Cargando…

The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Himič, Vratko, Syrmos, Nikolaos, Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I., Kato, So, Fehlings, Michael G., Ganau, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969626
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513
_version_ 1785147201153925120
author Himič, Vratko
Syrmos, Nikolaos
Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I.
Kato, So
Fehlings, Michael G.
Ganau, Mario
author_facet Himič, Vratko
Syrmos, Nikolaos
Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I.
Kato, So
Fehlings, Michael G.
Ganau, Mario
author_sort Himič, Vratko
collection PubMed
description Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognostication. OVF have been shown to be more prevalent in Caucasian patient cohorts in comparison to the Eastern Asian population. These population-based differences in risk for developing OVF suggest that there could be genetic and epigenetic factors that drive the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, low bone mineral density (BMD) and OVF. Several genetic loci have been associated with a higher vertebral fracture risk, although at varying degrees of significance. The present challenge is clarifying whether these associations are specific to vertebral fractures or osteoporosis more generally. Furthermore, these factors could be exploited for diagnostic interpretation as biomarkers [including novel long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, micro (mi)RNAs and circular (circ)RNAs]. The extent of methylation of genes, alongside post-translational histone modifications, have shown to affect several interlinked pathways that converge on the regulation of bone deposition and resorption, partially through their influence on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Lastly, in addition to biomarkers, several exciting new imaging modalities could add to the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method used for BMD assessment. New technologies, and novel sequences within existing imaging modalities, may be able to quantify the quality of bone in addition to the BMD and bone structure; these are making progress through various stages of development from the pre-clinical sphere through to deployment in the clinical setting. In this mini review, we explore the literature to clarify the genetic and epigenetic factors associated with spinal fragility fractures and delineate the causal genes, pathways and interactions which could drive different risk profiles. We also outline the cutting-edge imaging modalities which could transform diagnostic protocols for OVF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10644129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106441292023-11-15 The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis Himič, Vratko Syrmos, Nikolaos Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I. Kato, So Fehlings, Michael G. Ganau, Mario Quant Imaging Med Surg Mini-Review Osteoporosis predisposes patients to spinal fragility fractures. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and prognostication of these osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, the current imaging knowledge base for OVF is lacking sufficient standardisation to enable effective risk prognostication. OVF have been shown to be more prevalent in Caucasian patient cohorts in comparison to the Eastern Asian population. These population-based differences in risk for developing OVF suggest that there could be genetic and epigenetic factors that drive the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, low bone mineral density (BMD) and OVF. Several genetic loci have been associated with a higher vertebral fracture risk, although at varying degrees of significance. The present challenge is clarifying whether these associations are specific to vertebral fractures or osteoporosis more generally. Furthermore, these factors could be exploited for diagnostic interpretation as biomarkers [including novel long non-coding (lnc)RNAs, micro (mi)RNAs and circular (circ)RNAs]. The extent of methylation of genes, alongside post-translational histone modifications, have shown to affect several interlinked pathways that converge on the regulation of bone deposition and resorption, partially through their influence on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation. Lastly, in addition to biomarkers, several exciting new imaging modalities could add to the established dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) method used for BMD assessment. New technologies, and novel sequences within existing imaging modalities, may be able to quantify the quality of bone in addition to the BMD and bone structure; these are making progress through various stages of development from the pre-clinical sphere through to deployment in the clinical setting. In this mini review, we explore the literature to clarify the genetic and epigenetic factors associated with spinal fragility fractures and delineate the causal genes, pathways and interactions which could drive different risk profiles. We also outline the cutting-edge imaging modalities which could transform diagnostic protocols for OVF. AME Publishing Company 2023-10-08 2023-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10644129/ /pubmed/37969626 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513 Text en 2023 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mini-Review
Himič, Vratko
Syrmos, Nikolaos
Ligarotti, Gianfranco K. I.
Kato, So
Fehlings, Michael G.
Ganau, Mario
The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title_full The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title_fullStr The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title_full_unstemmed The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title_short The role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
title_sort role of genetic and epigenetic factors in determining the risk of spinal fragility fractures: new insights in the management of spinal osteoporosis
topic Mini-Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10644129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37969626
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-513
work_keys_str_mv AT himicvratko theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT syrmosnikolaos theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT ligarottigianfrancoki theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT katoso theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT fehlingsmichaelg theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT ganaumario theroleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT himicvratko roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT syrmosnikolaos roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT ligarottigianfrancoki roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT katoso roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT fehlingsmichaelg roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis
AT ganaumario roleofgeneticandepigeneticfactorsindeterminingtheriskofspinalfragilityfracturesnewinsightsinthemanagementofspinalosteoporosis