Cargando…
Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking
BACKGROUND: Sperm banking refers to the collection and storage of sperm cells for future use. Despite the recommendations of major medical societies, sperm banking is not discussed sufficiently with patients at risk of future fertility. Majority of Americans utilize the internet regarding health inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969777 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-120 |
_version_ | 1785147104047398912 |
---|---|
author | Kianian, Reza Belarmino, Andre Finkelshtein, Ilana Mills, Jesse N. Eleswarapu, Sriram V. Donin, Nicholas M. |
author_facet | Kianian, Reza Belarmino, Andre Finkelshtein, Ilana Mills, Jesse N. Eleswarapu, Sriram V. Donin, Nicholas M. |
author_sort | Kianian, Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sperm banking refers to the collection and storage of sperm cells for future use. Despite the recommendations of major medical societies, sperm banking is not discussed sufficiently with patients at risk of future fertility. Majority of Americans utilize the internet regarding health information. The aim of this study is to assess the reading level and the quality of online health information on sperm banking. METHODS: The top 50 search results from Google, Bing, and Yahoo were selected after searching for the term “sperm banking”. Duplicate pages, advertisements, news and magazines, blog posts, videos, paid subscriptions, articles intended for health professionals, and non-related pages were excluded. Four validated readability and two quality assessment tools were used to score the text. Websites were divided into five categories: academic, hospital-affiliated, commercial, non-profit health advocacy, and non-categorized. Descriptive statistics, one sample t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Forty-one webpages were included. The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) for all pages was 46.9/100 and the mean reading level was 11th grade, compared to the recommended 6th grade level, across various assessment tools. Utilizing the DISCERN Instrument, quality of online health information was fair. Seven percent of pages received a “good” quality score and no pages received a score of “excellent”. On average, 1.5 out of 4 criteria categorized by the JAMA Benchmark, a validated quality assessment tool, were met. The hospital-affiliated webpages received the best reading scores and commercial pages received the highest quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: Online health information on sperm banking available in English is of poor quality based on several quality assessment tools and at a reading level significantly higher than what is recommended. Further efforts are needed by providers and healthcare institutions to improve the quality of information available to patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10643385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106433852023-11-15 Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking Kianian, Reza Belarmino, Andre Finkelshtein, Ilana Mills, Jesse N. Eleswarapu, Sriram V. Donin, Nicholas M. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Sperm banking refers to the collection and storage of sperm cells for future use. Despite the recommendations of major medical societies, sperm banking is not discussed sufficiently with patients at risk of future fertility. Majority of Americans utilize the internet regarding health information. The aim of this study is to assess the reading level and the quality of online health information on sperm banking. METHODS: The top 50 search results from Google, Bing, and Yahoo were selected after searching for the term “sperm banking”. Duplicate pages, advertisements, news and magazines, blog posts, videos, paid subscriptions, articles intended for health professionals, and non-related pages were excluded. Four validated readability and two quality assessment tools were used to score the text. Websites were divided into five categories: academic, hospital-affiliated, commercial, non-profit health advocacy, and non-categorized. Descriptive statistics, one sample t-test, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Forty-one webpages were included. The mean Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) for all pages was 46.9/100 and the mean reading level was 11th grade, compared to the recommended 6th grade level, across various assessment tools. Utilizing the DISCERN Instrument, quality of online health information was fair. Seven percent of pages received a “good” quality score and no pages received a score of “excellent”. On average, 1.5 out of 4 criteria categorized by the JAMA Benchmark, a validated quality assessment tool, were met. The hospital-affiliated webpages received the best reading scores and commercial pages received the highest quality scores. CONCLUSIONS: Online health information on sperm banking available in English is of poor quality based on several quality assessment tools and at a reading level significantly higher than what is recommended. Further efforts are needed by providers and healthcare institutions to improve the quality of information available to patients. AME Publishing Company 2023-09-14 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10643385/ /pubmed/37969777 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-120 Text en 2023 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kianian, Reza Belarmino, Andre Finkelshtein, Ilana Mills, Jesse N. Eleswarapu, Sriram V. Donin, Nicholas M. Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title | Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title_full | Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title_fullStr | Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title_full_unstemmed | Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title_short | Should I freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
title_sort | should i freeze my sperm?—readability and quality of health resources for sperm banking |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969777 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-23-120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kianianreza shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking AT belarminoandre shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking AT finkelshteinilana shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking AT millsjessen shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking AT eleswarapusriramv shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking AT doninnicholasm shouldifreezemyspermreadabilityandqualityofhealthresourcesforspermbanking |