Cargando…

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Fang, Liu, Dong-Ning, He, Peng-Hui, Luo, Xin, Xu, Chi-Ying, Li, Tai-Yuan, Duan, Jin-Yuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969697
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142
_version_ 1785146971374223360
author Tao, Fang
Liu, Dong-Ning
He, Peng-Hui
Luo, Xin
Xu, Chi-Ying
Li, Tai-Yuan
Duan, Jin-Yuan
author_facet Tao, Fang
Liu, Dong-Ning
He, Peng-Hui
Luo, Xin
Xu, Chi-Ying
Li, Tai-Yuan
Duan, Jin-Yuan
author_sort Tao, Fang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted. AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response (P > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106424532023-11-15 Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer Tao, Fang Liu, Dong-Ning He, Peng-Hui Luo, Xin Xu, Chi-Ying Li, Tai-Yuan Duan, Jin-Yuan World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Robotic resection using the natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method (R-NOSES I-F) is a novel minimally invasive surgical strategy for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. However, the current literature on this method is limited to case reports, and further investigation into its safety and feasibility is warranted. AIM: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of R-NOSES I-F for the treatment of low rectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2018 to February 2022, 206 patients diagnosed with low rectal cancer at First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University were included in this retrospective analysis. Of these patients, 22 underwent R-NOSES I-F surgery (R-NOSES I-F group) and 76 underwent conventional robotic-assisted low rectal cancer resection (RLRC group). Clinicopathological data of all patients were collected and analyzed. Postoperative outcomes and prognoses were compared between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: Patients in the R-NOSES I-F group had a significantly lower visual analog score for pain on postoperative day 1 (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 2.2 ± 0.6, P = 0.003) and shorter postoperative anal venting time (2.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) than those in the RLRC group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, body mass index, tumor size, TNM stage, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, or inflammatory response (P > 0.05). Postoperative anal and urinary functions, as assessed by Wexner, low anterior resection syndrome, and International Prostate Symptom Scale scores, were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed no significant differences in the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: R-NOSES I-F is a safe and effective minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of lower rectal cancer. It improves pain relief, promotes gastrointestinal function recovery, and helps avoid incision-related complications. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-27 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10642453/ /pubmed/37969697 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Tao, Fang
Liu, Dong-Ning
He, Peng-Hui
Luo, Xin
Xu, Chi-Ying
Li, Tai-Yuan
Duan, Jin-Yuan
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title_full Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title_fullStr Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title_short Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery I-type F method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
title_sort robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery i-type f method vs conventional robotic resection for lower rectal cancer
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969697
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2142
work_keys_str_mv AT taofang roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT liudongning roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT hepenghui roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT luoxin roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT xuchiying roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT litaiyuan roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer
AT duanjinyuan roboticnaturalorificespecimenextractionsurgeryitypefmethodvsconventionalroboticresectionforlowerrectalcancer