Cargando…
Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117 |
_version_ | 1785147000391467008 |
---|---|
author | Tadros, Michael M Boshra, Marian S Scott, Michael Fleming, Glenda Magee, Fidelma Hamed, Mohammad I Abuelhana, Ahmed Courtenay, Aaron Salem, Heba F Burnett, Kathryn |
author_facet | Tadros, Michael M Boshra, Marian S Scott, Michael Fleming, Glenda Magee, Fidelma Hamed, Mohammad I Abuelhana, Ahmed Courtenay, Aaron Salem, Heba F Burnett, Kathryn |
author_sort | Tadros, Michael M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A mixed prospective-retrospective study was designed to compare pre- and during pandemic antimicrobial prescribing data in both hospitals using a Global Point Prevalence Survey. RESULTS: Of the 591 patients surveyed in both hospitals, 43.8% were treated with 402 antimicrobials. A total of 82.8% of antimicrobial prescriptions were for empirical treatment. No significant difference existed in numbers of patients treated or antimicrobials used before and during the pandemic. There was a slight decrease of 3.3% in the compliance rate with hospital antimicrobial guidelines during the pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when it was 69.5%. Treatment based on patients’ biomarker data also slightly decreased from 83.5% pre-pandemic (2019) to 81.5% during the pandemic (2021). CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall significant impact of the pandemic on the antimicrobial prescribing patterns in either hospital when compared with the pre-pandemic findings. The antimicrobial stewardship programmes would appear to have played an important role in controlling antimicrobial consumption during the pandemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10642613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106426132023-11-14 Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic Tadros, Michael M Boshra, Marian S Scott, Michael Fleming, Glenda Magee, Fidelma Hamed, Mohammad I Abuelhana, Ahmed Courtenay, Aaron Salem, Heba F Burnett, Kathryn JAC Antimicrob Resist Original Article BACKGROUND: Increased antimicrobial resistance patterns lead to limited options for antimicrobial agents, affecting patient health and increasing hospital costs. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the antimicrobial prescribing patterns at two district hospitals in Northern Ireland before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A mixed prospective-retrospective study was designed to compare pre- and during pandemic antimicrobial prescribing data in both hospitals using a Global Point Prevalence Survey. RESULTS: Of the 591 patients surveyed in both hospitals, 43.8% were treated with 402 antimicrobials. A total of 82.8% of antimicrobial prescriptions were for empirical treatment. No significant difference existed in numbers of patients treated or antimicrobials used before and during the pandemic. There was a slight decrease of 3.3% in the compliance rate with hospital antimicrobial guidelines during the pandemic when compared with the pre-pandemic year of 2019, when it was 69.5%. Treatment based on patients’ biomarker data also slightly decreased from 83.5% pre-pandemic (2019) to 81.5% during the pandemic (2021). CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall significant impact of the pandemic on the antimicrobial prescribing patterns in either hospital when compared with the pre-pandemic findings. The antimicrobial stewardship programmes would appear to have played an important role in controlling antimicrobial consumption during the pandemic. Oxford University Press 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642613/ /pubmed/37965099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Tadros, Michael M Boshra, Marian S Scott, Michael Fleming, Glenda Magee, Fidelma Hamed, Mohammad I Abuelhana, Ahmed Courtenay, Aaron Salem, Heba F Burnett, Kathryn Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | antimicrobial prescribing in a secondary care setting during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlad117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tadrosmichaelm antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT boshramarians antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT scottmichael antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT flemingglenda antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT mageefidelma antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT hamedmohammadi antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT abuelhanaahmed antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT courtenayaaron antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT salemhebaf antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic AT burnettkathryn antimicrobialprescribinginasecondarycaresettingduringthecovid19pandemic |