Cargando…
Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community onco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37897263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182 |
_version_ | 1785147040556122112 |
---|---|
author | Patt, Debra A. Patel, Amila Meera Bhardwaj, Arun Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth Christman, Amanda Amondikar, Ninad Escudier, Susan Marie Townsend, Sydney Books, Holly Basch, Ethan |
author_facet | Patt, Debra A. Patel, Amila Meera Bhardwaj, Arun Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth Christman, Amanda Amondikar, Ninad Escudier, Susan Marie Townsend, Sydney Books, Holly Basch, Ethan |
author_sort | Patt, Debra A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS: This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS: Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P = .007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P = .002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P > .05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P > .05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P = .003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P = .03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION: Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10642897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106428972023-11-14 Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study Patt, Debra A. Patel, Amila Meera Bhardwaj, Arun Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth Christman, Amanda Amondikar, Ninad Escudier, Susan Marie Townsend, Sydney Books, Holly Basch, Ethan JCO Clin Cancer Inform ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS: This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS: Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P = .007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P = .002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P > .05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P > .05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P = .003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P = .03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION: Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10642897/ /pubmed/37897263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182 Text en © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Patt, Debra A. Patel, Amila Meera Bhardwaj, Arun Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth Christman, Amanda Amondikar, Ninad Escudier, Susan Marie Townsend, Sydney Books, Holly Basch, Ethan Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title | Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title_full | Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title_fullStr | Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title_short | Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study |
title_sort | impact of remote symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes on hospitalization, survival, and cost in community oncology practice: the texas two-step study |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37897263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pattdebraa impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT patelamilameera impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT bhardwajarun impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT hudsonkathrynelizabeth impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT christmanamanda impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT amondikarninad impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT escudiersusanmarie impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT townsendsydney impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT booksholly impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy AT baschethan impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy |