Cargando…
Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor
OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592 |
_version_ | 1785134368993312768 |
---|---|
author | Triguero-Cueva, Lucía Marín-Romero, Bartolomé Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier Pérez-Navarro, María José Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo Katati, Majed Jouma Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco |
author_facet | Triguero-Cueva, Lucía Marín-Romero, Bartolomé Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier Pérez-Navarro, María José Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo Katati, Majed Jouma Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco |
author_sort | Triguero-Cueva, Lucía |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population. In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets. METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target). CONCLUSION: Evidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10643533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106435332023-10-30 Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor Triguero-Cueva, Lucía Marín-Romero, Bartolomé Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier Pérez-Navarro, María José Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo Katati, Majed Jouma Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco Front Neurol Neurology OBJECTIVE: Patients with essential tremor (ET) may experience cognitive-affective impairment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets, such as the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus or the posterior subthalamic area (PSA), has been shown to be beneficial for refractory ET. However, there is little evidence regarding the possible neuropsychological effects of PSA-DBS on patients with ET, and there are few studies comparing it with VIM-DBS in this population. In this study, we aim to present the evaluation protocol and neuropsychological battery as used in an ongoing trial of DBS for ET comparing the already mentioned targets. METHODS: As part of a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of PSA-DBS vs. VIM-DBS, 11 patients with refractory ET will undergo a multi-domain neuropsychological battery assessment. This will include a pre−/post-implantation assessment (3 months after the stimulation of each target and 6 months after an open stage of DBS on the most optimal target). CONCLUSION: Evidence on the neuropsychological effects of DBS in patients with refractory ET is very scarce, particularly in lesser-explored targets such as PSA. This study could contribute significantly in this field, particularly on pre-procedure safety analysis for tailored patient/technique selection, and to complete the safety analysis of the procedure. Moreover, if proven useful, this proposed neuropsychological assessment protocol could be extensible to other surgical therapies for ET. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10643533/ /pubmed/38020655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592 Text en Copyright © 2023 Triguero-Cueva, Marín-Romero, Madrid-Navarro, Pérez-Navarro, Iáñez-Velasco, Mínguez-Castellanos, Katati and Escamilla-Sevilla. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Triguero-Cueva, Lucía Marín-Romero, Bartolomé Madrid-Navarro, Carlos Javier Pérez-Navarro, María José Iáñez-Velasco, Benjamin Mínguez-Castellanos, Adolfo Katati, Majed Jouma Escamilla-Sevilla, Francisco Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title | Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title_full | Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title_fullStr | Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title_short | Neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
title_sort | neuropsychological assessment protocol in an ongoing randomized controlled trial on posterior subthalamic area vs. ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for essential tremor |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38020655 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1222592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT triguerocuevalucia neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT marinromerobartolome neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT madridnavarrocarlosjavier neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT pereznavarromariajose neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT ianezvelascobenjamin neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT minguezcastellanosadolfo neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT katatimajedjouma neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor AT escamillasevillafrancisco neuropsychologicalassessmentprotocolinanongoingrandomizedcontrolledtrialonposteriorsubthalamicareavsventralintermediatenucleusdeepbrainstimulationforessentialtremor |