Cargando…

Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications are important factors affecting the survival time and quality of life of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. AIM: To investigate and compare the anesthetic effects of intravenous general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia or ultrasound-guided bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ya-Ya, Fu, Hua-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969718
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171
_version_ 1785146972436430848
author Wang, Ya-Ya
Fu, Hua-Jun
author_facet Wang, Ya-Ya
Fu, Hua-Jun
author_sort Wang, Ya-Ya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications are important factors affecting the survival time and quality of life of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. AIM: To investigate and compare the anesthetic effects of intravenous general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia or ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominal plane block (TAPB) in gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 85 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in our hospital from December 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into a TAPB group (n = 45) and epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) according to the different anesthesia and analgesia programs used. The TAPB group received general anesthesia combined with TAPB, and the epidural anesthesia group received general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The pain status, cognitive status, intestinal barrier indicators, recovery quality, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the epidural anesthesia group, the TAPB group’s visual analog scale scores were significantly lower 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the TAPB group was significantly lower than that in the epidural anesthesia group, and the Mini-mental State Examination score 24 h after surgery was significantly higher in the TAPB group than the epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). The levels of diamine oxidase and plasma D-lactate were significantly lower in the TAPB group than the epidural anesthesia group 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The agitation score and the incidence of agitation during recovery were significantly lower in the TAPB group than epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the TAPB group was 4.44%, significantly lower than the 20.00% in the epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia, TAPB combined with general anesthesia had a good analgesic effect in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and can further reduce the incidence of POCD and postoperative complications, improve the levels of intestinal barrier indicators, and improve postoperative recovery quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106424562023-11-15 Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer Wang, Ya-Ya Fu, Hua-Jun World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications are important factors affecting the survival time and quality of life of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. AIM: To investigate and compare the anesthetic effects of intravenous general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia or ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominal plane block (TAPB) in gastric cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. METHODS: The clinical data of 85 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in our hospital from December 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected and divided into a TAPB group (n = 45) and epidural anesthesia group (n = 40) according to the different anesthesia and analgesia programs used. The TAPB group received general anesthesia combined with TAPB, and the epidural anesthesia group received general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. The pain status, cognitive status, intestinal barrier indicators, recovery quality, and incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Compared with the epidural anesthesia group, the TAPB group’s visual analog scale scores were significantly lower 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the TAPB group was significantly lower than that in the epidural anesthesia group, and the Mini-mental State Examination score 24 h after surgery was significantly higher in the TAPB group than the epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). The levels of diamine oxidase and plasma D-lactate were significantly lower in the TAPB group than the epidural anesthesia group 24 h after surgery (P < 0.05). The agitation score and the incidence of agitation during recovery were significantly lower in the TAPB group than epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the TAPB group was 4.44%, significantly lower than the 20.00% in the epidural anesthesia group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia, TAPB combined with general anesthesia had a good analgesic effect in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and can further reduce the incidence of POCD and postoperative complications, improve the levels of intestinal barrier indicators, and improve postoperative recovery quality. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-27 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10642456/ /pubmed/37969718 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Wang, Ya-Ya
Fu, Hua-Jun
Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title_full Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title_fullStr Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title_short Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
title_sort analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic gastric cancer
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969718
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2171
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyaya analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidedbilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockinlaparoscopicgastriccancer
AT fuhuajun analgesiceffectofultrasoundguidedbilateraltransversusabdominisplaneblockinlaparoscopicgastriccancer