Cargando…

Correlations in sleeping patterns and circadian preference between spouses

Spouses may affect each other’s sleeping behaviour. In 47,420 spouse-pairs from the UK Biobank, we found a weak positive phenotypic correlation between spouses for self-reported sleep duration (r = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.12) and a weak inverse correlation for chronotype (diurnal preference) (r = −0....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richmond, Rebecca C., Howe, Laurence J., Heilbron, Karl, Jones, Samuel, Liu, Junxi, Wang, Xin, Weedon, Michael N., Rutter, Martin K., Lawlor, Deborah A., Davey Smith, George, Vetter, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-023-05521-7
Descripción
Sumario:Spouses may affect each other’s sleeping behaviour. In 47,420 spouse-pairs from the UK Biobank, we found a weak positive phenotypic correlation between spouses for self-reported sleep duration (r = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.12) and a weak inverse correlation for chronotype (diurnal preference) (r = −0.11; −0.12, −0.10), which replicated in up to 127,035 23andMe spouse-pairs. Using accelerometer data on 3454 UK Biobank spouse-pairs, the correlation for derived sleep duration was similar to self-report (r = 0.12; 0.09, 0.15). Timing of diurnal activity was positively correlated (r = 0.24; 0.21, 0.27) in contrast to the inverse correlation for chronotype. In Mendelian randomization analysis, positive effects of sleep duration (mean difference=0.13; 0.04, 0.23 SD per SD) and diurnal activity (0.49; 0.03, 0.94) were observed, as were inverse effects of chronotype (−0.15; −0.26, −0.04) and snoring (−0.15; −0.27, −0.04). Findings support the notion that an individual’s sleep may impact that of their partner, promoting opportunities for sleep interventions at the family-level.