Cargando…
The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognosti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969626 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513 |
_version_ | 1785147201153925120 |
---|---|
author | Himič, Vratko Syrmos, Nikolaos Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I. Kato, So Fehlings, Michael G. Ganau, Mario |
author_facet | Himič, Vratko Syrmos, Nikolaos Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I. Kato, So Fehlings, Michael G. Ganau, Mario |
author_sort | Himič, Vratko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognostication. OVF have been shown to be more prevalent in Caucasian patient cohorts in comparison to the Eastern Asian population. These population-based differences in risk for developing OVF suggest that there could be genetic and epigenetic factors that drive the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, low bone mineral density (BMD) and OVF. Several genetic loci have been associated with a higher vertebral fracture risk, although at varying degrees of significance. The present challenge is clarifying whether these associations are specific to vertebral fractures or osteoporosis more generally. Furthermore, these factors could be exploited for diagnostic interpretation as biomarkers [including novel long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, micro (mi)RNAs and circular (circ)RNAs]. The extent of methylation of genes, alongside post-translational histone modifications, have shown to affect several interlinked pathways that converge on the regulation of bone deposition and resorption, partially through their influence on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Lastly, in addition to biomarkers, several exciting new imaging modalities could add to the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method used for BMD assessment. New technologies, and novel sequences within existing imaging modalities, may be able to quantify the quality of bone in addition to the BMD and bone structure; these are making progress through various stages of development from the pre-clinical sphere through to deployment in the clinical setting. In this mini review, we explore the literature to clarify the genetic and epigenetic factors associated with spinal fragility fractures and delineate the causal genes, pathways and interactions which could drive different risk profiles. We also outline the cutting-edge imaging modalities which could transform diagnostic protocols for OVF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10644129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106441292023-11-15 The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis Himič, Vratko Syrmos, Nikolaos Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I. Kato, So Fehlings, Michael G. Ganau, Mario Quant Imaging Med Surg Mini-Review Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognostication. OVF have been shown to be more prevalent in Caucasian patient cohorts in comparison to the Eastern Asian population. These population-based differences in risk for developing OVF suggest that there could be genetic and epigenetic factors that drive the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, low bone mineral density (BMD) and OVF. Several genetic loci have been associated with a higher vertebral fracture risk, although at varying degrees of significance. The present challenge is clarifying whether these associations are specific to vertebral fractures or osteoporosis more generally. Furthermore, these factors could be exploited for diagnostic interpretation as biomarkers [including novel long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, micro (mi)RNAs and circular (circ)RNAs]. The extent of methylation of genes, alongside post-translational histone modifications, have shown to affect several interlinked pathways that converge on the regulation of bone deposition and resorption, partially through their influence on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Lastly, in addition to biomarkers, several exciting new imaging modalities could add to the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method used for BMD assessment. New technologies, and novel sequences within existing imaging modalities, may be able to quantify the quality of bone in addition to the BMD and bone structure; these are making progress through various stages of development from the pre-clinical sphere through to deployment in the clinical setting. In this mini review, we explore the literature to clarify the genetic and epigenetic factors associated with spinal fragility fractures and delineate the causal genes, pathways and interactions which could drive different risk profiles. We also outline the cutting-edge imaging modalities which could transform diagnostic protocols for OVF. AME Publishing Company 2023-10-08 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10644129/ /pubmed/37969626 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mini-Review Himič, Vratko Syrmos, Nikolaos Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I. Kato, So Fehlings, Michael G. Ganau, Mario The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title | The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title_full | The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title_fullStr | The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title_short | The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
title_sort | role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis |
topic | Mini-Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969626 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT himicvratko theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT syrmosnikolaos theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT ligarottigianfrancoki theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT katoso theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT fehlingsmichaelg theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT ganaumario theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT himicvratko roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT syrmosnikolaos roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT ligarottigianfrancoki roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT katoso roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT fehlingsmichaelg roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis AT ganaumario roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis |