Cargando…

Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?

BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khazali, S, Bachi, A, Carpenter, T.T., Moors, A, Ballard, K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37742199
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085
_version_ 1785147061709045760
author Khazali, S
Bachi, A
Carpenter, T.T.
Moors, A
Ballard, K
author_facet Khazali, S
Bachi, A
Carpenter, T.T.
Moors, A
Ballard, K
author_sort Khazali, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos. RESULTS: The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra- class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92- 0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24). CONCLUSION: GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills. WHAT'S NEW? We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106430112023-11-15 Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? Khazali, S Bachi, A Carpenter, T.T. Moors, A Ballard, K Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Article BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos. RESULTS: The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra- class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92- 0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24). CONCLUSION: GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills. WHAT'S NEW? We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study. Universa Press 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10643011/ /pubmed/37742199 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085 Text en Copyright © 2023 Facts, Views & Vision https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khazali, S
Bachi, A
Carpenter, T.T.
Moors, A
Ballard, K
Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title_full Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title_fullStr Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title_short Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
title_sort development and validation of glvs (generic laparoscopic video scoring system), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37742199
http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085
work_keys_str_mv AT khazalis developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion
AT bachia developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion
AT carpentertt developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion
AT moorsa developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion
AT ballardk developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion