Cargando…

Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach

Background: Although several strategies for modelling competing events in discrete event simulation (DES) exist, a methodological gap for the event-specific probabilities and distributions (ESPD) approach when dealing with censored data remains. This study defines and illustrates the ESPD strategy f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Franchini, Fanny, Fedyashov, Victor, IJzerman, Maarten J., Degeling, Koen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1255021
_version_ 1785147019736645632
author Franchini, Fanny
Fedyashov, Victor
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Degeling, Koen
author_facet Franchini, Fanny
Fedyashov, Victor
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Degeling, Koen
author_sort Franchini, Fanny
collection PubMed
description Background: Although several strategies for modelling competing events in discrete event simulation (DES) exist, a methodological gap for the event-specific probabilities and distributions (ESPD) approach when dealing with censored data remains. This study defines and illustrates the ESPD strategy for censored data. Methods: The ESPD approach assumes that events are generated through a two-step process. First, the type of event is selected according to some (unknown) mixture proportions. Next, the times of occurrence of the events are sampled from a corresponding survival distribution. Both of these steps can be modelled based on covariates. Performance was evaluated through a simulation study, considering sample size and levels of censoring. Additionally, an oncology-related case study was conducted to assess the ability to produce realistic results, and to demonstrate its implementation using both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks in R. Results: The simulation study showed good performance of the ESPD approach, with accuracy decreasing as sample sizes decreased and censoring levels increased. The average relative absolute error of the event probability (95%-confidence interval) ranged from 0.04 (0.00; 0.10) to 0.23 (0.01; 0.66) for 60% censoring and sample size 50, showing that increased censoring and decreased sample size resulted in lower accuracy. The approach yielded realistic results in the case study. Discussion: The ESPD approach can be used to model competing events in DES based on censored data. Further research is warranted to compare the approach to other modelling approaches for DES, and to evaluate its usefulness in estimating cumulative event incidences in a broader context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106427692023-11-14 Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach Franchini, Fanny Fedyashov, Victor IJzerman, Maarten J. Degeling, Koen Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Background: Although several strategies for modelling competing events in discrete event simulation (DES) exist, a methodological gap for the event-specific probabilities and distributions (ESPD) approach when dealing with censored data remains. This study defines and illustrates the ESPD strategy for censored data. Methods: The ESPD approach assumes that events are generated through a two-step process. First, the type of event is selected according to some (unknown) mixture proportions. Next, the times of occurrence of the events are sampled from a corresponding survival distribution. Both of these steps can be modelled based on covariates. Performance was evaluated through a simulation study, considering sample size and levels of censoring. Additionally, an oncology-related case study was conducted to assess the ability to produce realistic results, and to demonstrate its implementation using both frequentist and Bayesian frameworks in R. Results: The simulation study showed good performance of the ESPD approach, with accuracy decreasing as sample sizes decreased and censoring levels increased. The average relative absolute error of the event probability (95%-confidence interval) ranged from 0.04 (0.00; 0.10) to 0.23 (0.01; 0.66) for 60% censoring and sample size 50, showing that increased censoring and decreased sample size resulted in lower accuracy. The approach yielded realistic results in the case study. Discussion: The ESPD approach can be used to model competing events in DES based on censored data. Further research is warranted to compare the approach to other modelling approaches for DES, and to evaluate its usefulness in estimating cumulative event incidences in a broader context. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10642769/ /pubmed/37964874 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1255021 Text en Copyright © 2023 Franchini, Fedyashov, IJzerman and Degeling. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Franchini, Fanny
Fedyashov, Victor
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Degeling, Koen
Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title_full Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title_fullStr Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title_full_unstemmed Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title_short Implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
title_sort implementing competing risks in discrete event simulation: the event-specific probabilities and distributions approach
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37964874
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1255021
work_keys_str_mv AT franchinifanny implementingcompetingrisksindiscreteeventsimulationtheeventspecificprobabilitiesanddistributionsapproach
AT fedyashovvictor implementingcompetingrisksindiscreteeventsimulationtheeventspecificprobabilitiesanddistributionsapproach
AT ijzermanmaartenj implementingcompetingrisksindiscreteeventsimulationtheeventspecificprobabilitiesanddistributionsapproach
AT degelingkoen implementingcompetingrisksindiscreteeventsimulationtheeventspecificprobabilitiesanddistributionsapproach