Cargando…

The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systemat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharyya, Anit, Hopkinson, Lily D, Nolet, Paul S, Srbely, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637231196647
_version_ 1785146981408047104
author Bhattacharyya, Anit
Hopkinson, Lily D
Nolet, Paul S
Srbely, John
author_facet Bhattacharyya, Anit
Hopkinson, Lily D
Nolet, Paul S
Srbely, John
author_sort Bhattacharyya, Anit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated. RESULTS: Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies (n = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies (n = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75–0.99 and ICC 0.81–0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106424992023-11-15 The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review Bhattacharyya, Anit Hopkinson, Lily D Nolet, Paul S Srbely, John Br J Pain Articles BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-back and neck pain affect a great number of individuals worldwide. The pressure pain threshold has the potential to be a useful quantitative measure of mechanical pain in a clinical setting, if it proves to be reliable in this population. The objectives of this systematic review are to: (1) analyze the literature evaluating the reliability of pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurements in the assessment of neck and low-back pain, (2) summarize the evidence from these studies, and (3) characterize the limitations of PPT measurement. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Relevant literature from PubMed and the Web of Science electronic databases were screened in a 3-step process according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Relevant studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool, and results of all studies were summarized and tabulated. RESULTS: Of 922 citations identified, 11 studies were deemed relevant for critical appraisal, and 8 studies were deemed to have low risk-of bias. Intra-rater reliability, reported in all studies (n = 637) and inter-rater reliability, reported in 2 studies (n = 200) were consistently reported to be good to excellent (ICC 0.75–0.99 and ICC 0.81–0.90, respectively). Studies were also found to have significant variation in PPT measurement procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Though intra- and inter-rater reliability was found to be high in all studies, the variation in PPT measurement protocols could affect validity and absolute reliability. As such, it is recommended that standard guidelines be developed for clinical use. SAGE Publications 2023-08-26 2023-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10642499/ /pubmed/37969131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637231196647 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Bhattacharyya, Anit
Hopkinson, Lily D
Nolet, Paul S
Srbely, John
The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title_full The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title_fullStr The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title_short The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
title_sort reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20494637231196647
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyyaanit thereliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT hopkinsonlilyd thereliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT noletpauls thereliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT srbelyjohn thereliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT bhattacharyyaanit reliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT hopkinsonlilyd reliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT noletpauls reliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview
AT srbelyjohn reliabilityofpressurepainthresholdinindividualswithlowbackorneckpainasystematicreview