Cargando…

Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor

OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Triguero-Cueva, Lucía, Marín-Romero, Bartolomé, Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier, Pérez-Navarro, María José, Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin, Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo, Katati, Majed Jouma, Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592
_version_ 1785134368993312768
author Triguero-Cueva, Lucía
Marín-Romero, Bartolomé
Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier
Pérez-Navarro, María José
Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin
Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo
Katati, Majed Jouma
Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco
author_facet Triguero-Cueva, Lucía
Marín-Romero, Bartolomé
Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier
Pérez-Navarro, María José
Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin
Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo
Katati, Majed Jouma
Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco
author_sort Triguero-Cueva, Lucía
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population. In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets. METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target). CONCLUSION: Evidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106435332023-10-30 Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor Triguero-Cueva, Lucía Marín-Romero, Bartolomé Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier Pérez-Navarro, María José Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo Katati, Majed Jouma Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population. In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets. METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target). CONCLUSION: Evidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10643533/ /pubmed/38020655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592 Text en Copyright © 2023 Triguero-Cueva, Marín-Romero, Madrid-Navarro, Pérez-Navarro, Iáñez-Velasco, Mínguez-Castellanos, Katati and Escamilla-Sevilla. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Triguero-Cueva, Lucía
Marín-Romero, Bartolomé
Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier
Pérez-Navarro, María José
Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin
Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo
Katati, Majed Jouma
Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco
Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_full Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_fullStr Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_full_unstemmed Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_short Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
title_sort neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020655
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592
work_keys_str_mv AT triguerocuevalucia neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT marinromerobartolome neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT madridnavarrocarlosjavier neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT pereznavarromariajose neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT ianezvelascobenjamin neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT minguezcastellanosadolfo neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT katatimajedjouma neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor
AT escamillasevillafrancisco neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor