Cargando…

Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation

Thermal Power Plant generates FGD gypsum as by-product during coal combustion. This study evaluates the characterization (spectroscopic and elemental), potentially toxic elements (PTEs) distribution, and environmental risk assessment of FGD gypsum for safe and sustainable use in agriculture. The XRD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundha, Parul, Mukhopadhyay, Raj, Basak, Nirmalendu, Rai, Arvind Kumar, Bedwal, Sandeep, Patel, Subedar, Kumar, Sanjay, Kaur, Harshpreet, Chandra, Priyanka, Sharma, Parbodh Chander, Saxena, Sanjeev Kumar, Parihar, Somendra Singh, Yadav, Rajender Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45706-y
_version_ 1785147147659771904
author Sundha, Parul
Mukhopadhyay, Raj
Basak, Nirmalendu
Rai, Arvind Kumar
Bedwal, Sandeep
Patel, Subedar
Kumar, Sanjay
Kaur, Harshpreet
Chandra, Priyanka
Sharma, Parbodh Chander
Saxena, Sanjeev Kumar
Parihar, Somendra Singh
Yadav, Rajender Kumar
author_facet Sundha, Parul
Mukhopadhyay, Raj
Basak, Nirmalendu
Rai, Arvind Kumar
Bedwal, Sandeep
Patel, Subedar
Kumar, Sanjay
Kaur, Harshpreet
Chandra, Priyanka
Sharma, Parbodh Chander
Saxena, Sanjeev Kumar
Parihar, Somendra Singh
Yadav, Rajender Kumar
author_sort Sundha, Parul
collection PubMed
description Thermal Power Plant generates FGD gypsum as by-product during coal combustion. This study evaluates the characterization (spectroscopic and elemental), potentially toxic elements (PTEs) distribution, and environmental risk assessment of FGD gypsum for safe and sustainable use in agriculture. The XRD and SEM analysis confirmed the dominance of crystalline CaSO(4)·2H(2)O in FGD gypsum. The order of concentrations of PTEs in FGD gypsum was Fe > Al > Mn > Zn > Ni > Co. The residual fraction was the dominant pool, sharing 80–90% of the total PTEs. The heavy metals (HMs) were below the toxic range in the leachates. The Co, Ni, Al, Fe Mn, Zn had low (< 10%) risk assessment code and the ecotoxicity was in the range of 0.0–7.46%. The contamination factor was also low (0.0–0.16) at the normal recommended doses of FGD gypsum application for sodicity reclamation. The enrichment factor was in the order of Al < Mn < Co < Zn < Ni. Mn [enrichment factor (E(f)) 1.2–2.0] and Co (E(f) 1.7–2.8) showed negligible enrichment of metals, whereas Ni (E(f) 4.3–5.2) and Zn (E(f) 4.5–5.6) reported moderate accumulation in soil. The application of FGD gypsum @ 10 t ha(−1) for sodicity reclamation will develop a geo-accumulation index below the critical values indicating its safe and sustainable use to achieve land degradation neutrality (LDN) and UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106436642023-11-13 Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation Sundha, Parul Mukhopadhyay, Raj Basak, Nirmalendu Rai, Arvind Kumar Bedwal, Sandeep Patel, Subedar Kumar, Sanjay Kaur, Harshpreet Chandra, Priyanka Sharma, Parbodh Chander Saxena, Sanjeev Kumar Parihar, Somendra Singh Yadav, Rajender Kumar Sci Rep Article Thermal Power Plant generates FGD gypsum as by-product during coal combustion. This study evaluates the characterization (spectroscopic and elemental), potentially toxic elements (PTEs) distribution, and environmental risk assessment of FGD gypsum for safe and sustainable use in agriculture. The XRD and SEM analysis confirmed the dominance of crystalline CaSO(4)·2H(2)O in FGD gypsum. The order of concentrations of PTEs in FGD gypsum was Fe > Al > Mn > Zn > Ni > Co. The residual fraction was the dominant pool, sharing 80–90% of the total PTEs. The heavy metals (HMs) were below the toxic range in the leachates. The Co, Ni, Al, Fe Mn, Zn had low (< 10%) risk assessment code and the ecotoxicity was in the range of 0.0–7.46%. The contamination factor was also low (0.0–0.16) at the normal recommended doses of FGD gypsum application for sodicity reclamation. The enrichment factor was in the order of Al < Mn < Co < Zn < Ni. Mn [enrichment factor (E(f)) 1.2–2.0] and Co (E(f) 1.7–2.8) showed negligible enrichment of metals, whereas Ni (E(f) 4.3–5.2) and Zn (E(f) 4.5–5.6) reported moderate accumulation in soil. The application of FGD gypsum @ 10 t ha(−1) for sodicity reclamation will develop a geo-accumulation index below the critical values indicating its safe and sustainable use to achieve land degradation neutrality (LDN) and UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10643664/ /pubmed/37957182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45706-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sundha, Parul
Mukhopadhyay, Raj
Basak, Nirmalendu
Rai, Arvind Kumar
Bedwal, Sandeep
Patel, Subedar
Kumar, Sanjay
Kaur, Harshpreet
Chandra, Priyanka
Sharma, Parbodh Chander
Saxena, Sanjeev Kumar
Parihar, Somendra Singh
Yadav, Rajender Kumar
Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title_full Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title_fullStr Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title_short Characterization of flue gas desulphurized (FGD) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
title_sort characterization of flue gas desulphurized (fgd) gypsum of a coal-fired plant and its relevant risk of associated potential toxic elements in sodic soil reclamation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37957182
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45706-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sundhaparul characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT mukhopadhyayraj characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT basaknirmalendu characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT raiarvindkumar characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT bedwalsandeep characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT patelsubedar characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT kumarsanjay characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT kaurharshpreet characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT chandrapriyanka characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT sharmaparbodhchander characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT saxenasanjeevkumar characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT pariharsomendrasingh characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation
AT yadavrajenderkumar characterizationoffluegasdesulphurizedfgdgypsumofacoalfiredplantanditsrelevantriskofassociatedpotentialtoxicelementsinsodicsoilreclamation