Cargando…

A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain

The emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS‐ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS‐ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Minghu, Hu, Zhiwei, Miao, Lihui, Shi, Manman, Gao, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24126
_version_ 1785146944006389760
author Wang, Minghu
Hu, Zhiwei
Miao, Lihui
Shi, Manman
Gao, Qiang
author_facet Wang, Minghu
Hu, Zhiwei
Miao, Lihui
Shi, Manman
Gao, Qiang
author_sort Wang, Minghu
collection PubMed
description The emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS‐ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS‐ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS‐ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95−0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53−0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08−2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02−0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45−106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79−0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS‐ADP identified a considerable number of low‐risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30‐days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106423322023-11-15 A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain Wang, Minghu Hu, Zhiwei Miao, Lihui Shi, Manman Gao, Qiang Clin Cardiol Review The emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol (EDACS‐ADP) are commonly used for risk stratification in undifferentiated patients with acute chest pain. This systematic review aimed to investigate EDACS‐ADP for risk stratification of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain. The PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched for related studies without restrictions on the publication year. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and Stata 16.0 was used to determine the combined sensitivity, specificity, positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR), and negative DLR. Twelve studies comprising 14 290 patients were identified. Of these, 7537 (52.74%) patients were considered low risk, and 67 (0.89%) had major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death within 30 days of the patients' ED presentation. EDACS‐ADP showed a combined sensitivity of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95−0.99); specificity, 0.58 (0.53−0.63); positive DLR, 2.34 (2.08−2.63); negative DLR, 0.04 (0.02−0.09); diagnostic odds ratio, 53.11 (26.45−106.63); and summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve, 0.83 (0.79−0.86). Despite the large statistical heterogeneity of the results, EDACS‐ADP identified a considerable number of low‐risk patients for early discharge, with a specificity >50% and an incidence of MACE within 30‐days of patients' ED presentation <1%. Thus, it is a useful tool with a potential for clinical application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10642332/ /pubmed/37594309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24126 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Wang, Minghu
Hu, Zhiwei
Miao, Lihui
Shi, Manman
Gao, Qiang
A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title_full A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title_fullStr A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title_short A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
title_sort systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594309
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clc.24126
work_keys_str_mv AT wangminghu asystematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT huzhiwei asystematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT miaolihui asystematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT shimanman asystematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT gaoqiang asystematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT wangminghu systematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT huzhiwei systematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT miaolihui systematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT shimanman systematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain
AT gaoqiang systematicreviewoftheapplicabilityofemergencydepartmentassessmentofchestpainscoreaccelerateddiagnosticprotocolforriskstratificationofpatientswithchestpain