajaime conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT alberoamorossonia conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT llacerjoaquin conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT delgadonavasricardoantonio conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT ortizjosea conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT pitasanna conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT castillofarfanjuancarlos conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial AT bernabeuperezrafael conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial |