Cargando…

Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking

Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krauze, Linda, Delesa-Velina, Mara, Pladere, Tatjana, Krumina, Gunta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bern Open Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965285
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.16.1.4
_version_ 1785147069769449472
author Krauze, Linda
Delesa-Velina, Mara
Pladere, Tatjana
Krumina, Gunta
author_facet Krauze, Linda
Delesa-Velina, Mara
Pladere, Tatjana
Krumina, Gunta
author_sort Krauze, Linda
collection PubMed
description Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Bern Open Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106430482023-11-14 Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking Krauze, Linda Delesa-Velina, Mara Pladere, Tatjana Krumina, Gunta J Eye Mov Res Research Article Precise perception of three-dimensional (3D) images is crucial for a rewarding experience when using novel displays. However, the capability of the human visual system to perceive binocular disparities varies across the visual field meaning that depth perception might be affected by the two-dimensional (2D) layout of items on the screen. Nevertheless, potential difficulties in perceiving 3D images during free viewing have received only a little attention so far, limiting opportunities to enhance visual effectiveness of information presentation. The aim of this study was to elucidate how the 2D layout of items in 3D images impacts visual search and distribution of maintaining attention based on the analysis of the viewer’s gaze. Participants were searching for a target which was projected one plane closer to the viewer compared to distractors on a multi-plane display. The 2D layout of items was manipulated by changing the item distance from the center of the display plane from 2° to 8°. As a result, the targets were identified correctly when the items were displayed close to the center of the display plane, however, the number of errors grew with an increase in distance. Moreover, correct responses were given more often when subjects paid more attention to targets compared to other items on the screen. However, a more balanced distribution of attention over time across all items was characteristic of the incorrectly completed trials. Thus, our results suggest that items should be displayed close to each other in a 2D layout to facilitate precise perception of 3D images and considering distribution of attention maintenance based on eye-tracking might be useful in the objective assessment of user experience for novel displays. Bern Open Publishing 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10643048/ /pubmed/37965285 http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.16.1.4 Text en Copyright (©) 2023 Linda Krauze, Mara Delesa-Velina, Tatjana Pladere, Gunta Krumina https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Krauze, Linda
Delesa-Velina, Mara
Pladere, Tatjana
Krumina, Gunta
Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title_full Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title_fullStr Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title_full_unstemmed Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title_short Why 2D layout in 3D images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
title_sort why 2d layout in 3d images matters: evidence from visual search and eyetracking
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37965285
http://dx.doi.org/10.16910/jemr.16.1.4
work_keys_str_mv AT krauzelinda why2dlayoutin3dimagesmattersevidencefromvisualsearchandeyetracking
AT delesavelinamara why2dlayoutin3dimagesmattersevidencefromvisualsearchandeyetracking
AT pladeretatjana why2dlayoutin3dimagesmattersevidencefromvisualsearchandeyetracking
AT kruminagunta why2dlayoutin3dimagesmattersevidencefromvisualsearchandeyetracking