Cargando…
Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000 |
_version_ | 1785134411023384576 |
---|---|
author | Vaish, Richa Mahajan, Abhishek Sable, Nilesh Dusane, Rohit Deshmukh, Anuja Bal, Munita D’cruz, Anil K. |
author_facet | Vaish, Richa Mahajan, Abhishek Sable, Nilesh Dusane, Rohit Deshmukh, Anuja Bal, Munita D’cruz, Anil K. |
author_sort | Vaish, Richa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 314 nodal levels were analyzed in 43 patients with CT, and US; evaluations were done between January 2013 and November 2015. The images were reviewed by two radiologists independently who were blinded to histopathological outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of US, CT, and US + CT were calculated using histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for US, CT, and US + CT were 53.9%, 88.8%, 74.1%, and 76.4%; 81.2%, 68.0%, 60.1%, and 85.9%; and 84.6%, 66.0%, 59.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the US was 75.80%, the CT scan was 72.93%, and the US + CT scan was 72.93%. For the lateral compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 56.6%, 91.4%, 77.1%, and 80.5%; 80.7%, 70.6%, 58.3%, and 87.8%; and 84.3%, 68.7%, 57.9%, and 89.6%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 79.67%, the CT scan was 73.98%, and the US + CT scan was 73.98% for the lateral compartment. For the central compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 47.1%, 76.5%, 66.7%, and 59.1%; 82.4%, 55.9%, 65.1%, and 76.0%; and 85.3%, 52.9%, 64.4%, and 78.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 61.76%, the CT scan was 69.12%, and the US + CT scan was 69.12% for the central compartment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CT has higher sensitivity in detecting nodal metastasis; however, its role is complementary to US due to low specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10643764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106437642023-10-31 Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer Vaish, Richa Mahajan, Abhishek Sable, Nilesh Dusane, Rohit Deshmukh, Anuja Bal, Munita D’cruz, Anil K. Front Radiol Radiology BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 314 nodal levels were analyzed in 43 patients with CT, and US; evaluations were done between January 2013 and November 2015. The images were reviewed by two radiologists independently who were blinded to histopathological outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of US, CT, and US + CT were calculated using histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for US, CT, and US + CT were 53.9%, 88.8%, 74.1%, and 76.4%; 81.2%, 68.0%, 60.1%, and 85.9%; and 84.6%, 66.0%, 59.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the US was 75.80%, the CT scan was 72.93%, and the US + CT scan was 72.93%. For the lateral compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 56.6%, 91.4%, 77.1%, and 80.5%; 80.7%, 70.6%, 58.3%, and 87.8%; and 84.3%, 68.7%, 57.9%, and 89.6%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 79.67%, the CT scan was 73.98%, and the US + CT scan was 73.98% for the lateral compartment. For the central compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 47.1%, 76.5%, 66.7%, and 59.1%; 82.4%, 55.9%, 65.1%, and 76.0%; and 85.3%, 52.9%, 64.4%, and 78.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 61.76%, the CT scan was 69.12%, and the US + CT scan was 69.12% for the central compartment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CT has higher sensitivity in detecting nodal metastasis; however, its role is complementary to US due to low specificity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10643764/ /pubmed/38022790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000 Text en © 2023 Vaish, Mahajan, Sable, Dusane, Deshmukh, Bal and D'cruz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Radiology Vaish, Richa Mahajan, Abhishek Sable, Nilesh Dusane, Rohit Deshmukh, Anuja Bal, Munita D’cruz, Anil K. Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title | Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title_full | Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title_fullStr | Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title_short | Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
title_sort | role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer |
topic | Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaishricha roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT mahajanabhishek roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT sablenilesh roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT dusanerohit roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT deshmukhanuja roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT balmunita roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer AT dcruzanilk roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer |