Cargando…

Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study

PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community onco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patt, Debra A., Patel, Amila Meera, Bhardwaj, Arun, Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth, Christman, Amanda, Amondikar, Ninad, Escudier, Susan Marie, Townsend, Sydney, Books, Holly, Basch, Ethan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37897263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182
_version_ 1785147040556122112
author Patt, Debra A.
Patel, Amila Meera
Bhardwaj, Arun
Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth
Christman, Amanda
Amondikar, Ninad
Escudier, Susan Marie
Townsend, Sydney
Books, Holly
Basch, Ethan
author_facet Patt, Debra A.
Patel, Amila Meera
Bhardwaj, Arun
Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth
Christman, Amanda
Amondikar, Ninad
Escudier, Susan Marie
Townsend, Sydney
Books, Holly
Basch, Ethan
author_sort Patt, Debra A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS: This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS: Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P = .007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P = .002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P > .05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P > .05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P = .003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P = .03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION: Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10642897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106428972023-11-14 Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study Patt, Debra A. Patel, Amila Meera Bhardwaj, Arun Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth Christman, Amanda Amondikar, Ninad Escudier, Susan Marie Townsend, Sydney Books, Holly Basch, Ethan JCO Clin Cancer Inform ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: There is raising interest to implement electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) for symptom monitoring to enhance the quality of cancer care. Step 1 of the Texas Two-Step Study demonstrated successful implementation of an ePRO system in >200 sites of service of a large community oncology practice. We now report step 2 of this study which evaluates the impact of ePROs on outcomes among patients enrolled in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Oncology Care Model (OCM) program. METHODS: This observational study focused on patients with metastatic cancer enrolled in OCM at large community oncology practice located in Texas between July 2020 and December 2020. Patients who completed ≥1 survey via the ePRO tool were included in the study group and were propensity score matched with patients in a control group. Adverse events (AEs; hospitalizations, emergency department visits, deaths) and total cost of care were a priori study outcomes. Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively, with multivariable logistic regression for adjustment of covariates. RESULTS: Of 831 patients with metastatic cancer, 458 matched patients (229/group) were identified, with 52% male and a mean age of 74 years. Mean total AEs were lower in the study group compared with control (0.98 v 1.41; P = .007), with decreased hospitalizations (20% v 32.5%; P = .002), emergency visits (38.4% v 42.3%; P > .05), and deaths (11.8% v 16.6%; P > .05). Average number of hospitalizations was lower (0.28 v 0.52; P = .003) with reduced mean duration of hospitalizations (1.9 vs 3.2 d; P = .03). The total cost of care was reduced by an average of $1,146 per member per month. CONCLUSION: Symptom monitoring with ePROs improved quality and value of cancer care delivery by reducing hospitalizations, emergency visits, and deaths while lowering cost of care in a large oncology practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2023-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10642897/ /pubmed/37897263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182 Text en © 2023 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Patt, Debra A.
Patel, Amila Meera
Bhardwaj, Arun
Hudson, Kathryn Elizabeth
Christman, Amanda
Amondikar, Ninad
Escudier, Susan Marie
Townsend, Sydney
Books, Holly
Basch, Ethan
Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title_full Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title_fullStr Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title_short Impact of Remote Symptom Monitoring With Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on Hospitalization, Survival, and Cost in Community Oncology Practice: The Texas Two-Step Study
title_sort impact of remote symptom monitoring with electronic patient-reported outcomes on hospitalization, survival, and cost in community oncology practice: the texas two-step study
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37897263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00182
work_keys_str_mv AT pattdebraa impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT patelamilameera impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT bhardwajarun impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT hudsonkathrynelizabeth impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT christmanamanda impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT amondikarninad impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT escudiersusanmarie impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT townsendsydney impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT booksholly impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy
AT baschethan impactofremotesymptommonitoringwithelectronicpatientreportedoutcomesonhospitalizationsurvivalandcostincommunityoncologypracticethetexastwostepstudy