Cargando…
Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version?
BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a no...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Universa Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37742199 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085 |
_version_ | 1785147061709045760 |
---|---|
author | Khazali, S Bachi, A Carpenter, T.T. Moors, A Ballard, K |
author_facet | Khazali, S Bachi, A Carpenter, T.T. Moors, A Ballard, K |
author_sort | Khazali, S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos. RESULTS: The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra- class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92- 0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24). CONCLUSION: GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills. WHAT'S NEW? We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10643011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Universa Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106430112023-11-15 Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? Khazali, S Bachi, A Carpenter, T.T. Moors, A Ballard, K Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Article BACKGROUND: Anonymized videotaped endoscopic procedures can be used for the assessment of surgical competence, but a reliable non-procedure-specific scoring system is needed for gynaecology. OBJECTIVES: To design and evaluate the validity of the Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System (GLVS), a novel tool in the assessment of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen anonymized unedited video recordings of various gynaecological laparoscopic procedures and the 4-minute-long edited versions of the same videos were independently scored by two experts, twice, using GLVS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Internal consistency reliability, test-retest, and inter-rater reliability of GLVS. We also compared the scored achieved by edited videos with those of the full-length version of the same videos. RESULTS: The mean score achieved by 4-minute-long edited videos was similar to that of the unedited version (p= 0.13 - 0.19). There was excellent correlation between the pooled scores for edited and unedited versions (intra- class correlation coefficient = 0.86). GLVS had excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha 0.92- 0.97). Test-retest and inter-rater reliability were generally better for edited 4-minute-long videos compared to their full-length version. Test-retest reliability for edited videos was excellent for scorer 1 and good for scorer 2 with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.88 and 0.62 respectively. Inter-rater reliability was good for edited videos (ICC=0.64) but poor for full-length versions (ICC= -0.24). CONCLUSION: GLVS allows for objective surgical skills assessment using anonymized shortened self-edited videos of basic gynaecological laparoscopic procedures. Shortened video clips of procedures seem to be representative of their full-length version for the assessment of surgical skills. WHAT'S NEW? We devised and undertook a validation study for a novel tool to assess surgical skills using surgical video clips. We believe this addition clearly delineates the unique contributions of our study. Universa Press 2023-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10643011/ /pubmed/37742199 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085 Text en Copyright © 2023 Facts, Views & Vision https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Khazali, S Bachi, A Carpenter, T.T. Moors, A Ballard, K Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title | Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title_full | Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title_short | Development and validation of GLVS (Generic Laparoscopic Video Scoring System), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: Are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
title_sort | development and validation of glvs (generic laparoscopic video scoring system), a tool for assessment of laparoscopic skills in gynaecology using videotaped procedures: are edited videos representative of their full-length version? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37742199 http://dx.doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.15.2.085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khazalis developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion AT bachia developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion AT carpentertt developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion AT moorsa developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion AT ballardk developmentandvalidationofglvsgenericlaparoscopicvideoscoringsystematoolforassessmentoflaparoscopicskillsingynaecologyusingvideotapedproceduresareeditedvideosrepresentativeoftheirfulllengthversion |