Cargando…
Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques
INTRODUCTION: Machine-assisted topic analysis (MATA) uses artificial intelligence methods to help qualitative researchers analyze large datasets. This is useful for researchers to rapidly update healthcare interventions during changing healthcare contexts, such as a pandemic. We examined the potenti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268223 |
_version_ | 1785134482310823936 |
---|---|
author | Towler, Lauren Bondaronek, Paulina Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni Amlôt, Richard Chadborn, Tim Ainsworth, Ben Yardley, Lucy |
author_facet | Towler, Lauren Bondaronek, Paulina Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni Amlôt, Richard Chadborn, Tim Ainsworth, Ben Yardley, Lucy |
author_sort | Towler, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Machine-assisted topic analysis (MATA) uses artificial intelligence methods to help qualitative researchers analyze large datasets. This is useful for researchers to rapidly update healthcare interventions during changing healthcare contexts, such as a pandemic. We examined the potential to support healthcare interventions by comparing MATA with “human-only” thematic analysis techniques on the same dataset (1,472 user responses from a COVID-19 behavioral intervention). METHODS: In MATA, an unsupervised topic-modeling approach identified latent topics in the text, from which researchers identified broad themes. In human-only codebook analysis, researchers developed an initial codebook based on previous research that was applied to the dataset by the team, who met regularly to discuss and refine the codes. Formal triangulation using a “convergence coding matrix” compared findings between methods, categorizing them as “agreement”, “complementary”, “dissonant”, or “silent”. RESULTS: Human analysis took much longer than MATA (147.5 vs. 40 h). Both methods identified key themes about what users found helpful and unhelpful. Formal triangulation showed both sets of findings were highly similar. The formal triangulation showed high similarity between the findings. All MATA codes were classified as in agreement or complementary to the human themes. When findings differed slightly, this was due to human researcher interpretations or nuance from human-only analysis. DISCUSSION: Results produced by MATA were similar to human-only thematic analysis, with substantial time savings. For simple analyses that do not require an in-depth or subtle understanding of the data, MATA is a useful tool that can support qualitative researchers to interpret and analyze large datasets quickly. This approach can support intervention development and implementation, such as enabling rapid optimization during public health emergencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106441112023-10-31 Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques Towler, Lauren Bondaronek, Paulina Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni Amlôt, Richard Chadborn, Tim Ainsworth, Ben Yardley, Lucy Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Machine-assisted topic analysis (MATA) uses artificial intelligence methods to help qualitative researchers analyze large datasets. This is useful for researchers to rapidly update healthcare interventions during changing healthcare contexts, such as a pandemic. We examined the potential to support healthcare interventions by comparing MATA with “human-only” thematic analysis techniques on the same dataset (1,472 user responses from a COVID-19 behavioral intervention). METHODS: In MATA, an unsupervised topic-modeling approach identified latent topics in the text, from which researchers identified broad themes. In human-only codebook analysis, researchers developed an initial codebook based on previous research that was applied to the dataset by the team, who met regularly to discuss and refine the codes. Formal triangulation using a “convergence coding matrix” compared findings between methods, categorizing them as “agreement”, “complementary”, “dissonant”, or “silent”. RESULTS: Human analysis took much longer than MATA (147.5 vs. 40 h). Both methods identified key themes about what users found helpful and unhelpful. Formal triangulation showed both sets of findings were highly similar. The formal triangulation showed high similarity between the findings. All MATA codes were classified as in agreement or complementary to the human themes. When findings differed slightly, this was due to human researcher interpretations or nuance from human-only analysis. DISCUSSION: Results produced by MATA were similar to human-only thematic analysis, with substantial time savings. For simple analyses that do not require an in-depth or subtle understanding of the data, MATA is a useful tool that can support qualitative researchers to interpret and analyze large datasets quickly. This approach can support intervention development and implementation, such as enabling rapid optimization during public health emergencies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10644111/ /pubmed/38026376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268223 Text en Copyright © 2023 Towler, Bondaronek, Papakonstantinou, Amlôt, Chadborn, Ainsworth and Yardley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Towler, Lauren Bondaronek, Paulina Papakonstantinou, Trisevgeni Amlôt, Richard Chadborn, Tim Ainsworth, Ben Yardley, Lucy Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title | Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title_full | Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title_fullStr | Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title_short | Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
title_sort | applying machine-learning to rapidly analyze large qualitative text datasets to inform the covid-19 pandemic response: comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38026376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT towlerlauren applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT bondaronekpaulina applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT papakonstantinoutrisevgeni applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT amlotrichard applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT chadborntim applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT ainsworthben applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques AT yardleylucy applyingmachinelearningtorapidlyanalyzelargequalitativetextdatasetstoinformthecovid19pandemicresponsecomparinghumanandmachineassistedtopicanalysistechniques |