Cargando…

A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and stroke measure heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those meaningful to patients. A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Malley, Nicola, Coote, Susan, Staunton, Fiona McCullough, O’Connor, Eileen, Clifford, Amanda M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294193
_version_ 1785147037010886656
author O’Malley, Nicola
Coote, Susan
Staunton, Fiona McCullough
O’Connor, Eileen
Clifford, Amanda M.
author_facet O’Malley, Nicola
Coote, Susan
Staunton, Fiona McCullough
O’Connor, Eileen
Clifford, Amanda M.
author_sort O’Malley, Nicola
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and stroke measure heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those meaningful to patients. A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of outcomes that should be assessed in all trials within a research area. The aim of this study was to develop a COS for evaluating mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke in non-acute and community settings, with input from relevant stakeholder groups. METHODS: Previously published research undertaken by the team, including a qualitative study with 20 patients and a review of the literature, were used to derive a longlist of potential outcomes. Outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the COS using a three-round online Delphi survey. A multi-stakeholder, consensus meeting was conducted to agree upon the final COS and to provide a recommendation for a single outcome measure for each outcome in the COS. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants were recruited across four stakeholder groups (researchers, patients, clinicians, and service-planners/policymakers). A total of 42 participants (87.5%) completed all three rounds of the surveys. Sixty-two outcomes were considered for inclusion in the COS throughout the Delphi process. A total of 15 participants attended the consensus meeting where they agreed upon the final COS and accompanying measurement instruments: fall incidence, injurious fall incidence, quality of life, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, activity curtailment due to fear of falling, and cost-effectiveness. Attendees at the consensus meeting recommended that the proposed mechanism of impact of an intervention is considered when selecting additional outcomes outside of those in the COS to assess. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke. It is recommended that this COS and accompanying measurement instruments be used in all future trials in this research area so that findings can be combined and compared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642845
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106428452023-11-14 A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke O’Malley, Nicola Coote, Susan Staunton, Fiona McCullough O’Connor, Eileen Clifford, Amanda M. PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and stroke measure heterogeneous outcomes, often omitting those meaningful to patients. A core outcome set (COS) is a standardised set of outcomes that should be assessed in all trials within a research area. The aim of this study was to develop a COS for evaluating mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke in non-acute and community settings, with input from relevant stakeholder groups. METHODS: Previously published research undertaken by the team, including a qualitative study with 20 patients and a review of the literature, were used to derive a longlist of potential outcomes. Outcomes were prioritised for inclusion in the COS using a three-round online Delphi survey. A multi-stakeholder, consensus meeting was conducted to agree upon the final COS and to provide a recommendation for a single outcome measure for each outcome in the COS. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants were recruited across four stakeholder groups (researchers, patients, clinicians, and service-planners/policymakers). A total of 42 participants (87.5%) completed all three rounds of the surveys. Sixty-two outcomes were considered for inclusion in the COS throughout the Delphi process. A total of 15 participants attended the consensus meeting where they agreed upon the final COS and accompanying measurement instruments: fall incidence, injurious fall incidence, quality of life, falls self-efficacy, fear of falling, activity curtailment due to fear of falling, and cost-effectiveness. Attendees at the consensus meeting recommended that the proposed mechanism of impact of an intervention is considered when selecting additional outcomes outside of those in the COS to assess. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a COS for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with MS, PD and stroke. It is recommended that this COS and accompanying measurement instruments be used in all future trials in this research area so that findings can be combined and compared. Public Library of Science 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10642845/ /pubmed/37956176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294193 Text en © 2023 O’Malley et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Malley, Nicola
Coote, Susan
Staunton, Fiona McCullough
O’Connor, Eileen
Clifford, Amanda M.
A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title_full A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title_fullStr A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title_full_unstemmed A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title_short A core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson’s Disease and stroke
title_sort core outcome set for evaluating the effectiveness of mixed-diagnosis falls prevention interventions for people with multiple sclerosis, parkinson’s disease and stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642845/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37956176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294193
work_keys_str_mv AT omalleynicola acoreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT cootesusan acoreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT stauntonfionamccullough acoreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT oconnoreileen acoreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT cliffordamandam acoreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT omalleynicola coreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT cootesusan coreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT stauntonfionamccullough coreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT oconnoreileen coreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke
AT cliffordamandam coreoutcomesetforevaluatingtheeffectivenessofmixeddiagnosisfallspreventioninterventionsforpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisparkinsonsdiseaseandstroke