Cargando…

Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaish, Richa, Mahajan, Abhishek, Sable, Nilesh, Dusane, Rohit, Deshmukh, Anuja, Bal, Munita, D’cruz, Anil K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000
_version_ 1785134411023384576
author Vaish, Richa
Mahajan, Abhishek
Sable, Nilesh
Dusane, Rohit
Deshmukh, Anuja
Bal, Munita
D’cruz, Anil K.
author_facet Vaish, Richa
Mahajan, Abhishek
Sable, Nilesh
Dusane, Rohit
Deshmukh, Anuja
Bal, Munita
D’cruz, Anil K.
author_sort Vaish, Richa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 314 nodal levels were analyzed in 43 patients with CT, and US; evaluations were done between January 2013 and November 2015. The images were reviewed by two radiologists independently who were blinded to histopathological outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of US, CT, and US + CT were calculated using histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for US, CT, and US + CT were 53.9%, 88.8%, 74.1%, and 76.4%; 81.2%, 68.0%, 60.1%, and 85.9%; and 84.6%, 66.0%, 59.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the US was 75.80%, the CT scan was 72.93%, and the US + CT scan was 72.93%. For the lateral compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 56.6%, 91.4%, 77.1%, and 80.5%; 80.7%, 70.6%, 58.3%, and 87.8%; and 84.3%, 68.7%, 57.9%, and 89.6%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 79.67%, the CT scan was 73.98%, and the US + CT scan was 73.98% for the lateral compartment. For the central compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 47.1%, 76.5%, 66.7%, and 59.1%; 82.4%, 55.9%, 65.1%, and 76.0%; and 85.3%, 52.9%, 64.4%, and 78.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 61.76%, the CT scan was 69.12%, and the US + CT scan was 69.12% for the central compartment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CT has higher sensitivity in detecting nodal metastasis; however, its role is complementary to US due to low specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106437642023-10-31 Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer Vaish, Richa Mahajan, Abhishek Sable, Nilesh Dusane, Rohit Deshmukh, Anuja Bal, Munita D’cruz, Anil K. Front Radiol Radiology BACKGROUND: Accurate neck staging is essential for performing appropriate surgery and avoiding undue morbidity in thyroid cancer. The modality of choice for evaluation is ultrasonography (US), which has limitations, particularly in the central compartment, that can be overcome by adding a computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 314 nodal levels were analyzed in 43 patients with CT, and US; evaluations were done between January 2013 and November 2015. The images were reviewed by two radiologists independently who were blinded to histopathological outcomes. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of US, CT, and US + CT were calculated using histology as the gold standard. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for US, CT, and US + CT were 53.9%, 88.8%, 74.1%, and 76.4%; 81.2%, 68.0%, 60.1%, and 85.9%; and 84.6%, 66.0%, 59.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy of the US was 75.80%, the CT scan was 72.93%, and the US + CT scan was 72.93%. For the lateral compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 56.6%, 91.4%, 77.1%, and 80.5%; 80.7%, 70.6%, 58.3%, and 87.8%; and 84.3%, 68.7%, 57.9%, and 89.6%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 79.67%, the CT scan was 73.98%, and the US + CT scan was 73.98% for the lateral compartment. For the central compartment, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the US, CT, and US + CT were 47.1%, 76.5%, 66.7%, and 59.1%; 82.4%, 55.9%, 65.1%, and 76.0%; and 85.3%, 52.9%, 64.4%, and 78.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the US was 61.76%, the CT scan was 69.12%, and the US + CT scan was 69.12% for the central compartment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that CT has higher sensitivity in detecting nodal metastasis; however, its role is complementary to US due to low specificity. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10643764/ /pubmed/38022790 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000 Text en © 2023 Vaish, Mahajan, Sable, Dusane, Deshmukh, Bal and D'cruz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Radiology
Vaish, Richa
Mahajan, Abhishek
Sable, Nilesh
Dusane, Rohit
Deshmukh, Anuja
Bal, Munita
D’cruz, Anil K.
Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title_full Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title_fullStr Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title_full_unstemmed Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title_short Role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
title_sort role of computed tomography in the evaluation of regional metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid cancer
topic Radiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38022790
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fradi.2023.1243000
work_keys_str_mv AT vaishricha roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT mahajanabhishek roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT sablenilesh roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT dusanerohit roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT deshmukhanuja roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT balmunita roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer
AT dcruzanilk roleofcomputedtomographyintheevaluationofregionalmetastasisinwelldifferentiatedthyroidcancer