Cargando…

Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conrad, Katharina, Forkmann, Thomas, Schreiber, Dajana, Teismann, Tobias, Glaesmer, Heide, Spangenberg, Lena, Schönfelder, Antje, Hallensleben, Nina, Paashaus, Laura, Juckel, Georg, Höller, Inken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026
_version_ 1785147032380375040
author Conrad, Katharina
Forkmann, Thomas
Schreiber, Dajana
Teismann, Tobias
Glaesmer, Heide
Spangenberg, Lena
Schönfelder, Antje
Hallensleben, Nina
Paashaus, Laura
Juckel, Georg
Höller, Inken
author_facet Conrad, Katharina
Forkmann, Thomas
Schreiber, Dajana
Teismann, Tobias
Glaesmer, Heide
Spangenberg, Lena
Schönfelder, Antje
Hallensleben, Nina
Paashaus, Laura
Juckel, Georg
Höller, Inken
author_sort Conrad, Katharina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongingness (TB). Suicidal behavior ultimately occurs if people have a Capability for Suicide. In past studies, the validity of TB was often not empirically confirmed, questioning which of the aspects of TB are central and related to suicidal ideation and whether applied measurement methods adequately capture the construct. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,404 individuals from different clinical and nonclinical settings, 30% (1,023) of whom reported suicidal ideation, two network analyses were conducted on the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) and a variable mapping suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that some items of the INQ were not related to suicidal ideation and the most central items did not have the strongest associations to suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a shortened version of the INQ with the four items that showed the strongest associations with suicidal ideation in the network analyses was suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106428252023-11-14 Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire Conrad, Katharina Forkmann, Thomas Schreiber, Dajana Teismann, Tobias Glaesmer, Heide Spangenberg, Lena Schönfelder, Antje Hallensleben, Nina Paashaus, Laura Juckel, Georg Höller, Inken PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Identifying various interacting risk factors for suicidality is important to develop preventive measures. The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior (IPTS) postulates suicidal ideation resulting from the occurrence of Perceived Burdensomeness (PB) and Thwarted Belongingness (TB). Suicidal behavior ultimately occurs if people have a Capability for Suicide. In past studies, the validity of TB was often not empirically confirmed, questioning which of the aspects of TB are central and related to suicidal ideation and whether applied measurement methods adequately capture the construct. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,404 individuals from different clinical and nonclinical settings, 30% (1,023) of whom reported suicidal ideation, two network analyses were conducted on the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ) and a variable mapping suicidal ideation. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that some items of the INQ were not related to suicidal ideation and the most central items did not have the strongest associations to suicidal ideation. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a shortened version of the INQ with the four items that showed the strongest associations with suicidal ideation in the network analyses was suggested. Public Library of Science 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642825/ /pubmed/37956124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026 Text en © 2023 Conrad et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conrad, Katharina
Forkmann, Thomas
Schreiber, Dajana
Teismann, Tobias
Glaesmer, Heide
Spangenberg, Lena
Schönfelder, Antje
Hallensleben, Nina
Paashaus, Laura
Juckel, Georg
Höller, Inken
Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title_full Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title_fullStr Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title_short Understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire
title_sort understanding suicidal ideation–a network analysis of the interpersonal needs questionnaire
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0293026
work_keys_str_mv AT conradkatharina understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT forkmannthomas understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT schreiberdajana understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT teismanntobias understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT glaesmerheide understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT spangenberglena understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT schonfelderantje understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT hallenslebennina understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT paashauslaura understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT juckelgeorg understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire
AT hollerinken understandingsuicidalideationanetworkanalysisoftheinterpersonalneedsquestionnaire