Cargando…

Ubenimex suppresses glycolysis mediated by CD13/Hedgehog signaling to enhance the effect of cisplatin in liver cancer

BACKGROUND: Liver cancer ranks third in fatalities among all cancer-related deaths. As a traditional chemotherapy drug, the application of cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin, CDDP) for the treatment of liver cancer is greatly limited by its side effects and high drug resistance. Therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Yunyan, Guo, Qie, Jing, Fanjing, Shang, Xiuling, Zhou, Changkai, Jing, Fanbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10643970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969369
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-435
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Liver cancer ranks third in fatalities among all cancer-related deaths. As a traditional chemotherapy drug, the application of cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (cisplatin, CDDP) for the treatment of liver cancer is greatly limited by its side effects and high drug resistance. Therefore, we are in urgent need of a more effective and less toxic CDDP therapeutic regimen. Our research aimed to clarify the possible mechanism of ubenimex in enhancing the effect of CDDP on liver cancer. METHODS: The underlying mechanism was determined using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay, flow cytometry, immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), transwell assay, wound healing assay and western blot assay. RESULTS: The data indicated that ubenimex suppressed the expression levels of glycolysis-related proteins by decreasing the expression levels of cluster of differentiation 13 (CD13), while overexpression of CD13 could restore the activity of glycolysis. The glycolysis inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose enhanced the antiproliferative effect of ubenimex and CDDP. In addition, the inhibition of the activity levels of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway members was accompanied by a decrease in CD13 expression, which was reversed following CD13 overexpression. Moreover, ubenimex inhibited the production of lactic acid and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), as well as the expression of key proteins involved in glycolysis, which was similar to the effects caused by the Hh inhibitor cyclopamine. However, the effects of ubenimex were mediated by targeting CD13, while cyclopamine exhibited no effects on CD13, suggesting that Hh signaling occurred in the downstream of CD13. The inhibition of glycolysis by cyclopamine was reduced following CD13 overexpression, which further indicated that ubenimex targeted the CD13/Hh pathway to inhibit glycolysis. Finally, wound healing and transwell assays and cell proliferation and apoptosis analysis demonstrated that ubenimex inhibited glycolysis by alleviating the CD13/Hh pathway, which in turn enhanced the effects of CDDP on inhibiting the progression of liver cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Ubenimex inhibits glycolysis by targeting the CD13/Hh pathway, thus playing an anti-tumor role together with CDDP. This study demonstrated the adjuvant effect of ubenimex from the perspective of Hh signal-dependent glycolysis regulation.