Cargando…

Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial

The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto, Bernabeu García, Andrea, Suñol Sala, Jordi, Guerrero Villena, Jaime, Albero Amorós, Sonia, Llacer, Joaquin, Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio, Ortiz, José A., Pitas, Anna, Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos, Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175
_version_ 1785146935494049792
author Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto
Bernabeu García, Andrea
Suñol Sala, Jordi
Guerrero Villena, Jaime
Albero Amorós, Sonia
Llacer, Joaquin
Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio
Ortiz, José A.
Pitas, Anna
Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos
Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael
author_facet Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto
Bernabeu García, Andrea
Suñol Sala, Jordi
Guerrero Villena, Jaime
Albero Amorós, Sonia
Llacer, Joaquin
Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio
Ortiz, José A.
Pitas, Anna
Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos
Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael
author_sort Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto
collection PubMed
description The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5–19) vs. 14 [11–21] and 9 (4–13) vs. 12 (9–17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-001343-44/results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106422832023-11-14 Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto Bernabeu García, Andrea Suñol Sala, Jordi Guerrero Villena, Jaime Albero Amorós, Sonia Llacer, Joaquin Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio Ortiz, José A. Pitas, Anna Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael Front Reprod Health Reproductive Health The present study compares two protocols for ovarian controlled stimulation in terms of number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. We employed a single injection of 150mcg of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval for TAIL group and a conventional administration of corifollitropin alfa after a 5-day OCP-free interval with additional rFSH from 8th of ovarian controlled stimulation. Prospective, randomized, comparative, non-inferiority, opened and controlled trial carried out in 180 oocyte donors 31 were excluded, 81 were randomized to the control group and 68 to the TAIL group. No differences were found in the number of follicles larger than 14 and 17 mm at triggering day. However, a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes were obtained in TAIL group compared to the control group, expressed as median (interquartile range): 10.5 (5.5–19) vs. 14 [11–21] and 9 (4–13) vs. 12 (9–17) respectively. Additionally, the incidence of failed retrieval or metaphase II oocytes = 0 was higher in TAIL group 7(10.3%) vs. 1(1.2%) p = 0.024. The use of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa after a 7-day oral contraceptive pill-free interval in oocyte donors resulted in a lower number of cumulus-oocyte complexes and metaphase II oocytes. No additional rFSH was administered in this group. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2019-001343-44/results. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10642283/ /pubmed/37965590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175 Text en © 2023 Alvarado Franco, Bernabeu García, Suñol Sala, Guerrero Villena, Albero Amorós, Llacer, Delgado Navas, Ortiz, Pitas, Castillo Farfan and Bernabeu Pérez. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Reproductive Health
Alvarado Franco, Carlos Alberto
Bernabeu García, Andrea
Suñol Sala, Jordi
Guerrero Villena, Jaime
Albero Amorós, Sonia
Llacer, Joaquin
Delgado Navas, Ricardo Antonio
Ortiz, José A.
Pitas, Anna
Castillo Farfan, Juan Carlos
Bernabeu Pérez, Rafael
Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title_full Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title_fullStr Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title_full_unstemmed Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title_short Conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. Tail trial
title_sort conventional ovarian stimulation vs. delayed single dose corifollitropin alfa ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors: a prospective randomized study. tail trial
topic Reproductive Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965590
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1239175
work_keys_str_mv AT alvaradofrancocarlosalberto conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT bernabeugarciaandrea conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT sunolsalajordi conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT guerrerovillenajaime conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT alberoamorossonia conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT llacerjoaquin conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT delgadonavasricardoantonio conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT ortizjosea conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT pitasanna conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT castillofarfanjuancarlos conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial
AT bernabeuperezrafael conventionalovarianstimulationvsdelayedsingledosecorifollitropinalfaovarianstimulationinoocytedonorsaprospectiverandomizedstudytailtrial