Cargando…

The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction

BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazıcı, Hilmi, Uğurlu, Onur, Aygül, Yeşim, Yıldırım, Mehmet, Deniz Uçar, Ahmet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791433
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968
_version_ 1785147195346911232
author Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uğurlu, Onur
Aygül, Yeşim
Yıldırım, Mehmet
Deniz Uçar, Ahmet
author_facet Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uğurlu, Onur
Aygül, Yeşim
Yıldırım, Mehmet
Deniz Uçar, Ahmet
author_sort Yazıcı, Hilmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. METHODS: The medical records of patients who had burn injuries treated at Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital’s Burn Treatment Center were examined retrospectively. Patients’ demographics such as age and gender, total burned surface area (TBSA), Inhalation injury (II), full-thickness burns (FTBSA), and burn types (BT) were recorded and used as input features in ML models. Patients were analyzed under two groups: Survivors and Non-Survivors. Six ML algorithms, including k-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and AdaBoost (AB), were used for predicting mortality. Several different input feature combinations were evaluated for each algorithm. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 363. All six parameters (TBSA, Gender, FTBSA, II, Age, BT) that were included in ML algorithms showed a significant difference (p<0.001). The results show that AB algorithm using all input features had the best prediction performance with an accuracy of 90% and an area under the curve of 92%. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms showed strong predictive performance in burn mortality. The development of an ML algorithm with the right input features could be useful in the clinical practice. Further investigations are needed on this topic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106440772023-11-15 The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction Yazıcı, Hilmi Uğurlu, Onur Aygül, Yeşim Yıldırım, Mehmet Deniz Uçar, Ahmet Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. METHODS: The medical records of patients who had burn injuries treated at Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital’s Burn Treatment Center were examined retrospectively. Patients’ demographics such as age and gender, total burned surface area (TBSA), Inhalation injury (II), full-thickness burns (FTBSA), and burn types (BT) were recorded and used as input features in ML models. Patients were analyzed under two groups: Survivors and Non-Survivors. Six ML algorithms, including k-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and AdaBoost (AB), were used for predicting mortality. Several different input feature combinations were evaluated for each algorithm. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 363. All six parameters (TBSA, Gender, FTBSA, II, Age, BT) that were included in ML algorithms showed a significant difference (p<0.001). The results show that AB algorithm using all input features had the best prediction performance with an accuracy of 90% and an area under the curve of 92%. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms showed strong predictive performance in burn mortality. The development of an ML algorithm with the right input features could be useful in the clinical practice. Further investigations are needed on this topic. Kare Publishing 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10644077/ /pubmed/37791433 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Yazıcı, Hilmi
Uğurlu, Onur
Aygül, Yeşim
Yıldırım, Mehmet
Deniz Uçar, Ahmet
The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title_full The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title_fullStr The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title_full_unstemmed The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title_short The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
title_sort effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791433
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968
work_keys_str_mv AT yazıcıhilmi theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT ugurluonur theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT aygulyesim theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT yıldırımmehmet theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT denizucarahmet theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT yazıcıhilmi effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT ugurluonur effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT aygulyesim effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT yıldırımmehmet effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction
AT denizucarahmet effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction