Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Administering anti-osteoporotic agents to patients perioperatively is a widely accepted approach for improving bone fusion rates and reducing the risk of complications. The best anti-osteoporotic agents for spinal fusion surgery remain unclear. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Xiao-Yuan, Chen, Huan-Xiong, Zhao, Zhi-Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969460
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i30.7350
_version_ 1785147072603750400
author He, Xiao-Yuan
Chen, Huan-Xiong
Zhao, Zhi-Rong
author_facet He, Xiao-Yuan
Chen, Huan-Xiong
Zhao, Zhi-Rong
author_sort He, Xiao-Yuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Administering anti-osteoporotic agents to patients perioperatively is a widely accepted approach for improving bone fusion rates and reducing the risk of complications. The best anti-osteoporotic agents for spinal fusion surgery remain unclear. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic agents in spinal fusion surgery via network meta-analysis. METHODS: Searches were conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception to November 2022. Any studies that compared anti-osteoporotic agents vs placebo for spinal fusion surgery were included in this network meta-analysis. Outcomes included fusion rate, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and adverse events. Network meta-analysis was performed by R software with the gemtc package. RESULTS: In total, 13 randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis. Only teriparatide (OR 3.2, 95%CI: 1.4 to 7.8) was more effective than placebo in increasing the fusion rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of teriparatide combined with denosumab was the highest (SUCRA, 90.9%), followed by teriparatide (SUCRA, 74.0%), zoledronic acid (SUCRA, 43.7%), alendronate (SUCRA, 41.1%) and risedronate (SUCRA, 35.0%). Teriparatide (MD -15, 95%CI: -28 to -2.7) and teriparatide combined with denosumab (MD -20, 95%CI: -40 to -0.43) were more effective than placebo in decreasing the ODI. The SUCRA of teriparatide combined with denosumab was highest (SUCRA, 90.8%), followed by teriparatide (SUCRA, 74.5%), alendronate (SURCA, 52.7), risedronate (SURCA, 52.1%), zoledronic acid (SURCA, 24.2%) and placebo (SURCA, 5.6%) for ODI. The adverse events were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis suggests that teriparatide combined with denosumab and teriparatide alone significantly increase the fusion rate and decrease the ODI without increasing adverse events. Based on current evidence, teriparatide combined with denosumab or teriparatide alone is recommended to increase the fusion rate and to reduce ODI in spinal fusion patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106430612023-11-15 Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis He, Xiao-Yuan Chen, Huan-Xiong Zhao, Zhi-Rong World J Clin Cases Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Administering anti-osteoporotic agents to patients perioperatively is a widely accepted approach for improving bone fusion rates and reducing the risk of complications. The best anti-osteoporotic agents for spinal fusion surgery remain unclear. AIM: To investigate the efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic agents in spinal fusion surgery via network meta-analysis. METHODS: Searches were conducted in four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from inception to November 2022. Any studies that compared anti-osteoporotic agents vs placebo for spinal fusion surgery were included in this network meta-analysis. Outcomes included fusion rate, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and adverse events. Network meta-analysis was performed by R software with the gemtc package. RESULTS: In total, 13 randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta-analysis. Only teriparatide (OR 3.2, 95%CI: 1.4 to 7.8) was more effective than placebo in increasing the fusion rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of teriparatide combined with denosumab was the highest (SUCRA, 90.9%), followed by teriparatide (SUCRA, 74.0%), zoledronic acid (SUCRA, 43.7%), alendronate (SUCRA, 41.1%) and risedronate (SUCRA, 35.0%). Teriparatide (MD -15, 95%CI: -28 to -2.7) and teriparatide combined with denosumab (MD -20, 95%CI: -40 to -0.43) were more effective than placebo in decreasing the ODI. The SUCRA of teriparatide combined with denosumab was highest (SUCRA, 90.8%), followed by teriparatide (SUCRA, 74.5%), alendronate (SURCA, 52.7), risedronate (SURCA, 52.1%), zoledronic acid (SURCA, 24.2%) and placebo (SURCA, 5.6%) for ODI. The adverse events were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis suggests that teriparatide combined with denosumab and teriparatide alone significantly increase the fusion rate and decrease the ODI without increasing adverse events. Based on current evidence, teriparatide combined with denosumab or teriparatide alone is recommended to increase the fusion rate and to reduce ODI in spinal fusion patients. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-26 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10643061/ /pubmed/37969460 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i30.7350 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
He, Xiao-Yuan
Chen, Huan-Xiong
Zhao, Zhi-Rong
Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: A network meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of different anti-osteoporotic drugs for the spinal fusion surgery: a network meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969460
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i30.7350
work_keys_str_mv AT hexiaoyuan efficacyandsafetyofdifferentantiosteoporoticdrugsforthespinalfusionsurgeryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT chenhuanxiong efficacyandsafetyofdifferentantiosteoporoticdrugsforthespinalfusionsurgeryanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaozhirong efficacyandsafetyofdifferentantiosteoporoticdrugsforthespinalfusionsurgeryanetworkmetaanalysis