Cargando…

Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tadros, Michael M, Boshra, Marian S, Scott, Michael, Fleming, Glenda, Magee, Fidelma, Hamed, Mohammad I, Abuelhana, Ahmed, Courtenay, Aaron, Salem, Heba F, Burnett, Kathryn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117
_version_ 1785147000391467008
author Tadros, Michael M
Boshra, Marian S
Scott, Michael
Fleming, Glenda
Magee, Fidelma
Hamed, Mohammad I
Abuelhana, Ahmed
Courtenay, Aaron
Salem, Heba F
Burnett, Kathryn
author_facet Tadros, Michael M
Boshra, Marian S
Scott, Michael
Fleming, Glenda
Magee, Fidelma
Hamed, Mohammad I
Abuelhana, Ahmed
Courtenay, Aaron
Salem, Heba F
Burnett, Kathryn
author_sort Tadros, Michael M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A mixed prospective-retrospective study was designed to compare pre- and during pandemic antimicrobial prescribing data in both hospitals using a Global Point Prevalence Survey. RESULTS: Of the 591 patients surveyed in both hospitals, 43.8% were treated with 402 antimicrobials. A total of 82.8% of antimicrobial prescriptions were for empirical treatment. No significant difference existed in numbers of patients treated or antimicrobials used before and during the pandemic. There was a slight decrease of 3.3% in the compliance rate with hospital antimicrobial guidelines during the pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when it was 69.5%. Treatment based on patients’ biomarker data also slightly decreased from 83.5% pre-pandemic (2019) to 81.5% during the pandemic (2021). CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall significant impact of the pandemic on the antimicrobial prescribing patterns in either hospital when compared with the pre-pandemic findings. The antimicrobial stewardship programmes would appear to have played an important role in controlling antimicrobial consumption during the pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106426132023-11-14 Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic Tadros, Michael M Boshra, Marian S Scott, Michael Fleming, Glenda Magee, Fidelma Hamed, Mohammad I Abuelhana, Ahmed Courtenay, Aaron Salem, Heba F Burnett, Kathryn JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A mixed prospective-retrospective study was designed to compare pre- and during pandemic antimicrobial prescribing data in both hospitals using a Global Point Prevalence Survey. RESULTS: Of the 591 patients surveyed in both hospitals, 43.8% were treated with 402 antimicrobials. A total of 82.8% of antimicrobial prescriptions were for empirical treatment. No significant difference existed in numbers of patients treated or antimicrobials used before and during the pandemic. There was a slight decrease of 3.3% in the compliance rate with hospital antimicrobial guidelines during the pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when it was 69.5%. Treatment based on patients’ biomarker data also slightly decreased from 83.5% pre-pandemic (2019) to 81.5% during the pandemic (2021). CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall significant impact of the pandemic on the antimicrobial prescribing patterns in either hospital when compared with the pre-pandemic findings. The antimicrobial stewardship programmes would appear to have played an important role in controlling antimicrobial consumption during the pandemic. Oxford University Press 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642613/ /pubmed/37965099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tadros, Michael M
Boshra, Marian S
Scott, Michael
Fleming, Glenda
Magee, Fidelma
Hamed, Mohammad I
Abuelhana, Ahmed
Courtenay, Aaron
Salem, Heba F
Burnett, Kathryn
Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117
work_keys_str_mv AT tadrosmichaelm antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT boshramarians antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT scottmichael antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT flemingglenda antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mageefidelma antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT hamedmohammadi antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT abuelhanaahmed antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT courtenayaaron antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT salemhebaf antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic
AT burnettkathryn antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic