Cargando…

Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the incidence of recurrent uterine rupture in pregnant women. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for observational studies was performed from 2000 to 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Of the 7,440 arti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugai, Shunya, Yamawaki, Kaoru, Haino, Kazufumi, Yoshihara, Kosuke, Nishijima, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005418
_version_ 1785147006432313344
author Sugai, Shunya
Yamawaki, Kaoru
Haino, Kazufumi
Yoshihara, Kosuke
Nishijima, Koji
author_facet Sugai, Shunya
Yamawaki, Kaoru
Haino, Kazufumi
Yoshihara, Kosuke
Nishijima, Koji
author_sort Sugai, Shunya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the incidence of recurrent uterine rupture in pregnant women. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for observational studies was performed from 2000 to 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Of the 7,440 articles screened, 13 studies were included in the final review. We included studies of previous uterine ruptures that were complete uterine ruptures, defined as destruction of all uterine layers, including the serosa. The primary outcome was the pooled incidence of recurrent uterine rupture. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) value. Subgroup analyses were conducted in terms of the country development status, year of publication, and study size (single center vs national study). The secondary outcomes comprised the following: 1) mean gestational age at which recurrent rupture occurred, 2) mean gestational age at which delivery occurred without recurrent rupture, and 3) perinatal complications (blood loss, transfusion, maternal mortality, and neonatal mortality). TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A random-effects model was used to pool the incidence or mean value and the corresponding 95% CI with R software. The pooled incidence of recurrent uterine rupture was 10% (95% CI 6–17%). Developed countries had a significantly lower uterine rupture recurrence rate than less developed countries (6% vs 15%, P=.04). Year of publication and study size were not significantly associated with recurrent uterine rupture. The mean number of gestational weeks at the time of recurrent uterine rupture was 32.49 (95% CI 29.90–35.08). The mean number of gestational weeks at the time of delivery without recurrent uterine rupture was 35.77 (95% CI 34.95–36.60). The maternal mortality rate was 5% (95% CI 2–11%), and the neonatal mortality rate was 5% (95% CI 3–10%). Morbidity from hemorrhage, such as bleeding and transfusion, was not reported in any study and could not be evaluated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review estimated a 10% incidence of recurrent uterine rupture. This finding will enable appropriate risk counseling in patients with prior uterine rupture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42023395010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106427012023-11-15 Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sugai, Shunya Yamawaki, Kaoru Haino, Kazufumi Yoshihara, Kosuke Nishijima, Koji Obstet Gynecol Reviews OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the incidence of recurrent uterine rupture in pregnant women. DATA SOURCES: A literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov for observational studies was performed from 2000 to 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Of the 7,440 articles screened, 13 studies were included in the final review. We included studies of previous uterine ruptures that were complete uterine ruptures, defined as destruction of all uterine layers, including the serosa. The primary outcome was the pooled incidence of recurrent uterine rupture. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) value. Subgroup analyses were conducted in terms of the country development status, year of publication, and study size (single center vs national study). The secondary outcomes comprised the following: 1) mean gestational age at which recurrent rupture occurred, 2) mean gestational age at which delivery occurred without recurrent rupture, and 3) perinatal complications (blood loss, transfusion, maternal mortality, and neonatal mortality). TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: A random-effects model was used to pool the incidence or mean value and the corresponding 95% CI with R software. The pooled incidence of recurrent uterine rupture was 10% (95% CI 6–17%). Developed countries had a significantly lower uterine rupture recurrence rate than less developed countries (6% vs 15%, P=.04). Year of publication and study size were not significantly associated with recurrent uterine rupture. The mean number of gestational weeks at the time of recurrent uterine rupture was 32.49 (95% CI 29.90–35.08). The mean number of gestational weeks at the time of delivery without recurrent uterine rupture was 35.77 (95% CI 34.95–36.60). The maternal mortality rate was 5% (95% CI 2–11%), and the neonatal mortality rate was 5% (95% CI 3–10%). Morbidity from hemorrhage, such as bleeding and transfusion, was not reported in any study and could not be evaluated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review estimated a 10% incidence of recurrent uterine rupture. This finding will enable appropriate risk counseling in patients with prior uterine rupture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42023395010. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-12 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10642701/ /pubmed/37884008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005418 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Reviews
Sugai, Shunya
Yamawaki, Kaoru
Haino, Kazufumi
Yoshihara, Kosuke
Nishijima, Koji
Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Incidence of Recurrent Uterine Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort incidence of recurrent uterine rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37884008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005418
work_keys_str_mv AT sugaishunya incidenceofrecurrentuterineruptureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yamawakikaoru incidenceofrecurrentuterineruptureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hainokazufumi incidenceofrecurrentuterineruptureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshiharakosuke incidenceofrecurrentuterineruptureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nishijimakoji incidenceofrecurrentuterineruptureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis