Cargando…
The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction
BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791433 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968 |
_version_ | 1785147195346911232 |
---|---|
author | Yazıcı, Hilmi Uğurlu, Onur Aygül, Yeşim Yıldırım, Mehmet Deniz Uçar, Ahmet |
author_facet | Yazıcı, Hilmi Uğurlu, Onur Aygül, Yeşim Yıldırım, Mehmet Deniz Uçar, Ahmet |
author_sort | Yazıcı, Hilmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. METHODS: The medical records of patients who had burn injuries treated at Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital’s Burn Treatment Center were examined retrospectively. Patients’ demographics such as age and gender, total burned surface area (TBSA), Inhalation injury (II), full-thickness burns (FTBSA), and burn types (BT) were recorded and used as input features in ML models. Patients were analyzed under two groups: Survivors and Non-Survivors. Six ML algorithms, including k-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and AdaBoost (AB), were used for predicting mortality. Several different input feature combinations were evaluated for each algorithm. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 363. All six parameters (TBSA, Gender, FTBSA, II, Age, BT) that were included in ML algorithms showed a significant difference (p<0.001). The results show that AB algorithm using all input features had the best prediction performance with an accuracy of 90% and an area under the curve of 92%. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms showed strong predictive performance in burn mortality. The development of an ML algorithm with the right input features could be useful in the clinical practice. Further investigations are needed on this topic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106440772023-11-15 The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction Yazıcı, Hilmi Uğurlu, Onur Aygül, Yeşim Yıldırım, Mehmet Deniz Uçar, Ahmet Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Burns is one of the most common traumas worldwide. Severely injured burn patients have an increased risk for mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate well-known risk factors for burn mortality and comparison of six machine learning (ML) Algorithms’ predictive performances. METHODS: The medical records of patients who had burn injuries treated at Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital’s Burn Treatment Center were examined retrospectively. Patients’ demographics such as age and gender, total burned surface area (TBSA), Inhalation injury (II), full-thickness burns (FTBSA), and burn types (BT) were recorded and used as input features in ML models. Patients were analyzed under two groups: Survivors and Non-Survivors. Six ML algorithms, including k-Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and AdaBoost (AB), were used for predicting mortality. Several different input feature combinations were evaluated for each algorithm. RESULTS: The number of eligible patients was 363. All six parameters (TBSA, Gender, FTBSA, II, Age, BT) that were included in ML algorithms showed a significant difference (p<0.001). The results show that AB algorithm using all input features had the best prediction performance with an accuracy of 90% and an area under the curve of 92%. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms showed strong predictive performance in burn mortality. The development of an ML algorithm with the right input features could be useful in the clinical practice. Further investigations are needed on this topic. Kare Publishing 2023-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10644077/ /pubmed/37791433 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yazıcı, Hilmi Uğurlu, Onur Aygül, Yeşim Yıldırım, Mehmet Deniz Uçar, Ahmet The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title | The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title_full | The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title_fullStr | The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title_short | The effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
title_sort | effect of well-known burn-related features on machine learning algorithms in burn patients’ mortality prediction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37791433 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2023.79968 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yazıcıhilmi theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT ugurluonur theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT aygulyesim theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT yıldırımmehmet theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT denizucarahmet theeffectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT yazıcıhilmi effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT ugurluonur effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT aygulyesim effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT yıldırımmehmet effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction AT denizucarahmet effectofwellknownburnrelatedfeaturesonmachinelearningalgorithmsinburnpatientsmortalityprediction |