Cargando…
Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026 |
_version_ | 1785147032380375040 |
---|---|
author | Conrad, Katharina Forkmann, Thomas Schreiber, Dajana Teismann, Tobias Glaesmer, Heide Spangenberg, Lena Schönfelder, Antje Hallensleben, Nina Paashaus, Laura Juckel, Georg Höller, Inken |
author_facet | Conrad, Katharina Forkmann, Thomas Schreiber, Dajana Teismann, Tobias Glaesmer, Heide Spangenberg, Lena Schönfelder, Antje Hallensleben, Nina Paashaus, Laura Juckel, Georg Höller, Inken |
author_sort | Conrad, Katharina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongingness (TB). Suicidal behavior ultimately occurs if people have a Capability for Suicide. In past studies, the validity of TB was often not empirically confirmed, questioning which of the aspects of TB are central and related to suicidal ideation and whether applied measurement methods adequately capture the construct. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,404 individuals from different clinical and nonclinical settings, 30% (1,023) of whom reported suicidal ideation, two network analyses were conducted on the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) and a variable mapping suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that some items of the INQ were not related to suicidal ideation and the most central items did not have the strongest associations to suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a shortened version of the INQ with the four items that showed the strongest associations with suicidal ideation in the network analyses was suggested. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10642825 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106428252023-11-14 Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire Conrad, Katharina Forkmann, Thomas Schreiber, Dajana Teismann, Tobias Glaesmer, Heide Spangenberg, Lena Schönfelder, Antje Hallensleben, Nina Paashaus, Laura Juckel, Georg Höller, Inken PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongingness (TB). Suicidal behavior ultimately occurs if people have a Capability for Suicide. In past studies, the validity of TB was often not empirically confirmed, questioning which of the aspects of TB are central and related to suicidal ideation and whether applied measurement methods adequately capture the construct. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,404 individuals from different clinical and nonclinical settings, 30% (1,023) of whom reported suicidal ideation, two network analyses were conducted on the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) and a variable mapping suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that some items of the INQ were not related to suicidal ideation and the most central items did not have the strongest associations to suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a shortened version of the INQ with the four items that showed the strongest associations with suicidal ideation in the network analyses was suggested. Public Library of Science 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642825/ /pubmed/37956124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026 Text en © 2023 Conrad et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Conrad, Katharina Forkmann, Thomas Schreiber, Dajana Teismann, Tobias Glaesmer, Heide Spangenberg, Lena Schönfelder, Antje Hallensleben, Nina Paashaus, Laura Juckel, Georg Höller, Inken Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title | Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title_full | Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title_short | Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire |
title_sort | understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the interpersonal needs questionnaire |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642825/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT conradkatharina understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT forkmannthomas understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT schreiberdajana understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT teismanntobias understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT glaesmerheide understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT spangenberglena understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT schonfelderantje understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT hallenslebennina understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT paashauslaura understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT juckelgeorg understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire AT hollerinken understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire |