Cargando…
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investiga...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142 |
_version_ | 1785146971374223360 |
---|---|
author | Tao, Fang Liu, Dong-Ning He, Peng-Hui Luo, Xin Xu, Chi-Ying Li, Tai-Yuan Duan, Jin-Yuan |
author_facet | Tao, Fang Liu, Dong-Ning He, Peng-Hui Luo, Xin Xu, Chi-Ying Li, Tai-Yuan Duan, Jin-Yuan |
author_sort | Tao, Fang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted. AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response (P > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10642453 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106424532023-11-15 Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer Tao, Fang Liu, Dong-Ning He, Peng-Hui Luo, Xin Xu, Chi-Ying Li, Tai-Yuan Duan, Jin-Yuan World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted. AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response (P > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-27 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10642453/ /pubmed/37969697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Study Tao, Fang Liu, Dong-Ning He, Peng-Hui Luo, Xin Xu, Chi-Ying Li, Tai-Yuan Duan, Jin-Yuan Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title | Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title_full | Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title_short | Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
title_sort | robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery i-type f method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer |
topic | Retrospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642453/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taofang roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT liudongning roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT hepenghui roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT luoxin roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT xuchiying roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT litaiyuan roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer AT duanjinyuan roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer |