Cargando…

Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital

AIMS: To translate and validate the Publication Pressure Questionnaire‐revised (PPQ‐r) among the Chinese nurses. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional descriptive study. METHODS: The classical forward/backward translation of the PPQ‐r was conducted first, and then the psychometric values were tested using the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xi, Xinxue, Mao, Jing, Zeng, Tieying, Ju, Dandan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2012
_version_ 1785147169552990208
author Xi, Xinxue
Mao, Jing
Zeng, Tieying
Ju, Dandan
author_facet Xi, Xinxue
Mao, Jing
Zeng, Tieying
Ju, Dandan
author_sort Xi, Xinxue
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To translate and validate the Publication Pressure Questionnaire‐revised (PPQ‐r) among the Chinese nurses. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional descriptive study. METHODS: The classical forward/backward translation of the PPQ‐r was conducted first, and then the psychometric values were tested using the data collected in September, 2021 among 924 Chinese nurses from a university hospital in China by calculating its content validity index, construct validity, both convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency reliability following the COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS: The proposed three‐factor structure of original PPQ‐r cannot be confirmed in present study. With exploratory factor analysis, a new two‐factor structure with 9 items was extracted, accounting for 62.718% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated satisfactory goodness of all fit index values: χ (2) = 75.53; df = 23; χ (2)/df = 3.28; CFI = 0.973; TLI = 0.958; RMSEA = 0.07 and SRMR = 0.047. Both sub‐scales yielded good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha being 0.845 and 0.876, respectively. The Chinese version of PPQ‐r could be accepted as a reliable and valid tool to measure the Chinese nurses' publication pressure. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participation of nurses in this study was limited to the data provided through participant survey.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10643837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106438372023-11-15 Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital Xi, Xinxue Mao, Jing Zeng, Tieying Ju, Dandan Nurs Open Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology AIMS: To translate and validate the Publication Pressure Questionnaire‐revised (PPQ‐r) among the Chinese nurses. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional descriptive study. METHODS: The classical forward/backward translation of the PPQ‐r was conducted first, and then the psychometric values were tested using the data collected in September, 2021 among 924 Chinese nurses from a university hospital in China by calculating its content validity index, construct validity, both convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency reliability following the COSMIN guidelines. RESULTS: The proposed three‐factor structure of original PPQ‐r cannot be confirmed in present study. With exploratory factor analysis, a new two‐factor structure with 9 items was extracted, accounting for 62.718% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated satisfactory goodness of all fit index values: χ (2) = 75.53; df = 23; χ (2)/df = 3.28; CFI = 0.973; TLI = 0.958; RMSEA = 0.07 and SRMR = 0.047. Both sub‐scales yielded good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha being 0.845 and 0.876, respectively. The Chinese version of PPQ‐r could be accepted as a reliable and valid tool to measure the Chinese nurses' publication pressure. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Participation of nurses in this study was limited to the data provided through participant survey. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10643837/ /pubmed/37775963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2012 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology
Xi, Xinxue
Mao, Jing
Zeng, Tieying
Ju, Dandan
Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title_full Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title_fullStr Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title_full_unstemmed Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title_short Validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into Chinese nurses from a university hospital
title_sort validation of publication pressure questionnaire‐revised into chinese nurses from a university hospital
topic Research Methodology: Discussion Paper ‐ Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37775963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2012
work_keys_str_mv AT xixinxue validationofpublicationpressurequestionnairerevisedintochinesenursesfromauniversityhospital
AT maojing validationofpublicationpressurequestionnairerevisedintochinesenursesfromauniversityhospital
AT zengtieying validationofpublicationpressurequestionnairerevisedintochinesenursesfromauniversityhospital
AT judandan validationofpublicationpressurequestionnairerevisedintochinesenursesfromauniversityhospital