Cargando…

Safety of the One Step Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (Push-PEG) Button in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-systems are essential tools for enteral feeding in a broad variety of pediatric patients. The One Step (“Push-PEG”) technique allows the direct introduction of a PEG-Button. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and parental view of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brinkmann, Julian, Fahle, Luise, Broekaert, Ilse, Hünseler, Christoph, Joachim, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37608440
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000003930
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-systems are essential tools for enteral feeding in a broad variety of pediatric patients. The One Step (“Push-PEG”) technique allows the direct introduction of a PEG-Button. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and parental view of the Push-PEG technique. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective data and questionnaire (SDC, http://links.lww.com/MPG/D296) based study including all pediatric patients receiving a PEG via push or pull technique between 2015 until end of 2020 and compared these 2 groups. The primary outcome was the detection of minor and major complications. Secondary outcomes were growth, thriving, and parental contentment using a Likert-scaled questionnaire. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in the basic data regarding age, weight, or diagnosis category. Overall complication rate was 34.9%. The Push-PEG group showed a lower rate of complications (32.7% vs 38.7%) and a lower rate of major complications (4.1% vs 8.8%), although the difference is not significant. Thirty-four families completed the questionnaire (SDC, http://links.lww.com/MPG/D296) (response rate 40%). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding answers of the Likert-scaled questions. CONCLUSION: Push-PEG placement seems to be as safe as placement via traditional pull technique, even in small infants more than 2.8 months and 4 kg. As Push-PEG placement requires less follow-up interventions it may show significant advantages and could be the method of first choice in many cases.